Pluralismo jurídico: avances constitucionales actuales
The recognition of legal pluralism by International Law on Human Rights, especially by Convention 169 of the ILO, as well as its positivization in the Constitutions of some Latin American States, allows us to affirm that this principle must move from its foundational phase to the phase of its consol...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8404422 |
Source: | FORO: Revista de Derecho, ISSN 2631-2484, Nº. 36, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Derecho y nuevas tecnologías), pags. 193-211 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001526918
|
---|---|
record_format |
dialnet
|
spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015269182023-04-14Pluralismo jurídico: avances constitucionales actualesCantillo Pushaina, Juan JoséderechosistemaspluralismodiálogojurisdiccióntransicionalpueblosindígenaslawsystemspluralismdialoguejurisdictiontransitionalpeoplesindigenousThe recognition of legal pluralism by International Law on Human Rights, especially by Convention 169 of the ILO, as well as its positivization in the Constitutions of some Latin American States, allows us to affirm that this principle must move from its foundational phase to the phase of its consolidation. This article aims to describe the current perspective with which legal pluralism is studied, showing a problem of approach based on the lack of coordination and articulation between legal science, legal sociology and legal anthropology, causing a crisis and a stagnation in the development of the concept. The solution, of course, is that the study of legal pluralism must be carried out from the perspective of law. This is the only way to facilitate a normative and interjurisdictional dialogue between indigenous law and State law in the strict sense, which will make legal pluralism effective. In Colombia, the Special Jurisdiction for Peace is an example of this beginning of dialogue between jurisdictions.El reconocimiento del pluralismo jurídico por el Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos, especialmente por el Convenio 169 de la OIT, así como su positivización en las Constituciones de algunos Estados de América Latina, permiten afirmar que este principio debe transitar de su fase fundacional a la fase de su consolidación. Este artículo pretende, por medio de un método exploratorio y de-ductivo, describir la actual perspectiva con la que se estudia el pluralismo jurídico evidenciando un problema de abordaje desde la ciencia jurídica, puesto que la sociología y la antropología jurídica que lo estudian actualmente no consultan el derecho, originando una crisis y un estancamiento en el desarrollo del concepto. La solución, evidente, es que el estudio del pluralismo jurídico debe realizarse normativamente desde la perspectiva del derecho. Solo así se facilitará el diálogo normativo e interjurisdiccional entre el derecho indígena y el derecho estatal en sentido estricto, que efectivice el pluralismo jurídico. En Colombia, la Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz es una muestra de ese inicio de diálogo entre jurisdicciones.2021text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8404422(Revista) ISSN 1390-2466(Revista) ISSN 2631-2484FORO: Revista de Derecho, ISSN 2631-2484, Nº. 36, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Derecho y nuevas tecnologías), pags. 193-211spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
institution |
Dialnet
|
collection |
Dialnet AR
|
source |
FORO: Revista de Derecho, ISSN 2631-2484, Nº. 36, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Derecho y nuevas tecnologías), pags. 193-211
|
language |
Spanish
|
topic |
derecho
sistemas pluralismo diálogo jurisdicción transicional pueblos indígenas law systems pluralism dialogue jurisdiction transitional peoples indigenous |
spellingShingle |
derecho
sistemas pluralismo diálogo jurisdicción transicional pueblos indígenas law systems pluralism dialogue jurisdiction transitional peoples indigenous Cantillo Pushaina, Juan José Pluralismo jurídico: avances constitucionales actuales |
description |
The recognition of legal pluralism by International Law on Human Rights, especially by Convention 169 of the ILO, as well as its positivization in the Constitutions of some Latin American States, allows us to affirm that this principle must move from its foundational phase to the phase of its consolidation. This article aims to describe the current perspective with which legal pluralism is studied, showing a problem of approach based on the lack of coordination and articulation between legal science, legal sociology and legal anthropology, causing a crisis and a stagnation in the development of the concept. The solution, of course, is that the study of legal pluralism must be carried out from the perspective of law. This is the only way to facilitate a normative and interjurisdictional dialogue between indigenous law and State law in the strict sense, which will make legal pluralism effective. In Colombia, the Special Jurisdiction for Peace is an example of this beginning of dialogue between jurisdictions.
|
format |
Article
|
author |
Cantillo Pushaina, Juan José
|
author_facet |
Cantillo Pushaina, Juan José
|
author_sort |
Cantillo Pushaina, Juan José
|
title |
Pluralismo jurídico: avances constitucionales actuales
|
title_short |
Pluralismo jurídico: avances constitucionales actuales
|
title_full |
Pluralismo jurídico: avances constitucionales actuales
|
title_fullStr |
Pluralismo jurídico: avances constitucionales actuales
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Pluralismo jurídico: avances constitucionales actuales
|
title_sort |
pluralismo jurídico: avances constitucionales actuales
|
publishDate |
2021
|
url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8404422
|
_version_ |
1763296477578264576
|