Comportamiento discursivo del enunciado “territorio ancestral” en las sentencias de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia
Discursive hegemony has made it impossible for indigenous people to express themselves in their own terms; however, in the unfinished exercise of the disputes for the power to speak, they have been conditioned to enter the struggles of the legal field that, even imposing rules beyond their own contr...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Idioma: | Castellano |
| Publicado: |
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8409284 |
| Fuente: | Estudios de derecho, ISSN 0120-1867, Vol. 78, Nº. 172, 2021, pags. 250-280 |
| Etiquetas: |
Añadir etiqueta
Sin etiquetas: Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001527242
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Estudios de derecho, ISSN 0120-1867, Vol. 78, Nº. 172, 2021, pags. 250-280
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
análisis del discurso
territorio ancestral pueblos indígenas Corte Constitucional de Colombia discourse analysis ancestral territory indigenous peoples Introduction Colombian Constitutional Court Comportamento discursivo do enunciado “território ancestral” nas sentenças do supremo tribunal federal da colômbia Análise do discurso Território ancestral Povos indígenas Supremo Tribunal Federal da Colômbia |
| spellingShingle |
análisis del discurso
territorio ancestral pueblos indígenas Corte Constitucional de Colombia discourse analysis ancestral territory indigenous peoples Introduction Colombian Constitutional Court Comportamento discursivo do enunciado “território ancestral” nas sentenças do supremo tribunal federal da colômbia Análise do discurso Território ancestral Povos indígenas Supremo Tribunal Federal da Colômbia Barbosa Becerra, Joice Johanna María Comportamiento discursivo del enunciado “territorio ancestral” en las sentencias de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia |
| description |
Discursive hegemony has made it impossible for indigenous people to express themselves in their own terms; however, in the unfinished exercise of the disputes for the power to speak, they have been conditioned to enter the struggles of the legal field that, even imposing rules beyond their own control. Cultural, political and legal practices constitute a strategy for the expansion and guarantees of their human rights. In this article, we present part of the results of the critical analysis of the discourse of the judgments of the Colombian Constitutional Court, which ruled in favor of the prior, free and informed consultation, specifically the analysis of the discursive behavior of the statement “ancestral territory”. The disputes over the power to speak, of indigenous people and a Court with a rights approach, have gradually sought to permeate the harsh discourses of the legal field with ancestralism. However, although the Court decided to grant the protection of the right to prior consultation, in the follow-up of the cases, it was found that the consultations were not carried out and, for the most part, there was a deepening of the problems that were being resolved; because the causes of territorial conflict remain intact.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Barbosa Becerra, Joice Johanna María
|
| author_facet |
Barbosa Becerra, Joice Johanna María
|
| author_sort |
Barbosa Becerra, Joice Johanna María
|
| title |
Comportamiento discursivo del enunciado “territorio ancestral” en las sentencias de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia
|
| title_short |
Comportamiento discursivo del enunciado “territorio ancestral” en las sentencias de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia
|
| title_full |
Comportamiento discursivo del enunciado “territorio ancestral” en las sentencias de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia
|
| title_fullStr |
Comportamiento discursivo del enunciado “territorio ancestral” en las sentencias de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comportamiento discursivo del enunciado “territorio ancestral” en las sentencias de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia
|
| title_sort |
comportamiento discursivo del enunciado “territorio ancestral” en las sentencias de la corte constitucional de colombia
|
| publishDate |
2021
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8409284
|
| _version_ |
1731474174411538432
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015272422022-04-28Comportamiento discursivo del enunciado “territorio ancestral” en las sentencias de la Corte Constitucional de ColombiaBarbosa Becerra, Joice Johanna Maríaanálisis del discursoterritorio ancestralpueblos indígenasCorte Constitucional de Colombiadiscourse analysisancestral territoryindigenous peoplesIntroductionColombian Constitutional CourtComportamento discursivo do enunciado “território ancestral” nas sentenças do supremo tribunal federal da colômbiaAnálise do discursoTerritório ancestralPovos indígenasSupremo Tribunal Federal da ColômbiaDiscursive hegemony has made it impossible for indigenous people to express themselves in their own terms; however, in the unfinished exercise of the disputes for the power to speak, they have been conditioned to enter the struggles of the legal field that, even imposing rules beyond their own control. Cultural, political and legal practices constitute a strategy for the expansion and guarantees of their human rights. In this article, we present part of the results of the critical analysis of the discourse of the judgments of the Colombian Constitutional Court, which ruled in favor of the prior, free and informed consultation, specifically the analysis of the discursive behavior of the statement “ancestral territory”. The disputes over the power to speak, of indigenous people and a Court with a rights approach, have gradually sought to permeate the harsh discourses of the legal field with ancestralism. However, although the Court decided to grant the protection of the right to prior consultation, in the follow-up of the cases, it was found that the consultations were not carried out and, for the most part, there was a deepening of the problems that were being resolved; because the causes of territorial conflict remain intact.A hegemonia discursiva tem impossibilitado aos povos indígenas expressar-se em seus próprios termos, porém, o exercício inacabado das disputas pelo direito de poder dizer, viu-se condicionado a entrar nas lutas do campo jurídico que, mesmo que impondo regras alheias às suas práticas culturais, políticas e do direito próprio, se constituem numa estratégia para a ampliação e garantias de seus direitos humanos. Neste artigo, apresentamos uma parte dos resultados da análise crítica do discurso das sentenças do Supremo Tribunal Federal da Colômbia, que decidiu a favor da Consulta Prévia, livre e informada, especificamente a análise do comportamento discursivo do enunciado “Território ancestral”. As disputas pelo poder dizer dos povos indígenas e o Supremo Tribunal Federal com abordagem legal, têm procurado, gradualmente, permear de ancestralidade os ásperos discursos do campo jurídico. Porém, ainda que o Supremo Tribunal Federal decidiu outorgar o amparo do direito de consulta prévia, no seguimento dos casos, foi detectado que as consultas não foram realizadas, e que na maioria delas, houve um aprofundamento das problemáticas que se pretendia resolver; motivo pelo qual as causas do conflito territorial permanecem intactas.La hegemonía discursiva ha imposibilitado a los pueblos indígenas expresarse en sus propios términos, sin embargo, en el ejercicio inacabado de las disputas por el poder decir, se han visto condicionados a entrar en las luchas del campo jurídico que, aun imponiendo reglas ajenas a sus prácticas culturales, políticas y del derecho propio, se constituyen en una estrategia para la ampliación y garantías de sus derechos humanos. En este artículo, se presenta parte de los resultados del análisis crítico del discurso de las sentencias de la Corte Constitucional colombiana, que fallaron a favor de la Consulta Previa, libre e informada, específicamente el análisis del comportamiento discursivo del enunciado “territorio ancestral”. Las disputas por el poder decir, de los pueblos indígenas y una Corte con enfoque de derechos, han procurado, paulatinamente, permear de ancestralidad los discursos duros del campo jurídico. Sin embargo, aunque la Corte resolvió otorgar el amparo del derecho de consulta previa, en el seguimiento a los casos se encontró que las consultas no fueron llevadas a cabo y, en su mayoría, hubo una profundización de las problemáticas que se intentaban resolver, debido a que las causas de la conflictividad territorial permanecen intactas.2021text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8409284(Revista) ISSN 0120-1867Estudios de derecho, ISSN 0120-1867, Vol. 78, Nº. 172, 2021, pags. 250-280spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|