Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata
Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most widespread therapeutic options for treating localized prostate cancer. RP has been a surgical technique in constant development, the application of robotic technology in clinical practice has occurred in recent decades. Although the initial application o...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8512305 |
| Source: | RECIMUNDO: Revista Científica de la Investigación y el Conocimiento, ISSN 2588-073X, Vol. 6, Nº. 3, 2022, pags. 183-191 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001539852
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
RECIMUNDO: Revista Científica de la Investigación y el Conocimiento, ISSN 2588-073X, Vol. 6, Nº. 3, 2022, pags. 183-191
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Robótica
Laparoscopia Próstata Da Vinci Cirugía Robotics Laparoscopy Prostate Da Vinci Surgery |
| spellingShingle |
Robótica
Laparoscopia Próstata Da Vinci Cirugía Robotics Laparoscopy Prostate Da Vinci Surgery López Toledo, María Gracia Granda Pozo, Katherine Silvana Carrión Vega, George Terry Mayo Jácome, Juan Carlos Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata |
| description |
Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most widespread therapeutic options for treating localized prostate cancer. RP has been a surgical technique in constant development, the application of robotic technology in clinical practice has occurred in recent decades. Although the initial application of robotics in medicine was extremely diverse, the main impact of this fascinating technology was in the assistance of minimally invasive surgeries. The methodology used for this research work is part of a bibliographic review of documentary type, since we are going to deal with issues raised at a theoretical level such as traditional surgery vs. robotic surgery for prostate tumors. Management and complications. The technique for data collection is made up of electronic materials, the latter such as Google Scholar, PubMed, among others, relying on the use of descriptors in health sciences or MESH terminology. The information obtained here will be reviewed for further analysis. In the bibliography consulted, robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy compared with normal and open laparoscopic prosta-tectomy, has high results in terms of fewer complications, hospital stay, among others, because it is minimally invasive, eliminating the complications of conventional laparoscopy, such as visualization , hand-eye coordination and the limitations of manual movement, generating comfort for surgeons in surgeries for patients with minimal incisions, less anesthesia, less blood loss. However, robotic surgery has a high cost, which makes it have a low demand compared to laparoscopic surgery, much more accessible and also with good post-operative results and lastly, traditional open prostatectomy, last within the field of choice. for their results in terms of complications and other variables.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
López Toledo, María Gracia
Granda Pozo, Katherine Silvana Carrión Vega, George Terry Mayo Jácome, Juan Carlos |
| author_facet |
López Toledo, María Gracia
Granda Pozo, Katherine Silvana Carrión Vega, George Terry Mayo Jácome, Juan Carlos |
| author_sort |
López Toledo, María Gracia
|
| title |
Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata
|
| title_short |
Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata
|
| title_full |
Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata
|
| title_fullStr |
Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata
|
| title_sort |
cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata
|
| publishDate |
2022
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8512305
|
| _version_ |
1767464032763117568
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015398522023-05-30Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstataLópez Toledo, María GraciaGranda Pozo, Katherine SilvanaCarrión Vega, George TerryMayo Jácome, Juan CarlosRobóticaLaparoscopiaPróstataDa VinciCirugíaRoboticsLaparoscopyProstateDa VinciSurgeryRadical Prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most widespread therapeutic options for treating localized prostate cancer. RP has been a surgical technique in constant development, the application of robotic technology in clinical practice has occurred in recent decades. Although the initial application of robotics in medicine was extremely diverse, the main impact of this fascinating technology was in the assistance of minimally invasive surgeries. The methodology used for this research work is part of a bibliographic review of documentary type, since we are going to deal with issues raised at a theoretical level such as traditional surgery vs. robotic surgery for prostate tumors. Management and complications. The technique for data collection is made up of electronic materials, the latter such as Google Scholar, PubMed, among others, relying on the use of descriptors in health sciences or MESH terminology. The information obtained here will be reviewed for further analysis. In the bibliography consulted, robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy compared with normal and open laparoscopic prosta-tectomy, has high results in terms of fewer complications, hospital stay, among others, because it is minimally invasive, eliminating the complications of conventional laparoscopy, such as visualization , hand-eye coordination and the limitations of manual movement, generating comfort for surgeons in surgeries for patients with minimal incisions, less anesthesia, less blood loss. However, robotic surgery has a high cost, which makes it have a low demand compared to laparoscopic surgery, much more accessible and also with good post-operative results and lastly, traditional open prostatectomy, last within the field of choice. for their results in terms of complications and other variables.La Prostatectomía Radical (PR) es una de las opciones terapéuticas más extendidas como tratamiento del cáncer de próstata localizado. La PR ha sido una técnica quirúrgica en constante desarrollo, la aplicación de la tecnología robótica en la práctica clínica se produjo en las últimas décadas. Aunque la aplicación inicial de la robótica en medicina fue sumamente diversa, el principal impacto de esta tecnología fascinante se dio en la asistencia de cirugías mínimamente invasivas. La metodología utilizada para el presente trabajo de investigación, se enmarca dentro de una revisión bibliográfica de tipo documental, ya que nos vamos a ocupar de temas planteados a nivel teórico como es Cirugía tradicional vs cirugía robótica de tumores en próstata. Manejo y complicaciones. La técnica para la recolección de datos está constituida por materiales electrónicos, estos últimos como Google Académico, PubMed, entre otros, apoyándose para ello en el uso de descriptores en ciencias de la salud o terminología MESH. La información aquí obtenida será revisada para su posterior análisis. En la bibliografía consultada la prostatectomía laparoscópica robótica comparada con la prostatectomía laparoscópica normal y abierta, tiene resultados elevados en lo que respecta a menores complicaciones, estancia hospitalaria, entre otros, por ser mínimamente invasiva, eliminando las complicaciones de la laparoscopia convencional como, la visualización, la coordinación manos-ojos y las limitaciones del movimiento manual, generando un confort para los cirujanos en las cirugías para los pacientes con incisiones mínimas, menos anestesia, menor pérdida de sangre. Sin embargo, la cirugía robótica tiene un alto coste, lo que la hace tener una demanda baja con respecto a la cirugía laparoscópica, mucho más accesible y también con buenos resultados post operatorios y de ultima la prostatectomía tradicional abierta, ultima dentro de ámbito de escogencia por sus resultados en cuanto a complicaciones y otras variables.2022text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8512305(Revista) ISSN 2588-073XRECIMUNDO: Revista Científica de la Investigación y el Conocimiento, ISSN 2588-073X, Vol. 6, Nº. 3, 2022, pags. 183-191spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|