Perspectivas quanto à lavagem de provas na colaboração premiada: proposta para controle de abuso processual
This article identifies a possibility of dissimulation or concealment of the origin of unusable information in criminal proceedings as a source of evidence, in order to give an appearance of legitimacy to its origin, especially in awarded collaboration agreements. This phenomenon is dubbed “evidence...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8148615 |
| Source: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, Vol. 7, Nº. 3, 2021, pags. 2203-2243 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001494461
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, Vol. 7, Nº. 3, 2021, pags. 2203-2243
|
| language |
Portuguese
|
| topic |
Evidence laundering
Collaboration agreement Wrongful process Lavagem de provas Colaboração premiada Abuso processual |
| spellingShingle |
Evidence laundering
Collaboration agreement Wrongful process Lavagem de provas Colaboração premiada Abuso processual Brenner Lucchesi, Guilherme Vida, Lucas Gandolfi Perspectivas quanto à lavagem de provas na colaboração premiada: proposta para controle de abuso processual |
| description |
This article identifies a possibility of dissimulation or concealment of the origin of unusable information in criminal proceedings as a source of evidence, in order to give an appearance of legitimacy to its origin, especially in awarded collaboration agreements. This phenomenon is dubbed “evidence laundering” by the authors and is of yet a procedural situation that is still insufficiently discussed in legal scholarship. To analyze this phenomenon, this article begins by examining the legal nature of awarded collaboration agreements, as well as the steps of their procedure. By analyzing evidence laundering from a perspective of preserving the chain of custody of evidence, the aim is to identify the legal consequences of this phenomenon. Based on the experience of CADE’s leniency program, possible measures to control this malfeasance by the prosecution are proposed. In conclusion, the article raises the possibility of establishing a single awarded collaboration center, combined with the dissemination of good practices in negotiating deals, as means to improve the evidence arising from these agreements, bringing greater legal certainty to would-be collaborators and avoiding evidence laundering.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Brenner Lucchesi, Guilherme
Vida, Lucas Gandolfi |
| author_facet |
Brenner Lucchesi, Guilherme
Vida, Lucas Gandolfi |
| author_sort |
Brenner Lucchesi, Guilherme
|
| title |
Perspectivas quanto à lavagem de provas na colaboração premiada: proposta para controle de abuso processual
|
| title_short |
Perspectivas quanto à lavagem de provas na colaboração premiada: proposta para controle de abuso processual
|
| title_full |
Perspectivas quanto à lavagem de provas na colaboração premiada: proposta para controle de abuso processual
|
| title_fullStr |
Perspectivas quanto à lavagem de provas na colaboração premiada: proposta para controle de abuso processual
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Perspectivas quanto à lavagem de provas na colaboração premiada: proposta para controle de abuso processual
|
| title_sort |
perspectivas quanto à lavagem de provas na colaboração premiada: proposta para controle de abuso processual
|
| publishDate |
2021
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8148615
|
| _version_ |
1717979031234674688
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014944612021-11-30Perspectivas quanto à lavagem de provas na colaboração premiada: proposta para controle de abuso processualBrenner Lucchesi, GuilhermeVida, Lucas GandolfiEvidence launderingCollaboration agreementWrongful processLavagem de provasColaboração premiadaAbuso processualThis article identifies a possibility of dissimulation or concealment of the origin of unusable information in criminal proceedings as a source of evidence, in order to give an appearance of legitimacy to its origin, especially in awarded collaboration agreements. This phenomenon is dubbed “evidence laundering” by the authors and is of yet a procedural situation that is still insufficiently discussed in legal scholarship. To analyze this phenomenon, this article begins by examining the legal nature of awarded collaboration agreements, as well as the steps of their procedure. By analyzing evidence laundering from a perspective of preserving the chain of custody of evidence, the aim is to identify the legal consequences of this phenomenon. Based on the experience of CADE’s leniency program, possible measures to control this malfeasance by the prosecution are proposed. In conclusion, the article raises the possibility of establishing a single awarded collaboration center, combined with the dissemination of good practices in negotiating deals, as means to improve the evidence arising from these agreements, bringing greater legal certainty to would-be collaborators and avoiding evidence laundering.Identifica-se no processo penal a possibilidade de dissimulação ou ocultação da origem de uma informação inutilizável no processo como fonte de prova, a fim de conferir aparência de legitimidade à sua origem, especialmente em acordos de colaboração premiada. Este fenômeno é denominado pelos autores “lavagem de provas”, tratando-se de situação processual ainda pouco discutida academicamente. Para análise deste fenômeno, este trabalho inicia pelo exame da natureza jurídica da colaboração premiada, bem como pelas etapas de seu procedimento. Busca-se, pela análise da lavagem de provas a partir da necessidade de preservação da cadeia de custódia de provas, identificar as consequências jurídicas deste fenômeno. A partir da experiência do programa de leniência do CADE, são propostas possíveis medidas para o controle do abuso processual pela acusação. Conclui-se que a instituição de uma central única para colaborações premiadas, com o fim de melhor gerir a prova advinda de acordos desta natureza, aliada à difusão de boas práticas na negociação de acordos, pode trazer maior segurança jurídica aos pretensos colaboradores, de modo a evitar a lavagem de provas.2021text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8148615(Revista) ISSN 2525-510XRevista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, Vol. 7, Nº. 3, 2021, pags. 2203-2243porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|