A Comparative Analysis of the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights on the Right against Self-Incrimination

dialnet-ar-18-ART0001568563

dialnet

dialnet-ar-18-ART00015685632023-01-17A Comparative Analysis of the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights on the Right against Self-IncriminationEscobar Veas, JavierKEYWORDS: Right against self-incriminationright to remain silentincriminatory evidenceThe right against self-incrimination can be understood as the right of all persons to remain silent and not to be forced to collaborate with an investigation against them. Despite of its fundamental importance, the right against self-incrimination raises several theoretical and practical discussions. Can defendants refuse to produce documentary evidence? Does this right apply to administrative and civil proceedings? What degree of coercion is necessary to trigger the application of this right? This article aims to analyse the evolution and current state of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in order to elucidate how the European court has resolved the questions posed above.El derecho a no autoincriminarse puede ser entendido como el derecho de todas las personas a permanecer en silencio y a no ser forzadas a colaborar con una investigación dirigida en su contra. A pesar de su fundamental importancia, el derecho a no autoincriminarse continúa planteando diversas discusiones, tanto a nivel teórico como práctico. ¿Pueden las personas imputadas rehusarse a entregar evidencia documental? ¿Puede este derecho aplicarse en procedimientos administrativos y civiles? ¿Cuál es el grado exigido de coacción para entender que este derecho ha sido infringido? Este artículo tiene por objeto analizar la evolución y el estado actual de la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos, a fin de dilucidar cómo este tribunal ha resuelto las interrogantes planteadas anteriormente.2022text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8739201(Revista) ISSN 2525-510XRevista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, Vol. 8, Nº. 2, 2022engLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI

Dialnet

Dialnet AR

Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, Vol. 8, Nº. 2, 2022

English

KEYWORDS: Right against self-incrimination
right to remain silent
incriminatory evidence

KEYWORDS: Right against self-incrimination
right to remain silent
incriminatory evidence
Escobar Veas, Javier
A Comparative Analysis of the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights on the Right against Self-Incrimination

The right against self-incrimination can be understood as the right of all persons to remain silent and not to be forced to collaborate with an investigation against them. Despite of its fundamental importance, the right against self-incrimination raises several theoretical and practical discussions. Can defendants refuse to produce documentary evidence? Does this right apply to administrative and civil proceedings? What degree of coercion is necessary to trigger the application of this right? This article aims to analyse the evolution and current state of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in order to elucidate how the European court has resolved the questions posed above.

Article

Escobar Veas, Javier

Escobar Veas, Javier

Escobar Veas, Javier

A Comparative Analysis of the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights on the Right against Self-Incrimination

A Comparative Analysis of the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights on the Right against Self-Incrimination

A Comparative Analysis of the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights on the Right against Self-Incrimination

A Comparative Analysis of the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights on the Right against Self-Incrimination

A Comparative Analysis of the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights on the Right against Self-Incrimination

comparative analysis of the case law of the european court of human rights on the right against self-incrimination

2022

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8739201

1755410669392363520