La conciliación contenciosa administrativa. Análisis desde la tutela judicial efectiva
Administrative dispute settlement is a complex procedure, which, according to statistics, does not show optimal results in producing fewer lawsuits and sentences against the State. Thus, this research aims to verify whether administrative dispute settlement follows the due process of law (DPL). We u...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8208121 |
| Source: | Prolegómenos: Derechos y valores, ISSN 0121-182X, Vol. 24, Nº. 48, 2021, pags. 93-108 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001500014
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Prolegómenos: Derechos y valores, ISSN 0121-182X, Vol. 24, Nº. 48, 2021, pags. 93-108
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
administration of justice
settlement administrative litigation due process of law administración de justicia conciliación contenciosa administrativa tutela judicial efectiva administração de justiça conciliação contenciosa administrativa tutela judicial efetiva |
| spellingShingle |
administration of justice
settlement administrative litigation due process of law administración de justicia conciliación contenciosa administrativa tutela judicial efectiva administração de justiça conciliação contenciosa administrativa tutela judicial efetiva Torres Osorio, Edilsa La conciliación contenciosa administrativa. Análisis desde la tutela judicial efectiva |
| description |
Administrative dispute settlement is a complex procedure, which, according to statistics, does not show optimal results in producing fewer lawsuits and sentences against the State. Thus, this research aims to verify whether administrative dispute settlement follows the due process of law (DPL). We use the latter as an analogy to reach our goal: 1) the right of access to jurisdiction, 2) the right to obtain a settlement procedure based on objective law, 3) the right to remedies established by law against judicial decisions, 4) the right to execute settlement agreement certificates, 5) the right to the unchangeability of the agreements reached, and 6) the right not to be defenseless in the settle- ment process. We found that two of the listed guarantees are violated. The first is that Article 243 (4) of the Code of Administrative Procedure and Administrative Litigation does not allow the parties in conflict to appeal the order that approves or denies the agreement ratification. The second is that less than 30 % of the agreements are ratified due to the complexity of the procedure, rendering the conflict resolution mechanism ineffective.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Torres Osorio, Edilsa
|
| author_facet |
Torres Osorio, Edilsa
|
| author_sort |
Torres Osorio, Edilsa
|
| title |
La conciliación contenciosa administrativa. Análisis desde la tutela judicial efectiva
|
| title_short |
La conciliación contenciosa administrativa. Análisis desde la tutela judicial efectiva
|
| title_full |
La conciliación contenciosa administrativa. Análisis desde la tutela judicial efectiva
|
| title_fullStr |
La conciliación contenciosa administrativa. Análisis desde la tutela judicial efectiva
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
La conciliación contenciosa administrativa. Análisis desde la tutela judicial efectiva
|
| title_sort |
la conciliación contenciosa administrativa. análisis desde la tutela judicial efectiva
|
| publishDate |
2021
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8208121
|
| _version_ |
1721240501289484288
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015000142022-01-04La conciliación contenciosa administrativa. Análisis desde la tutela judicial efectivaTorres Osorio, Edilsaadministration of justicesettlementadministrative litigationdue process of lawadministración de justiciaconciliacióncontenciosa administrativatutela judicial efectivaadministração de justiçaconciliaçãocontenciosa administrativatutela judicial efetivaAdministrative dispute settlement is a complex procedure, which, according to statistics, does not show optimal results in producing fewer lawsuits and sentences against the State. Thus, this research aims to verify whether administrative dispute settlement follows the due process of law (DPL). We use the latter as an analogy to reach our goal: 1) the right of access to jurisdiction, 2) the right to obtain a settlement procedure based on objective law, 3) the right to remedies established by law against judicial decisions, 4) the right to execute settlement agreement certificates, 5) the right to the unchangeability of the agreements reached, and 6) the right not to be defenseless in the settle- ment process. We found that two of the listed guarantees are violated. The first is that Article 243 (4) of the Code of Administrative Procedure and Administrative Litigation does not allow the parties in conflict to appeal the order that approves or denies the agreement ratification. The second is that less than 30 % of the agreements are ratified due to the complexity of the procedure, rendering the conflict resolution mechanism ineffective.A conciliação contenciosa administrativa é um procedimento complexo, o qual, conforme estatísticas, não mostra ótimos resultados no que diz respeito a produzir menores demandas e condenações ao Estado. Por isso, o objetivo desta pesquisa é verificar se a conciliação contenciosa administrativa cumpre com os requisitos da tutela judicial efetiva. Assim, usamos esta última por analogia para chegar ao nosso objetivo: 1) o direito de acesso à jurisdição; 2) o direito de obter um procedimento de conciliação fundado no direito objetivo; 3) o direito aos recursos que as leis estabeleçam contra as resoluções judiciais; 4) o direito à execução das atas de conciliação; 5) o direito à não modificação dos acordos estabelecidos e 6) o direito a não sofrer indefesa no processo de conciliação. Como resultado, obtém-se que são violadas duas garantias enunciadas: a primeira, que se encontra no artigo 243, numeral 4, do Código de Procedimento Administrativo e do Contencioso Administrativo, o qual não permite que as partes em conflito apelem, o auto que aprova ou denega a homologação do acordo; a segunda, pelo procedimento tão complexo, obtêm-se menos de 30 % de homologações aos acordos, o que faz do mecanismo de resolução de conflito pouco eficaz.La conciliación contenciosa administrativa es un procedimiento complejo, el cual, conforme a las estadísticas, no muestra resultados óptimos en lo que respecta a producir menores demandas y condenas al Estado. Es por esto que el propósito de esta investigación es verificar si la conciliación contenciosa administrativa cumple con los requisitos de la tutela judicial efectiva (TJE). Usamos esta última por analogía para llegar a nuestro objetivo así: 1. El derecho de acceso a la jurisdicción, 2. El derecho a obtener un procedimiento de conciliación fundado en el derecho objetivo, 3. El derecho a los recursos que las leyes establezcan contra las resoluciones judiciales, 4. El derecho a la ejecución de las actas de conciliación, 5. El derecho a la inmodificabilidad de los acuerdos logrados y 6. El derecho a no sufrir indefensión en el proceso de conciliación. Como resultado, se obtiene que se vulneran dos de las garantías enunciadas, la primera es que el artículo 243 numeral 4 del Código de Procedimiento Administrativo y de lo Contencioso Administrativo no permite apelar a las partes en conflicto, el auto que aprueba o deniega la homologación del acuerdo, y la segunda es que, por el procedimieno tan complejo, se obtienen menos del 30 % de homologaciones a los acuerdos, lo que hace del mecanismo de resolución de conflictos uno poco eficaz.2021text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8208121(Revista) ISSN 0121-182XProlegómenos: Derechos y valores, ISSN 0121-182X, Vol. 24, Nº. 48, 2021, pags. 93-108spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|