The missing linke? Restraint and realignment in the German left, 2005-‍2017

This article serves two purposes: Firstly, it aims to introduce the reader to the rich and diverse party environment of the German radical left party “Die Linke”. Secondly, this paper is going to argue that the party’s apparent lack of “office-seeking” at the national level is directly relat to the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roder, Knut
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6260962
Source:Revista española de ciencia política, ISSN 1575-6548, Nº 45, 2017, pags. 43-65
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001583368
record_format
dialnet
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Revista española de ciencia política, ISSN 1575-6548, Nº 45, 2017, pags. 43-65
language
English
topic
cohesion
cooperation
crisis
Alemania
izquierda
Die Linke
consecución de cargos
política partidista
radicalismo
spellingShingle
cohesion
cooperation
crisis
Alemania
izquierda
Die Linke
consecución de cargos
política partidista
radicalismo
Roder, Knut
The missing linke? Restraint and realignment in the German left, 2005-‍2017
description
This article serves two purposes: Firstly, it aims to introduce the reader to the rich and diverse party environment of the German radical left party “Die Linke”. Secondly, this paper is going to argue that the party’s apparent lack of “office-seeking” at the national level is directly relat to the requirements of its immense diversity. The issue addressed focuses on one of the aspects of the failure of cooperation between the three parties on Germany’s centre-left at the national level, and argues that besides the hesitancy of the SPD and Greens to embrace such an under-taking, Die Linke has not been ready to push for a left of centre cooperation either, due to an existential need of self-preservation and internal cohesion. This paper is based on an analysis of Die Linke’s policy debates on the issue of the economic and euro-zone crises as an example to document the large number of competing and politically diverse factions within the party that must find common policy ground and be accommodated when reaching party-wide pol-icy positions. While this tension can be overcome by agreeing on low common denominators to voice concerns and reject government policies in an opposition role, the role as a potential junior partner in a wider “centre-left” party coalition would require far more advanced agree-ments on wide-ranging policy compromises with the SPD and Greens; and this would be highly divisive and threaten Die Linke’s inner-party cohesion. In response, Die Linke has continued to avoid committing to a strategy that would clearly advocate the formation of a national level “left-of-centre” party coalition to challenge the country’s centre-right government.
format
Article
author
Roder, Knut
author_facet
Roder, Knut
author_sort
Roder, Knut
title
The missing linke? Restraint and realignment in the German left, 2005-‍2017
title_short
The missing linke? Restraint and realignment in the German left, 2005-‍2017
title_full
The missing linke? Restraint and realignment in the German left, 2005-‍2017
title_fullStr
The missing linke? Restraint and realignment in the German left, 2005-‍2017
title_full_unstemmed
The missing linke? Restraint and realignment in the German left, 2005-‍2017
title_sort
missing linke? restraint and realignment in the german left, 2005-‍2017
publishDate
2017
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6260962
_version_
1759948170195894272
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015833682023-03-08The missing linke? Restraint and realignment in the German left, 2005-‍2017Roder, KnutcohesioncooperationcrisisAlemaniaizquierdaDie Linkeconsecución de cargospolítica partidistaradicalismoThis article serves two purposes: Firstly, it aims to introduce the reader to the rich and diverse party environment of the German radical left party “Die Linke”. Secondly, this paper is going to argue that the party’s apparent lack of “office-seeking” at the national level is directly relat to the requirements of its immense diversity. The issue addressed focuses on one of the aspects of the failure of cooperation between the three parties on Germany’s centre-left at the national level, and argues that besides the hesitancy of the SPD and Greens to embrace such an under-taking, Die Linke has not been ready to push for a left of centre cooperation either, due to an existential need of self-preservation and internal cohesion. This paper is based on an analysis of Die Linke’s policy debates on the issue of the economic and euro-zone crises as an example to document the large number of competing and politically diverse factions within the party that must find common policy ground and be accommodated when reaching party-wide pol-icy positions. While this tension can be overcome by agreeing on low common denominators to voice concerns and reject government policies in an opposition role, the role as a potential junior partner in a wider “centre-left” party coalition would require far more advanced agree-ments on wide-ranging policy compromises with the SPD and Greens; and this would be highly divisive and threaten Die Linke’s inner-party cohesion. In response, Die Linke has continued to avoid committing to a strategy that would clearly advocate the formation of a national level “left-of-centre” party coalition to challenge the country’s centre-right government.Este artículo tiene dos objetivos: en primer lugar, pretende introducir al lector en el rico y diverso ambiente del partido de la izquierda radical alemán Die Linke. En segundo lugar, este artículo argumentará que la aparente falta de orientación del partido a la “búsqueda de cargos públicos” a nivel nacional está directamente relacionada con los requisitos de su inmensa diversidad. El tema abordado se centra en uno de los aspectos del fracaso en la cooperación entre los tres partidos de centro-izquierda en Alemania a nivel nacional, y argumenta , además de la indecisión del SPD y de los Verdes para abrazar tal proyecto, Die Linke tampoco ha estado preparado para presionar en busca de una cooperación de izquierda, debido a una necesidad existencial de autopreservación y cohesión interna. Este artículo se basa en el análisis de los debates políticos de Die Linke sobre el tema de la crisis económica y de la eurozona como un ejemplo para documentar el gran número de facciones en competición y políticamente diversas dentro del partido, que tienen que encontrar una base política común y ser acomodadas cuando el partido adopta posiciones políticas. Aunque esta tensión puede superarse cuando se alcancen acuerdos para expresar inquietudes y rechazar las políticas gubernamentales en un papel de oposición, el papel de un posible socio menor en una coalición de partidos de centroizquierda más amplia requeriría acuerdos mucho más avanzados en compromisos sobre políticas de amplio alcance con el SPD y los Verdes, que serían altamente divisivos y amenazarían la cohesión interna de Die Linke. Como respuesta, Die Linke ha evitado comprometerse con una estrategia que claramente abogaría por la formación de una coalición de centro-izquierda a nivel nacional para desafiar al Gobierno de centroderecha estatal.2017text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6260962(Revista) ISSN 1575-6548Revista española de ciencia política, ISSN 1575-6548, Nº 45, 2017, pags. 43-65engLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI