Medicina defensiva y derechos fundamentales
The public health crisis stemming from Covid-19 updates the “technocratic fallacy” by reducing ethical issues to mere technical issues. Clinical uncertainty seeks refuge in the Law and “defensive medicine” acquires a renewed force. Fundamental rights, as legal grammar of the clinical relationship...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8376381 |
| Source: | DS : Derecho y salud, ISSN 1133-7400, Vol. 31, Nº. 1, 2021, pags. 159-167 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001522411
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015224112022-04-02Medicina defensiva y derechos fundamentalesCruz-Valiño, Ana B.Confianzacovid-19derechos fundamentalesmedicina defensivareconocimientoCovid19defensive medicinefundamental rightsrecognitiontrustThe public health crisis stemming from Covid-19 updates the “technocratic fallacy” by reducing ethical issues to mere technical issues. Clinical uncertainty seeks refuge in the Law and “defensive medicine” acquires a renewed force. Fundamental rights, as legal grammar of the clinical relationship, becomes a relevant approach to analyze this medical practice. Thus, it is possible to conclude that defensive medicine violates its characterizing features and, conversely, the authentic clinical relationship, based on trust and recognition, avoids it.La crisis de salud pública derivada de la Covid-19 actualiza la “falacia tecnocrática” reduciendo los problemas éticos a meros problemas técnicos. La incertidumbre clínica busca refugio en el Derecho y la “medicina defensiva” adquiere fuerza renovada. Los derechos fundamentales, como gramática jurídica de la relación clínica, devienen un enfoque pertinente para analizar esta práctica médica, tras lo cual es posible concluir que vulnera sus notas caracterizadoras y que, por el contrario, la relación clínica auténtica, fundamentada en la confianza y el reconocimiento, evita la medicina defensiva.2021text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8376381(Revista) ISSN 1133-7400DS : Derecho y salud, ISSN 1133-7400, Vol. 31, Nº. 1, 2021, pags. 159-167spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
DS : Derecho y salud, ISSN 1133-7400, Vol. 31, Nº. 1, 2021, pags. 159-167
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Confianza
covid-19 derechos fundamentales medicina defensiva reconocimiento Covid 19 defensive medicine fundamental rights recognition trust |
| spellingShingle |
Confianza
covid-19 derechos fundamentales medicina defensiva reconocimiento Covid 19 defensive medicine fundamental rights recognition trust Cruz-Valiño, Ana B. Medicina defensiva y derechos fundamentales |
| description |
The public health crisis stemming from Covid-19 updates the “technocratic fallacy” by reducing ethical issues to mere technical issues. Clinical
uncertainty seeks refuge in the Law and “defensive
medicine” acquires a renewed force. Fundamental
rights, as legal grammar of the clinical relationship,
becomes a relevant approach to analyze this medical practice. Thus, it is possible to conclude that defensive medicine violates its characterizing features
and, conversely, the authentic clinical relationship,
based on trust and recognition, avoids it.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Cruz-Valiño, Ana B.
|
| author_facet |
Cruz-Valiño, Ana B.
|
| author_sort |
Cruz-Valiño, Ana B.
|
| title |
Medicina defensiva y derechos fundamentales
|
| title_short |
Medicina defensiva y derechos fundamentales
|
| title_full |
Medicina defensiva y derechos fundamentales
|
| title_fullStr |
Medicina defensiva y derechos fundamentales
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Medicina defensiva y derechos fundamentales
|
| title_sort |
medicina defensiva y derechos fundamentales
|
| publishDate |
2021
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8376381
|
| _version_ |
1729299844074307584
|