El conocimiento experto en las decisiones judiciales: Casos ambientales colombianos
Objective: To analyze the valuation criteria used by judges when using expert knowledge in certain environmental protection cases. Methodology: This study is designed with qualitative considerations about the valuation criteria used by judges to validate expert knowledge in Colombian environmental l...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8532452 |
| Source: | DIXI, ISSN 0124-7255, null 24, Nº. 2, 2022, pags. 1-16 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001541598
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
DIXI, ISSN 0124-7255, null 24, Nº. 2, 2022, pags. 1-16
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
conocimiento científico
derecho ambiental derechos de la naturaleza principio de precaución Scientific knowledge environmental law rights of nature precautionary principle Conhecimento científico direito ambiental direitos da natureza princípio da precaução |
| spellingShingle |
conocimiento científico
derecho ambiental derechos de la naturaleza principio de precaución Scientific knowledge environmental law rights of nature precautionary principle Conhecimento científico direito ambiental direitos da natureza princípio da precaução Gaitán Reyes, Julián Andrés El conocimiento experto en las decisiones judiciales: Casos ambientales colombianos |
| description |
Objective: To analyze the valuation criteria used by judges when using expert knowledge in certain environmental protection cases.
Methodology: This study is designed with qualitative considerations about the valuation criteria used by judges to validate expert knowledge in Colombian environmental law court rulings. A specific unit of a population universe was analyzed, in order to construct categories of analysis from documentary sources obtained from the Colombian High Courts' consultation system, under a non-probabilistic sampling.
Results: The ways in which judges used expert knowledge were identified and the criteria for weighting the use of expert knowledge in the judicial decisions under study were established.
Conclusions: The evaluation criteria used by judges to validate expert knowledge in judicial decisions on Colombian environmental law were: suitability of the experts and reliability of the expert information, due to the fact that they come from state sources that are accepted by the scientific community.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Gaitán Reyes, Julián Andrés
|
| author_facet |
Gaitán Reyes, Julián Andrés
|
| author_sort |
Gaitán Reyes, Julián Andrés
|
| title |
El conocimiento experto en las decisiones judiciales: Casos ambientales colombianos
|
| title_short |
El conocimiento experto en las decisiones judiciales: Casos ambientales colombianos
|
| title_full |
El conocimiento experto en las decisiones judiciales: Casos ambientales colombianos
|
| title_fullStr |
El conocimiento experto en las decisiones judiciales: Casos ambientales colombianos
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
El conocimiento experto en las decisiones judiciales: Casos ambientales colombianos
|
| title_sort |
el conocimiento experto en las decisiones judiciales: casos ambientales colombianos
|
| publishDate |
2022
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8532452
|
| _version_ |
1740986960150790144
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015415982022-08-10El conocimiento experto en las decisiones judiciales: Casos ambientales colombianosGaitán Reyes, Julián Andrésconocimiento científicoderecho ambientalderechos de la naturalezaprincipio de precauciónScientific knowledgeenvironmental lawrights of natureprecautionary principleConhecimento científicodireito ambientaldireitos da naturezaprincípio da precauçãoObjective: To analyze the valuation criteria used by judges when using expert knowledge in certain environmental protection cases. Methodology: This study is designed with qualitative considerations about the valuation criteria used by judges to validate expert knowledge in Colombian environmental law court rulings. A specific unit of a population universe was analyzed, in order to construct categories of analysis from documentary sources obtained from the Colombian High Courts' consultation system, under a non-probabilistic sampling. Results: The ways in which judges used expert knowledge were identified and the criteria for weighting the use of expert knowledge in the judicial decisions under study were established. Conclusions: The evaluation criteria used by judges to validate expert knowledge in judicial decisions on Colombian environmental law were: suitability of the experts and reliability of the expert information, due to the fact that they come from state sources that are accepted by the scientific community.Objetivo: Analisar os critérios de avaliação utilizados pelos juízes ao utilizar o conhecimento especializado em certos casos de proteção ambiental. Metodologia: Este estudo foi elaborado com considerações qualitativas sobre os critérios de avaliação utilizados pelos juízes para validar o conhecimento especializado nas decisões dos tribunais colombianos de direito ambiental. Uma unidade específica de um universo populacional foi analisada a fim de construir categorias de análise baseadas em fontes documentais obtidas do sistema de consulta dos Tribunais Superiores da Colômbia, sob amostragem não-probabilística. Resultados: Foram identificadas as formas pelas quais os juízes utilizaram o conhecimento especializado e foram estabelecidos os critérios para ponderar o uso do conhecimento especializado nas decisões judiciais em estudo. Conclusões: Os critérios de avaliação utilizados pelos juízes para validar os conhecimentos dos especialistas nas decisões judiciais sobre o direito ambiental colombiano foram: a idoneidade dos especialistas e a confiabilidade das informações dos especialistas, devido ao fato de que eles vêm de fontes estatais que são aceitas pela comunidade científica.Objetivo: analizar los criterios de valoración que utilizan los jueces al usar el conocimiento experto en ciertas causas de protección del medio ambiente. Metodología: el presente estudio está diseñado con consideraciones cualitativas acerca de los criterios de valoración que utilizan los jueces para validar el conocimiento experto en las sentencias judiciales de derecho ambiental colombiano. Se analizó una unidad específica de un universo poblacional, con el fin de construir categorías de análisis a partir de fuentes documentales obtenidas del sistema de consulta de las altas Cortes colombianas, bajo un muestreo no probabilístico. Resultados: se identificaron las formas como los jueces acudieron al conocimiento experto y se establecieron los criterios de ponderación de uso del conocimiento experto en las decisiones judiciales objeto de estudio. Conclusiones: los criterios de valoración que utilizan los jueces para validar el conocimiento experto en las sentencias judiciales de derecho ambiental colombiano fueron: idoneidad de los expertos y confiabilidad de la información experta, debido a que provienen de fuentes estatales que gozan de aceptación en la comunidad científica.2022text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8532452(Revista) ISSN 0124-7255DIXI, ISSN 0124-7255, null 24, Nº. 2, 2022, pags. 1-16spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|