Ex aequo et bono los arbitrajes de equidad: ¿el árbitro cuasi-legislador?
Guatemalan Arbitration Law contemplates two forms of arbitration in terms of its nature: arbitration of law and arbitration of equity. The main distinction between these being that in an equity arbitration, the arbitrators can decide in conscience or according to their best knowledge or belief. S...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8877794 |
| Source: | Revista Auctoritas Prudentium, ISSN 2305-9729, Nº. 28, 2023 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001589165
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Auctoritas Prudentium, ISSN 2305-9729, Nº. 28, 2023
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Arbitraje de equidad
amigable composición responsabilidad legal del árbitro Ley de Arbitraje de Guatemala justicia fuentes de derecho Equity Arbitration amicable composition equity arbitrator’s legal responsibility equidad Guatemalan Arbitration Law justice sources of law |
| spellingShingle |
Arbitraje de equidad
amigable composición responsabilidad legal del árbitro Ley de Arbitraje de Guatemala justicia fuentes de derecho Equity Arbitration amicable composition equity arbitrator’s legal responsibility equidad Guatemalan Arbitration Law justice sources of law Castellanos Howell, Alvaro Ex aequo et bono los arbitrajes de equidad: ¿el árbitro cuasi-legislador? |
| description |
Guatemalan Arbitration Law contemplates two forms of arbitration in terms of its nature:
arbitration of law and arbitration of equity. The main distinction between these being that
in an equity arbitration, the arbitrators can decide in conscience or according to their best
knowledge or belief. Said faculty, however, due to its permissive and broad regulation in
the Guatemalan legal system, can generate multiple interpretations. That is why this article explores the scope of the faculties granted to the arbitrators in an arbitration of
equity, seeking particularly to determine if the nature of the arbitration of equity allows
them to disregard the applicable legal norms to the case.
It is the objective of this article to demonstrate that the answer to the previous question is
negative. Being equity, a tool destined to temper the consequences of the application of
the law to the specific case, improving the law, but not replacing it. Therefore, the
arbitrators in an equity arbitration are bound to observe the provisions of applicable law,
in particular, the imperative or public policy rules, as well as the contractual provisions and
commercial uses, if any, having the dispositive power to use equity as a complementary
tool.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Castellanos Howell, Alvaro
|
| author_facet |
Castellanos Howell, Alvaro
|
| author_sort |
Castellanos Howell, Alvaro
|
| title |
Ex aequo et bono los arbitrajes de equidad: ¿el árbitro cuasi-legislador?
|
| title_short |
Ex aequo et bono los arbitrajes de equidad: ¿el árbitro cuasi-legislador?
|
| title_full |
Ex aequo et bono los arbitrajes de equidad: ¿el árbitro cuasi-legislador?
|
| title_fullStr |
Ex aequo et bono los arbitrajes de equidad: ¿el árbitro cuasi-legislador?
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Ex aequo et bono los arbitrajes de equidad: ¿el árbitro cuasi-legislador?
|
| title_sort |
ex aequo et bono los arbitrajes de equidad: ¿el árbitro cuasi-legislador?
|
| publishDate |
2023
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8877794
|
| _version_ |
1762118669812367360
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015891652023-04-01Ex aequo et bono los arbitrajes de equidad: ¿el árbitro cuasi-legislador?Castellanos Howell, AlvaroArbitraje de equidadamigable composiciónresponsabilidad legal del árbitroLey de Arbitraje de Guatemalajusticiafuentes de derechoEquity Arbitrationamicable compositionequityarbitrator’s legal responsibilityequidadGuatemalan Arbitration Lawjusticesources of lawGuatemalan Arbitration Law contemplates two forms of arbitration in terms of its nature: arbitration of law and arbitration of equity. The main distinction between these being that in an equity arbitration, the arbitrators can decide in conscience or according to their best knowledge or belief. Said faculty, however, due to its permissive and broad regulation in the Guatemalan legal system, can generate multiple interpretations. That is why this article explores the scope of the faculties granted to the arbitrators in an arbitration of equity, seeking particularly to determine if the nature of the arbitration of equity allows them to disregard the applicable legal norms to the case. It is the objective of this article to demonstrate that the answer to the previous question is negative. Being equity, a tool destined to temper the consequences of the application of the law to the specific case, improving the law, but not replacing it. Therefore, the arbitrators in an equity arbitration are bound to observe the provisions of applicable law, in particular, the imperative or public policy rules, as well as the contractual provisions and commercial uses, if any, having the dispositive power to use equity as a complementary tool.La ley de arbitraje de Guatemala contempla dos formas de arbitraje en cuanto a su naturaleza: arbitraje de derecho y arbitraje de equidad; siendo la distinción principal entre estos, el que en un arbitraje de equidad los árbitros pueden decidir, no solo con base en derecho, sino en conciencia o según su leal saber o entender. Dicha facultad, sin embargo, dada su regulación amplia y facultativa dentro del ordenamiento jurídico guatemalteco puede dar lugar a diversas interpretaciones. Es por ello que este artículo explora el alcance de las facultades de los árbitros en un arbitraje de equidad, buscando particularmente determinar si la naturaleza del arbitraje de equidad les permite desatender la normativa vigente y aplicable al caso concreto. Es el objetivo de este artículo el demostrar que la respuesta a la previa interrogante es negativa. Siendo la equidad una herramienta destinada a atemperar las consecuencias de la aplicación del derecho al caso concreto, mejorándolo, pero no sustituyéndolo. Como consecuencia, los árbitros en un arbitraje de equidad están obligados a observar las disposiciones de derecho aplicables, ante todo las normas con contenido imperativo, así como las disposiciones contractuales y usos mercantiles relevantes, en su caso, teniendo la facultad dispositiva de utilizar la equidad como herramienta complementaria.2023text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8877794(Revista) ISSN 2305-9729Revista Auctoritas Prudentium, ISSN 2305-9729, Nº. 28, 2023spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|