Colegios profesionales, relaciones colegiales y potestad sancionadora
Regardless of doctrinal discussions about Peruvian ordainment, it is undoubtedly deducedthat Professional Schools and public Administrations.The juridical relationship between collegiate and School is regarded, in Spanish jurisprudence,as “special subjection relationship”, typically “domestic”, cate...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2013
|
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8472334 |
| Source: | Revista de Derecho, ISSN 1608-1714, Vol. 14, Vol 1, 2013 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista de Derecho), pags. 11-35 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001533805
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015338052022-06-14Colegios profesionales, relaciones colegiales y potestad sancionadoraSanz Rubiales, ÍñigoRegardless of doctrinal discussions about Peruvian ordainment, it is undoubtedly deducedthat Professional Schools and public Administrations.The juridical relationship between collegiate and School is regarded, in Spanish jurisprudence,as “special subjection relationship”, typically “domestic”, category usedtraditionally to justify limitation of rights; however, the Peruvian constitutional Courtdoes not assume this doctrine. This work demonstrates that the licit flexibility of theprinciple of legality derives from the corporate-representative constitution of schools.Consequently, collegiate sanctions cannot be identified with disciplinary sanctions ofthe personnel. After certain doubts, the Constitutional court states with good criteriathe compatibility of both, derived from the diversity of juridical goods protected.A pesar de las discusiones doctrinales, del ordenamiento peruano se deduce indudablementeque los Colegios profesionales son Administraciones públicas.La relación jurídica entre colegiados y Colegio se viene calificando, en la jurisprudenciaespañola, como “relación especial de sujeción”, típicamente “doméstica”, categoríautilizada tradicionalmente para justificar limitaciones de derechos; sin embargo, elTribunal Constitucional peruano no asume esta doctrina. En el trabajo se demuestraque la lícita flexibilización del principio de legalidad en estas relaciones deriva de laconstitución corporativo-representativa de los colegios.En consecuencia, las sanciones colegiales no se pueden identificar con las sancionesdisciplinarias de personal. Tras algunos titubeos, el Tribunal Constitucional afirma conbuen criterio la compatibilidad de ambas, derivada de la diversidad de bienes jurídicosprotegidos.2013text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8472334(Revista) ISSN 1608-1714Revista de Derecho, ISSN 1608-1714, Vol. 14, Vol 1, 2013 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista de Derecho), pags. 11-35spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista de Derecho, ISSN 1608-1714, Vol. 14, Vol 1, 2013 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista de Derecho), pags. 11-35
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| description |
Regardless of doctrinal discussions about Peruvian ordainment, it is undoubtedly deducedthat Professional Schools and public Administrations.The juridical relationship between collegiate and School is regarded, in Spanish jurisprudence,as “special subjection relationship”, typically “domestic”, category usedtraditionally to justify limitation of rights; however, the Peruvian constitutional Courtdoes not assume this doctrine. This work demonstrates that the licit flexibility of theprinciple of legality derives from the corporate-representative constitution of schools.Consequently, collegiate sanctions cannot be identified with disciplinary sanctions ofthe personnel. After certain doubts, the Constitutional court states with good criteriathe compatibility of both, derived from the diversity of juridical goods protected.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Sanz Rubiales, Íñigo
|
| spellingShingle |
Sanz Rubiales, Íñigo
Colegios profesionales, relaciones colegiales y potestad sancionadora |
| author_facet |
Sanz Rubiales, Íñigo
|
| author_sort |
Sanz Rubiales, Íñigo
|
| title |
Colegios profesionales, relaciones colegiales y potestad sancionadora
|
| title_short |
Colegios profesionales, relaciones colegiales y potestad sancionadora
|
| title_full |
Colegios profesionales, relaciones colegiales y potestad sancionadora
|
| title_fullStr |
Colegios profesionales, relaciones colegiales y potestad sancionadora
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Colegios profesionales, relaciones colegiales y potestad sancionadora
|
| title_sort |
colegios profesionales, relaciones colegiales y potestad sancionadora
|
| publishDate |
2013
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8472334
|
| _version_ |
1735732241931173888
|