Apuntes constitucionales sobre el pin parental

This paper explores from a juridic-constitutional perspective the so-called parental pin —a type of parental veto—, taking into consideration its implementation in the Region of Murcia and its possible extension to different communities governed by the Partido Popular (PP) with the support of Vox. I...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gómez Abeja, Laura
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8416124
Source:Revista española de derecho constitucional, ISSN 0211-5743, Año nº 42, Nº 124, 2022, pags. 203-225
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001527686
record_format
dialnet
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Revista española de derecho constitucional, ISSN 0211-5743, Año nº 42, Nº 124, 2022, pags. 203-225
language
Spanish
topic
Pin parental
educación
valores democráticos
menores
Parental PIN
education
democratic values
minors
spellingShingle
Pin parental
educación
valores democráticos
menores
Parental PIN
education
democratic values
minors
Gómez Abeja, Laura
Apuntes constitucionales sobre el pin parental
description
This paper explores from a juridic-constitutional perspective the so-called parental pin —a type of parental veto—, taking into consideration its implementation in the Region of Murcia and its possible extension to different communities governed by the Partido Popular (PP) with the support of Vox. Its adoption is promoted against the so-called complementary activities. Supporters of the parental pin consider it a way to prevent minors from accessing certain contents (such as sexual education or sexual diversity) and to avoid their indoctrination. These pages recall the case law that supports (from art. 27.2 of the Spanish Constitution) the legitimacy of training in democratic values and the search for adherence of students to those values. The teaching staff is also allowed by art. 27.2 to proceed to the mere presentation of other ideas, thoughts, and ways of living coexisting in the plural and diverse society of a democratic State, even when there is no social consensus about them. In light of the foregoing, the adoption of a parental veto allowed by art. 27.3 of the Constitution cannot be accepted. The education of minors could become just an instruction to suit to the parents’ beliefs to the point of eliminating the necessary contents needed to give citizens an adequate and comprehensive education.
format
Article
author
Gómez Abeja, Laura
author_facet
Gómez Abeja, Laura
author_sort
Gómez Abeja, Laura
title
Apuntes constitucionales sobre el pin parental
title_short
Apuntes constitucionales sobre el pin parental
title_full
Apuntes constitucionales sobre el pin parental
title_fullStr
Apuntes constitucionales sobre el pin parental
title_full_unstemmed
Apuntes constitucionales sobre el pin parental
title_sort
apuntes constitucionales sobre el pin parental
publishDate
2022
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8416124
_version_
1732017760210255872
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015276862022-05-04Apuntes constitucionales sobre el pin parentalGómez Abeja, LauraPin parentaleducaciónvalores democráticosmenoresParental PINeducationdemocratic valuesminorsThis paper explores from a juridic-constitutional perspective the so-called parental pin —a type of parental veto—, taking into consideration its implementation in the Region of Murcia and its possible extension to different communities governed by the Partido Popular (PP) with the support of Vox. Its adoption is promoted against the so-called complementary activities. Supporters of the parental pin consider it a way to prevent minors from accessing certain contents (such as sexual education or sexual diversity) and to avoid their indoctrination. These pages recall the case law that supports (from art. 27.2 of the Spanish Constitution) the legitimacy of training in democratic values and the search for adherence of students to those values. The teaching staff is also allowed by art. 27.2 to proceed to the mere presentation of other ideas, thoughts, and ways of living coexisting in the plural and diverse society of a democratic State, even when there is no social consensus about them. In light of the foregoing, the adoption of a parental veto allowed by art. 27.3 of the Constitution cannot be accepted. The education of minors could become just an instruction to suit to the parents’ beliefs to the point of eliminating the necessary contents needed to give citizens an adequate and comprehensive education.En estas líneas se efectúa una reflexión jurídico-constitucional sobre el llamado pin parental, al hilo de su inicial implantación en la Comunidad de Murcia y su posible establecimiento en otras comunidades gobernadas por el PP con el necesario respaldo de Vox, que promueve su adopción frente a las conocidas —en el ámbito educativo— como actividades complementarias. Se pretende evitar que los alumnos menores accedan a determinados contenidos (como la educación sexual o la diversidad sexual), entendiendo que es una forma de impedir que se les adoctrine. En estas páginas se recuerda la jurisprudencia que avala, ex art. 27.2 CE, la legitimidad de la formación en valores democráticos y de la búsqueda de adhesión de los alumnos a esos valores. Y se recuerda también la legitimidad de la exposición por parte del profesorado de otras ideas, sobre las que no hay consenso social, pero que coexisten en una sociedad plural y diversa como es la propia de un Estado democrático. A la luz de cuanto antecede, debe rechazarse la adopción de un veto o pin parental al amparo del art. 27.3 CE, que podría convertir la educación de los menores en una formación a gusto de los padres hasta el punto de horadar los contenidos necesarios para una adecuada formación integral desde la perspectiva del art. 27.2 CE.2022text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8416124(Revista) ISSN 0211-5743Revista española de derecho constitucional, ISSN 0211-5743, Año nº 42, Nº 124, 2022, pags. 203-225spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI