Eficacia de los comités de convivencia laboral como instrumento de prevención del acoso laboral en las medianas empresas del municipio de Girardot
The current article is the result of a research. Its main purpose was to analyze the work coexistence committee as a useful tool for the protection and recognition of rights of victims of work harassment in enterprises of medium level in Girardot. On the other hand, the idea is to evaluate its effec...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8352857 |
| Source: | Jurídicas CUC, ISSN 1692-3030, Vol. 17, Nº. 1, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Jurídicas CUC 2021; 499–556), pags. 589-612 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
The current article is the result of a research. Its main purpose was to analyze the work coexistence committee as a useful tool for the protection and recognition of rights of victims of work harassment in enterprises of medium level in Girardot. On the other hand, the idea is to evaluate its effectiveness and function as legal instrument. The type of research was descriptive research design and mixed method as well. The sample of the study was chosen, it was about 250 participants, 18 age average, they belong to different academic background and socio-economic level. The instruments applied were: observation no participant, focus group, semi structured interviews and surveys Likert scale. As a result, the study shows and poor efficacy in terms of legal functions, when identify that work internal rules are not different from the work coexistence committee. Another fact is the fear of social denunciation with the committee, it is due to the absent of legal protection a guarantees in favor to victims and the difficulty about probing the behavior considered as a work harassment. The conclusion of the research is that the stalker of person who shows a bullying attitude has an advantage over the victim, because of the poor impartialities could be presented when building the work coexistence committee. Likewise, the solutions between the abuser and the victims are not taken effectively to solve the problem. |
|---|