Ciudadanía, integración y universalismo: análisis y evaluación normativa de los programas de integración cívica en Alemania y Francia desde una perspectiva liberal
This paper analyzes the citizenship courses and exams recently introduced in Europe. Does the manner in which each country understands nationhood and citizenship determine the content of these programmes or are there similarities, regardless of the country’s conception of nationhood? How can we expl...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5608070 |
| Source: | Revista española de ciencia política, ISSN 1575-6548, Nº 41, 2016, pags. 39-66 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
This paper analyzes the citizenship courses and exams recently introduced in Europe. Does the
manner in which each country understands nationhood and citizenship determine the content
of these programmes or are there similarities, regardless of the country’s conception of nationhood?
How can we explain these similarities and differences? Do these programmes reflect an
idea of belonging based on a commitment to civic values that are inclusionary and universalist
rather than on shared cultural traditions that are exclusionary and particularist? Or are there
tensions between the normative proposal of liberal universalism and its realization in certain
policies of integration?
To answer these questions, I propose an analytical framework that enables a normative evaluation
of civic integration programmes in France and Germany. I, thus, carry out an in-depth
analysis of the programmes, in order to explain their similarities and differences, both from a
theoretical perspective and in relation to the political life in each country. Although these
countries represent divergent conceptions of nationhood and citizenship, the analysis of their
respective programmes reveals many similarities. However, in spite of what one might expect,
both bring to light certain paradoxes regarding the liberal and universalist ideal that inspires
them, which expose the possible exclusionary consequences of this type of measure, which are
hard to reconcile with the liberal democratic values they are trying to protect. |
|---|