Daños punitivos, especialmente para proteger el interés colectivo o difuso de los consumidores
This paper studies critically the punitive damages regulated by law n.° 19496, with the objective of detect and evaluate the positive and questionable aspects of its regulation in the framework of consumer protection, through a dogmatic methodology based on regulations, bibliography and national...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8572025 |
| Source: | Revista chilena de derecho privado, ISSN 0718-0233, Nº. 38 (julio), 2022, pags. 63-107 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001545741
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista chilena de derecho privado, ISSN 0718-0233, Nº. 38 (julio), 2022, pags. 63-107
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
daños punitivos
interés colectivo o difuso consumidores punitive damages collective or diffuse interest consumers |
| spellingShingle |
daños punitivos
interés colectivo o difuso consumidores punitive damages collective or diffuse interest consumers Hernández Paulsen, Gabriel Ponce Márquez, Matías Daños punitivos, especialmente para proteger el interés colectivo o difuso de los consumidores |
| description |
This paper studies critically the punitive damages regulated by law n.° 19496,
with the objective of detect and evaluate the positive and questionable
aspects of its regulation in the framework of consumer protection, through
a dogmatic methodology based on regulations, bibliography and national
and foreign jurisprudence, which allows a qualitative analysis of such
sources in order to present and elaborate the hypothesis, theoretical framework, reflections and conclusions. In sections i and ii, a theoretical framework is formulated, represented by an approach to punitive damages
on the basis of national and comparative backgraunds, through the specific study of their nature and function, and it application in Chile by
reviewing the discussions that have taken place in this regard, particularly
regarding the alleged problems of constitutionality and the reparatory
nature of civil liability. The hypothesis is that the regulation of punitive
damages in the aforementioned law is positive because it contributes to
sanctioning, deterring and preventing serious supplier misconduct, but
questionable with respect to the regulation of its quantification; aspects
that are developed in section iii.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Hernández Paulsen, Gabriel
Ponce Márquez, Matías |
| author_facet |
Hernández Paulsen, Gabriel
Ponce Márquez, Matías |
| author_sort |
Hernández Paulsen, Gabriel
|
| title |
Daños punitivos, especialmente para proteger el interés colectivo o difuso de los consumidores
|
| title_short |
Daños punitivos, especialmente para proteger el interés colectivo o difuso de los consumidores
|
| title_full |
Daños punitivos, especialmente para proteger el interés colectivo o difuso de los consumidores
|
| title_fullStr |
Daños punitivos, especialmente para proteger el interés colectivo o difuso de los consumidores
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Daños punitivos, especialmente para proteger el interés colectivo o difuso de los consumidores
|
| title_sort |
daños punitivos, especialmente para proteger el interés colectivo o difuso de los consumidores
|
| publishDate |
2022
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8572025
|
| _version_ |
1745245034133848064
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015457412022-09-27Daños punitivos, especialmente para proteger el interés colectivo o difuso de los consumidoresHernández Paulsen, GabrielPonce Márquez, Matíasdaños punitivosinterés colectivo o difusoconsumidorespunitive damagescollective or diffuse interestconsumersThis paper studies critically the punitive damages regulated by law n.° 19496, with the objective of detect and evaluate the positive and questionable aspects of its regulation in the framework of consumer protection, through a dogmatic methodology based on regulations, bibliography and national and foreign jurisprudence, which allows a qualitative analysis of such sources in order to present and elaborate the hypothesis, theoretical framework, reflections and conclusions. In sections i and ii, a theoretical framework is formulated, represented by an approach to punitive damages on the basis of national and comparative backgraunds, through the specific study of their nature and function, and it application in Chile by reviewing the discussions that have taken place in this regard, particularly regarding the alleged problems of constitutionality and the reparatory nature of civil liability. The hypothesis is that the regulation of punitive damages in the aforementioned law is positive because it contributes to sanctioning, deterring and preventing serious supplier misconduct, but questionable with respect to the regulation of its quantification; aspects that are developed in section iii.En este trabajo se estudian de manera crítica los daños punitivos regulados por la ley n.º 19496, con el objetivo de detectar y evaluar tanto los aspectos positivos como los cuestionables de su reglamentación en el marco de la protección de los consumidores. Ello, empleando una metodología dogmática fundada en la normativa, bibliografía y jurisprudencia nacional y extranjera, que permite analizar de modo cualitativo tales fuentes en orden a presentar y elaborar la hipótesis, las reflexiones y las conclusiones. En los apartados i y ii se formula un marco teórico representado por una aproximación a los daños punitivos sobre la base de antecedentes nacionales y foráneos, a través del estudio específico de su naturaleza y función, y de su procedencia en Chile, en virtud de la revisión de las discusiones al respecto, en particular, en cuanto a los supuestos problemas de constitucionalidad a que darían lugar y el carácter reparatorio de la responsabilidad civil. La hipótesis central es que la regulación de los daños punitivos en la indicada ley es positiva al contribuir a sancionar, disuadir y prevenir conductas graves de los proveedores, pero cuestionable respecto de la reglamentación de su cuantificación; aspectos que se desarrollan en el acápite iii.2022text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8572025(Revista) ISSN 0718-0233Revista chilena de derecho privado, ISSN 0718-0233, Nº. 38 (julio), 2022, pags. 63-107spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|