A constitued constituent process? Chile’s failed attempt to replace Pinochet’s constitution (2013-2019)

Chile’s 1980 constitution was forcibly imposed by a bloody dictatorship. Its original sin, however, was not the only democratic fault. The rules or constitutional locks were designed to have a protected democracy that limited the exercise of popular sovereignty. Until today, Chile is the only Latin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Contreras Vásquez, Pablo, Lovera Parmo, Domingo A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8635840
Source:Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito (RECHTD), ISSN 2175-2168, Vol. 13, Nº. 3, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Setembro/Dezembro), pags. 297-314
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Summary: Chile’s 1980 constitution was forcibly imposed by a bloody dictatorship. Its original sin, however, was not the only democratic fault. The rules or constitutional locks were designed to have a protected democracy that limited the exercise of popular sovereignty. Until today, Chile is the only Latin American democracy that has not yet replaced the substantive normative grounds upon which the dictatorship cemented its power. The paper examines how the theory of constituted constituent power may have ambivalent results, by taking Chile’s case study. In particular, it assess the attempt of former President Bachelet to replace the Constitution under the current rules. Although such project initially had the potential to truly transform Chile’s constitutio