L’istituzione tra decisione e oggettivismo giuridico: Schmitt lettore di Hauriou
The subject of this study investigates the relationship between “decision-thinking” and “Konkretes-Ordnungsdenken” in Carl Schmitt. Does the thinking of the institution really overflow with the “decision-making” approach? Really, the thought of the institution, insofar as it is internal to the logic...
Gorde:
Egile nagusia: | |
---|---|
Formatua: | Artikulua |
Hizkuntza: | Italiera |
Argitaratua: |
2022
|
Gaiak: | |
Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8560595 |
Baliabidea: | Jura Gentium: Rivista di filosofia del diritto internazionale e della politica globale, ISSN 1826-8269, Vol. 19, Nº. 1, 2022 (Ejemplar dedicado a: La concretezza dell'ordine. La svolta istituzionalista di Carl Schmitt), pags. 25-52 |
Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
Laburpena: |
The subject of this study investigates the relationship between “decision-thinking” and “Konkretes-Ordnungsdenken” in Carl Schmitt. Does the thinking of the institution really overflow with the “decision-making” approach? Really, the thought of the institution, insofar as it is internal to the logic by ideal-type, is internal to the decision-making paradigm. There are a lot of differences between the thinking of the 1930s and the previous reflection, but not such as to suggest a total change of epistemological paradigm by Carl Schmitt. In addition, institution and legal order (Santi Romano e Maurice Hauriou) are studied, outside ‘ideal-typical’ perspective. |
---|