¿Qué es el activismo judicial? Parte I. Desiderata para una definición de activismo judicial
This writing is divided into two parts and, in a few words, is a work on the concept of judicial activism. Specifically, it defines judicial activism from a particular norms of competence theory formulated by Eugenio Bulygin, who explains norms of competence from the constituent rules. So, we propos...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8533142 |
| Source: | Díkaion: revista de actualidad jurídica, ISSN 0120-8942, Vol. 31, Nº. 1, 2022, pags. 70-92 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001541661
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Díkaion: revista de actualidad jurídica, ISSN 0120-8942, Vol. 31, Nº. 1, 2022, pags. 70-92
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Parroquialismo
moralidad en el derecho common law modificación de competencias Parochialism morality in law common law modification of competence Parroquialismo moralidade no direito common law modificação de competências |
| spellingShingle |
Parroquialismo
moralidad en el derecho common law modificación de competencias Parochialism morality in law common law modification of competence Parroquialismo moralidade no direito common law modificação de competências Rivas Robledo, Pablo ¿Qué es el activismo judicial? Parte I. Desiderata para una definición de activismo judicial |
| description |
This writing is divided into two parts and, in a few words, is a work on the concept of judicial activism. Specifically, it defines judicial activism from a particular norms of competence theory formulated by Eugenio Bulygin, who explains norms of competence from the constituent rules. So, we propose that judicial activism is the intentional modification of competence by the judge through his decisions. It was necessary to divide the writing into two parts to reach this result. This article presents the first part, which summarizes the main theories on judicial activism and then assesses the theories on judicial activism from individual and general criticisms. Consequently, we propose the desiderata that a definition of judicial activism must meet.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Rivas Robledo, Pablo
|
| author_facet |
Rivas Robledo, Pablo
|
| author_sort |
Rivas Robledo, Pablo
|
| title |
¿Qué es el activismo judicial? Parte I. Desiderata para una definición de activismo judicial
|
| title_short |
¿Qué es el activismo judicial? Parte I. Desiderata para una definición de activismo judicial
|
| title_full |
¿Qué es el activismo judicial? Parte I. Desiderata para una definición de activismo judicial
|
| title_fullStr |
¿Qué es el activismo judicial? Parte I. Desiderata para una definición de activismo judicial
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
¿Qué es el activismo judicial? Parte I. Desiderata para una definición de activismo judicial
|
| title_sort |
¿qué es el activismo judicial? parte i. desiderata para una definición de activismo judicial
|
| publishDate |
2022
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8533142
|
| _version_ |
1741439944063188992
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015416612022-08-12¿Qué es el activismo judicial? Parte I. Desiderata para una definición de activismo judicialRivas Robledo, PabloParroquialismomoralidad en el derechocommon lawmodificación de competenciasParochialismmorality in lawcommon lawmodification of competenceParroquialismomoralidade no direitocommon lawmodificação de competênciasThis writing is divided into two parts and, in a few words, is a work on the concept of judicial activism. Specifically, it defines judicial activism from a particular norms of competence theory formulated by Eugenio Bulygin, who explains norms of competence from the constituent rules. So, we propose that judicial activism is the intentional modification of competence by the judge through his decisions. It was necessary to divide the writing into two parts to reach this result. This article presents the first part, which summarizes the main theories on judicial activism and then assesses the theories on judicial activism from individual and general criticisms. Consequently, we propose the desiderata that a definition of judicial activism must meet.Este texto está dividido em duas partes e, em poucas palavras, trata-se de um trabalho sobre o conceito de “ativismo judicial”. Em concreto, nele, é oferecida uma definição de ativismo judicial sob uma teoria particular das normas de competência. A teoria em questão é de Eugenio Bulygin, o qual explica as normas de concorrência a partir das regras constitucionais. Dessa maneira, é proposto que o ativismo judicial seja a modificação intencional das competências por parte do juiz por meio de suas decisões. Para chegar a esse resultado, foi necessário dividir o texto em duas seções. Na primeira parte, são resumidas as principais teorias sobre o ativismo judicial; em seguida, é feita uma crítica às teorias sobre o ativismo judicial expostas com base em críticas individuais e gerais; a partir disso, são propostos os desiderata que uma definição de ativismo judicial deve cumprir.Este escrito está dividido en dos partes y, en pocas palabras, es un trabajo sobre el concepto de activismo judicial. En concreto, ofrece una definición del activismo judicial desde una teoría particular de las normas de competencia. Dicha teoría es la Eugenio Bulygin, quien explica las normas de competencia a partir de las reglas constitutivas. De esta manera, se propone que el activismo judicial es la modificación intencional de las competencias por parte del juez a través de sus decisiones. Para llegar a este resultado fue necesario dividir el escrito en dos partes. En este artículo se presenta la primera parte, en la cual se resumen las principales teorías sobre el activismo judicial; luego se hace una crítica a las teorías sobre activismo judicial expuestas a partir de críticas individuales y generales; a partir de esto se proponen los desiderata que debe cumplir una definición de activismo judicial.2022text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8533142(Revista) ISSN 0120-8942Díkaion: revista de actualidad jurídica, ISSN 0120-8942, Vol. 31, Nº. 1, 2022, pags. 70-92spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|