Error judicial y prisión preventiva. Inercias transpersonalistas que erradicar
This article examines the legal regime, the jurisprudence evolution and the troubles of the state liability provided by Article 121 of the Spanish Constitution, focusing the analysis on wrongful remand as a specific judicial error. We aim to set up the terms of the debate after the changes introduce...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Idioma: | Castellano |
| Publicado: |
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8557449 |
| Fuente: | Revista española de derecho constitucional, ISSN 0211-5743, Año nº 42, Nº 125, 2022, pags. 45-76 |
| Etiquetas: |
Añadir etiqueta
Sin etiquetas: Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro
|
| Sumario: |
This article examines the legal regime, the jurisprudence evolution and the troubles of the state liability provided by Article 121 of the Spanish Constitution, focusing the analysis on wrongful remand as a specific judicial error. We aim to set up the terms of the debate after the changes introduced by Spain’s own Constitutional Court declaration of the unconstitutionality of a number of provisions of Article 294 of the country’s Organic Law on Judicial Powers (STC 85/2019), that solved partially some troubles, and at a good moment when a new project of reform of the Spain’s own criminal procedural law is at stake. The work includes a comparative analysis of these elements with other European countries and points out specific interpretative and lege ferenda proposals. |
|---|