El delito de administración desleal en Colombia desde una perspectiva societaria

The offence of disloyal administration, established by Article 250B of the Colombian Penal Code, was created as an instrument to combat corruption in the private sector. The Colombian legislator was inspired by the Spanish legal system to criminalize the act of the administrator who, abusing his or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pantoja Ruíz, Juan Pablo
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8761491
Source:Nuevo Foro Penal, ISSN 0120-8179, null 17, Nº. 97, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Nuevo Foro Penal), pags. 99-139
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001572417
record_format
dialnet
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Nuevo Foro Penal, ISSN 0120-8179, null 17, Nº. 97, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Nuevo Foro Penal), pags. 99-139
language
Spanish
topic
Derecho penal
derecho societario
administración desleal
acción social de responsabilidad
conflicto de interés
derecho penal económico
deberes fiduciarios
lealtad
abuso de sus funciones
administrador
Judgment Rule
criminal law
corporate law
disloyal administration
social action of liability
conflicts of interest
economic criminal law
fiduciary duties
loyalty
abuse of office
Business Judgment Rule
spellingShingle
Derecho penal
derecho societario
administración desleal
acción social de responsabilidad
conflicto de interés
derecho penal económico
deberes fiduciarios
lealtad
abuso de sus funciones
administrador
Judgment Rule
criminal law
corporate law
disloyal administration
social action of liability
conflicts of interest
economic criminal law
fiduciary duties
loyalty
abuse of office
Business Judgment Rule
Pantoja Ruíz, Juan Pablo
El delito de administración desleal en Colombia desde una perspectiva societaria
description
The offence of disloyal administration, established by Article 250B of the Colombian Penal Code, was created as an instrument to combat corruption in the private sector. The Colombian legislator was inspired by the Spanish legal system to criminalize the act of the administrator who, abusing his or her functions, disposes of company assets or incurs contractual commitments at the company's expense, causing an economically assessable damage. However, to understand when the administrator acts outside his functions and abuses them requires a closer look at company law, which originally regulates the duties of administrators. This paper studies this relationship between criminal law and corporate law to seek to give content to the crime of unfair administration under the theory of the fiduciary duties of the administrator in Colombia. After this, he studies the particularities of the type of unfair administration, pointing out that its wording could be improved, since the promoters of companies in formation were not included, the damage should be predicated on the company and not on its partners, and any administrator who acts for a benefit other than that of the company also abuses the functions of his or her position. Finally, some general conclusions are presented. 
format
Article
author
Pantoja Ruíz, Juan Pablo
author_facet
Pantoja Ruíz, Juan Pablo
author_sort
Pantoja Ruíz, Juan Pablo
title
El delito de administración desleal en Colombia desde una perspectiva societaria
title_short
El delito de administración desleal en Colombia desde una perspectiva societaria
title_full
El delito de administración desleal en Colombia desde una perspectiva societaria
title_fullStr
El delito de administración desleal en Colombia desde una perspectiva societaria
title_full_unstemmed
El delito de administración desleal en Colombia desde una perspectiva societaria
title_sort
el delito de administración desleal en colombia desde una perspectiva societaria
publishDate
2021
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8761491
_version_
1756226001754390528
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015724172023-01-26El delito de administración desleal en Colombia desde una perspectiva societariaPantoja Ruíz, Juan PabloDerecho penalderecho societarioadministración deslealacción social de responsabilidadconflicto de interésderecho penal económicodeberes fiduciarioslealtadabuso de sus funcionesadministradorJudgment Rulecriminal lawcorporate lawdisloyal administrationsocial action of liabilityconflicts of interesteconomic criminal lawfiduciary dutiesloyaltyabuse of officeBusiness Judgment RuleThe offence of disloyal administration, established by Article 250B of the Colombian Penal Code, was created as an instrument to combat corruption in the private sector. The Colombian legislator was inspired by the Spanish legal system to criminalize the act of the administrator who, abusing his or her functions, disposes of company assets or incurs contractual commitments at the company's expense, causing an economically assessable damage. However, to understand when the administrator acts outside his functions and abuses them requires a closer look at company law, which originally regulates the duties of administrators. This paper studies this relationship between criminal law and corporate law to seek to give content to the crime of unfair administration under the theory of the fiduciary duties of the administrator in Colombia. After this, he studies the particularities of the type of unfair administration, pointing out that its wording could be improved, since the promoters of companies in formation were not included, the damage should be predicated on the company and not on its partners, and any administrator who acts for a benefit other than that of the company also abuses the functions of his or her position. Finally, some general conclusions are presented. El delito de administración desleal, tipificado por el artículo 250B del Código Penal colombiano, nace como un instrumento para combatir la corrupción en el sector privado. El legislador colombiano se inspiró en el ordenamiento jurídico español para tipificar como delito el acto del administrador que, abusando de sus funciones, dispone de bienes de la sociedad o contrae obligaciones a cargo de está causando un perjuicio económicamente evaluable. Sin embargo, entender cuándo el administrador actúa por fuera de sus funciones y en abuso de estas requiere aproximarse a la legislación societaria, ordenamiento que regula originalmente los deberes de los administradores. Este artículo estudia esta relación entre el derecho penal y el derecho societario de cara a buscar dotar de contenido el delito de administración desleal bajo la teoría de los deberes fiduciarios del administrador en Colombia. Luego de ello estudia las particularidades del tipo de administración desleal, señalando que su redacción es susceptible de mejoría, puesto que faltó incluir a los promotores de las sociedades en formación, el perjuicio se debería predicar de la sociedad y no de sus socios y todo el administrador que actúa en un beneficio distinto al de la compañía también abusa de las funciones propias de su cargo. Por último, se presentan algunas conclusiones generales.2021text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8761491(Revista) ISSN 0120-8179Nuevo Foro Penal, ISSN 0120-8179, null 17, Nº. 97, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Nuevo Foro Penal), pags. 99-139spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI