Neoconstitucionalismo
Neoconstitutionalism is referred to by some of its defenders as a new theoretical current of Law, which has come to change the General Theory of Law. Ronald Dworkin, Robert Alexy, Gustavo Zagrevelsky, Santiago Nino, among others, are considered the forerunners of this theoretical current, althoug...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8877795 |
| Source: | Revista Auctoritas Prudentium, ISSN 2305-9729, Nº. 28, 2023 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001589166
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Auctoritas Prudentium, ISSN 2305-9729, Nº. 28, 2023
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Derecho Natural
Derecho Positivo Constitución Constitucionalismo Neoconstitucionalismo Natural Law Positive Law Constitution Constitutionalism Neoconstitutionalism |
| spellingShingle |
Derecho Natural
Derecho Positivo Constitución Constitucionalismo Neoconstitucionalismo Natural Law Positive Law Constitution Constitutionalism Neoconstitutionalism Arroyave Reyes, Jorge Raúl Neoconstitucionalismo |
| description |
Neoconstitutionalism is referred to by some of its defenders as a new theoretical current
of Law, which has come to change the General Theory of Law. Ronald Dworkin, Robert
Alexy, Gustavo Zagrevelsky, Santiago Nino, among others, are considered the
forerunners of this theoretical current, although they personally do not refer to
neoconstitutionalism in any of their texts, but they are credited with being supporters of
this theory, due to the postulates they defend and what they understand by Law.
Each of them developed epistemological positions, generally oriented to the distinction
between rules and principles, their method of interpretation and application as part of the
law or the relationship between Law and morality.
In the philosophy of Law, there is and will be a struggle between iusnaturalism and
iuspositivism, who will defend the origin of law based on their own postulates. In this
intellectual work, it has been tried to place Neoconstitutionalism as a new current, but it is
nothing more than a disguise of natural law. On this account, some legal practitioners,
mainly in the constitutional courts, abusing interpretation and consideration in their
presentations have undermined what the Constitution says or does not say, under the
protective umbrella of the famous Neoconstitutionalism.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Arroyave Reyes, Jorge Raúl
|
| author_facet |
Arroyave Reyes, Jorge Raúl
|
| author_sort |
Arroyave Reyes, Jorge Raúl
|
| title |
Neoconstitucionalismo
|
| title_short |
Neoconstitucionalismo
|
| title_full |
Neoconstitucionalismo
|
| title_fullStr |
Neoconstitucionalismo
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Neoconstitucionalismo
|
| title_sort |
neoconstitucionalismo
|
| publishDate |
2023
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8877795
|
| _version_ |
1762118670018936832
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015891662023-04-01NeoconstitucionalismoArroyave Reyes, Jorge RaúlDerecho NaturalDerecho PositivoConstituciónConstitucionalismoNeoconstitucionalismoNatural LawPositive LawConstitutionConstitutionalismNeoconstitutionalismNeoconstitutionalism is referred to by some of its defenders as a new theoretical current of Law, which has come to change the General Theory of Law. Ronald Dworkin, Robert Alexy, Gustavo Zagrevelsky, Santiago Nino, among others, are considered the forerunners of this theoretical current, although they personally do not refer to neoconstitutionalism in any of their texts, but they are credited with being supporters of this theory, due to the postulates they defend and what they understand by Law. Each of them developed epistemological positions, generally oriented to the distinction between rules and principles, their method of interpretation and application as part of the law or the relationship between Law and morality. In the philosophy of Law, there is and will be a struggle between iusnaturalism and iuspositivism, who will defend the origin of law based on their own postulates. In this intellectual work, it has been tried to place Neoconstitutionalism as a new current, but it is nothing more than a disguise of natural law. On this account, some legal practitioners, mainly in the constitutional courts, abusing interpretation and consideration in their presentations have undermined what the Constitution says or does not say, under the protective umbrella of the famous Neoconstitutionalism.El Neoconstitucionalismo es referido por algunos de sus defensores como una nueva corriente teórica del Derecho, que ha venido a cambiar la propia Teoría General del Derecho. Le atribuyen a Ronald Dworkin, Robert Alexy, Gustavo Zagrevelsky, Santiago Nino, entre otros, ser los precursores de esta corriente teórica, aunque ellos en lo personal no hacen referencia en ninguno de sus textos al neoconstitucionalismo, pero se les carga de ser partidarios de esta por los postulados que defienden y lo que entienden por Derecho. Cada uno de ellos desarrollan posiciones epistemológicas, orientadas generalmente a la distinción entre reglas y principios, su método de interpretación y de aplicación como parte del derecho o bien la relación entre el derecho y la moral. En la filosofía del Derecho, existe y existirá una lucha entre iusnaturalistas e iuspositivistas, quienes defenderán el origen del derecho atendiendo a sus propios postulados. En esa labor intelectual, se ha pretendido situar al Neoconstitucionalismo como una corriente nueva, pero no es más que un disfraz del derecho natural. De esa cuenta algunos operadores jurídicos, principalmente en las cortes constitucionales, abusando de la interpretación y de la ponderación, en sus ponencias han desvirtuado el sentido del texto de la Constitución afirmando que ese texto dice, lo que en realidad no dice, pero ellos dicen que lo dice, todo bajo la sombrilla protectora del famoso Neoconstitucionalismo.2023text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8877795(Revista) ISSN 2305-9729Revista Auctoritas Prudentium, ISSN 2305-9729, Nº. 28, 2023spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|