Control de constitucionalidad en Ecuador: muchas alforjas para tan corto viaje
The control of constitutionality is one of the issues that have generated the greatest debates in the Ecuadorian legal sphere, among other factors, this due to the possible normative conflicts that arise in the Constitution —CRE— itself when determining the coexistence of two systems, the mixed and...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8547920 |
| Source: | FORO: Revista de Derecho, ISSN 2631-2484, Nº. 38, 2022 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Constitutional and Conventional Control in the Global Context), pags. 7-27 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001543262
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
FORO: Revista de Derecho, ISSN 2631-2484, Nº. 38, 2022 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Constitutional and Conventional Control in the Global Context), pags. 7-27
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
constitutionality control
diffuse control concentrated control direct application judicial review non-application rule consultation constitutional jurisprudence control de constitucionalidad control difuso control concentrado aplicación directa inaplicación consulta de norma jurisprudencia constitucional |
| spellingShingle |
constitutionality control
diffuse control concentrated control direct application judicial review non-application rule consultation constitutional jurisprudence control de constitucionalidad control difuso control concentrado aplicación directa inaplicación consulta de norma jurisprudencia constitucional Storini, Claudia Masapanta, Christian Guerra Coronel, Marcelo Alejandro Control de constitucionalidad en Ecuador: muchas alforjas para tan corto viaje |
| description |
The control of constitutionality is one of the issues that have generated the greatest debates in the Ecuadorian legal sphere, among other factors, this due to the possible normative conflicts that arise in the Constitution —CRE— itself when determining the coexistence of two systems, the mixed and the concentrated by the secondary regulation Organic Law of Jurisdictional Guarantees and Constitutional Control —LOGJCC—, and the contradictory jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador —CCE—. The main objectives of this paper are to analyse from a critical perspective the evolution of the Ecuadorian constitutional control since the approval of the 2008 Constitution, to determine the existing problems in relation to the mixed control of constitutionality and to reflect the existing chaotic jursprudence. For this purpose, a deductive analytical method has been employed, which begins with the study of the theory of constitutional control, followed by the analysis of the normative discipline, and a static analysis of the jurisprudence issued by the CCE in relation to constitutional control. This analysis concludes by representing the reasons in defense of the implementation of a mixed control of constitutionality and, therefore, of a new regulation more attentive to the guaranteeingsystem promoted by the Constitution of Montecristi.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Storini, Claudia
Masapanta, Christian Guerra Coronel, Marcelo Alejandro |
| author_facet |
Storini, Claudia
Masapanta, Christian Guerra Coronel, Marcelo Alejandro |
| author_sort |
Storini, Claudia
|
| title |
Control de constitucionalidad en Ecuador: muchas alforjas para tan corto viaje
|
| title_short |
Control de constitucionalidad en Ecuador: muchas alforjas para tan corto viaje
|
| title_full |
Control de constitucionalidad en Ecuador: muchas alforjas para tan corto viaje
|
| title_fullStr |
Control de constitucionalidad en Ecuador: muchas alforjas para tan corto viaje
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Control de constitucionalidad en Ecuador: muchas alforjas para tan corto viaje
|
| title_sort |
control de constitucionalidad en ecuador: muchas alforjas para tan corto viaje
|
| publishDate |
2022
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8547920
|
| _version_ |
1743342479352004608
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015432622022-09-06Control de constitucionalidad en Ecuador: muchas alforjas para tan corto viajeStorini, ClaudiaMasapanta, ChristianGuerra Coronel, Marcelo Alejandroconstitutionality controldiffuse controlconcentrated controldirect applicationjudicial reviewnon-applicationrule consultationconstitutional jurisprudencecontrol de constitucionalidadcontrol difusocontrol concentradoaplicación directainaplicaciónconsulta de normajurisprudencia constitucionalThe control of constitutionality is one of the issues that have generated the greatest debates in the Ecuadorian legal sphere, among other factors, this due to the possible normative conflicts that arise in the Constitution —CRE— itself when determining the coexistence of two systems, the mixed and the concentrated by the secondary regulation Organic Law of Jurisdictional Guarantees and Constitutional Control —LOGJCC—, and the contradictory jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador —CCE—. The main objectives of this paper are to analyse from a critical perspective the evolution of the Ecuadorian constitutional control since the approval of the 2008 Constitution, to determine the existing problems in relation to the mixed control of constitutionality and to reflect the existing chaotic jursprudence. For this purpose, a deductive analytical method has been employed, which begins with the study of the theory of constitutional control, followed by the analysis of the normative discipline, and a static analysis of the jurisprudence issued by the CCE in relation to constitutional control. This analysis concludes by representing the reasons in defense of the implementation of a mixed control of constitutionality and, therefore, of a new regulation more attentive to the guaranteeingsystem promoted by the Constitution of Montecristi.El control de constitucionalidad es uno de los temas que han generado mayores debates en el ámbito jurídico ecuatoriano, entre otros factores, aquello se debe a los posibles conflictos normativos que se presentan en la propia Constitución —CRE— al determinarse la coexistencia de dos sistemas: el mixto y el concentrado; esto se ha visto complementado con las indeterminaciones generadas por la normativa secundaria Ley Orgánica de Garantías Jurisdiccionales y Control Constitucional —LOGJCC—, y la contradictoria jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional de Ecuador —CCE—. Este trabajo tiene como principales objetivos analizar desde una perspectiva crítica la evolución del control constitucional ecuatoriano desde la aprobación de la Constitución de 2008, determinar los problemas existentes en relación con el control mixto de constitucionalidad; y reflejar la caótica jurisprudencia existente. Para ello se ha empleado un método analítico deductivo, que empieza con el estudio de la teoría del control constitucional, seguido por el análisis de la disciplina normativa, y un análisis estático de la jurisprudencia emitida por la CCE en relación con el control constitucional. Este análisis concluye planteando las razones en defensa de la implementación de un control mixto de constitucionalidad y, por tanto, de una nueva regulación más atenta al sistema garantista propulsado por la Constitución de Montecristi.2022text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8547920(Revista) ISSN 1390-2466(Revista) ISSN 2631-2484FORO: Revista de Derecho, ISSN 2631-2484, Nº. 38, 2022 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Constitutional and Conventional Control in the Global Context), pags. 7-27spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|