Subjetividad de las máquinas en toma de decisiones judiciales
The questioning of the subjectivity of the legal agent who, executing their work and based on judicial discretion, prints particular aspects such as emotions, typi-cal of the human essence in the sentence, is the central theme of this article. With the implementation of new actors such as digital ju...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8404413 |
| Source: | FORO: Revista de Derecho, ISSN 2631-2484, Nº. 36, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Derecho y nuevas tecnologías), pags. 9-27 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001526909
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
FORO: Revista de Derecho, ISSN 2631-2484, Nº. 36, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Derecho y nuevas tecnologías), pags. 9-27
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
decisiones
empatía emociones ética inteligencia jueces responsabilidad subjetividad decisions empathy emotions ethics intelligence judges responsibility subjectivity |
| spellingShingle |
decisiones
empatía emociones ética inteligencia jueces responsabilidad subjetividad decisions empathy emotions ethics intelligence judges responsibility subjectivity Montañez Sierra, Cristian Fernando Subjetividad de las máquinas en toma de decisiones judiciales |
| description |
The questioning of the subjectivity of the legal agent who, executing their work and based on judicial discretion, prints particular aspects such as emotions, typi-cal of the human essence in the sentence, is the central theme of this article. With the implementation of new actors such as digital judges, these aspects acquire a relevant role for those who are now in charge of deliberating.The objective of the article is to evaluate the role of subjectivity, initially from the role of judges, to later involve artificial intelligence programmers who assist tasks in making judicial decisions. What about the subjectivity that would no longer di-rectly permeate the one in charge of judging? In other words, the empathy that the judicial agent currently generates finds new allies with whom they work together.The analysis is based on articles that deepen into issues such as judicial decisions, emotions and artificial intelligence. Topics worked from connoisseurs of scien-ces such as law and technology that unify efforts to give rise to artificial superior knowledge. When processing large volumes of information, they emanate a sen-tence, which as a doctrinal vector wishes to maintain legal certainty and comply with good practices that cause acceptance and legitimacy in society.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Montañez Sierra, Cristian Fernando
|
| author_facet |
Montañez Sierra, Cristian Fernando
|
| author_sort |
Montañez Sierra, Cristian Fernando
|
| title |
Subjetividad de las máquinas en toma de decisiones judiciales
|
| title_short |
Subjetividad de las máquinas en toma de decisiones judiciales
|
| title_full |
Subjetividad de las máquinas en toma de decisiones judiciales
|
| title_fullStr |
Subjetividad de las máquinas en toma de decisiones judiciales
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Subjetividad de las máquinas en toma de decisiones judiciales
|
| title_sort |
subjetividad de las máquinas en toma de decisiones judiciales
|
| publishDate |
2021
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8404413
|
| _version_ |
1767464018054742016
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015269092023-05-30Subjetividad de las máquinas en toma de decisiones judicialesMontañez Sierra, Cristian FernandodecisionesempatíaemocioneséticainteligenciajuecesresponsabilidadsubjetividaddecisionsempathyemotionsethicsintelligencejudgesresponsibilitysubjectivityThe questioning of the subjectivity of the legal agent who, executing their work and based on judicial discretion, prints particular aspects such as emotions, typi-cal of the human essence in the sentence, is the central theme of this article. With the implementation of new actors such as digital judges, these aspects acquire a relevant role for those who are now in charge of deliberating.The objective of the article is to evaluate the role of subjectivity, initially from the role of judges, to later involve artificial intelligence programmers who assist tasks in making judicial decisions. What about the subjectivity that would no longer di-rectly permeate the one in charge of judging? In other words, the empathy that the judicial agent currently generates finds new allies with whom they work together.The analysis is based on articles that deepen into issues such as judicial decisions, emotions and artificial intelligence. Topics worked from connoisseurs of scien-ces such as law and technology that unify efforts to give rise to artificial superior knowledge. When processing large volumes of information, they emanate a sen-tence, which as a doctrinal vector wishes to maintain legal certainty and comply with good practices that cause acceptance and legitimacy in society.El cuestionamiento de la subjetividad del agente legal que, ejecutando sus labores y basada en discrecionalidad judicial imprime aspectos particulares como emociones, propios de la esencia humana en la sentencia, es el tema central de este artículo. Con la implementación de nuevos actores como jueces digitales, estos aspectos adquieren un papel relevante por quien ahora se encarga de deliberar. El objetivo del artículo es evaluar el papel de la subjetividad, inicialmente desde el rol de jueces y/o juezas, para luego involucrar programadores y programadoras de inteligencia artificial que asisten tareas en la toma de decisiones judiciales. ¿Qué pasa con la subjetividad que ya no impregna directamente el encargado de juzgar? En otras palabras, la empatía que genera en la actualidad el agente judicial encuentra nuevos aliados con quienes trabajan mancomunadamente. El análisis está basado en artículos que profundizan temas como decisiones judiciales, emociones e inteligencia artificial. Temáticas trabajadas desde conocedores de ciencias como derecho y tecnología que unifican esfuerzos para dar origen a cono-cimiento superior artificial. Al procesar grandes volúmenes de información emanan una sentencia, que en vector doctrinal anhela mantener certeza jurídica y cumplir con buenas prácticas que ocasionen en la sociedad aceptación y legitimidad.2021text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8404413(Revista) ISSN 1390-2466(Revista) ISSN 2631-2484FORO: Revista de Derecho, ISSN 2631-2484, Nº. 36, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Derecho y nuevas tecnologías), pags. 9-27spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|