Aspectos Conceptuales, Metodológicos y Normativos de la Ponderación

This essay is a dialectical and thorough different aspects criticized by constitutional indoctrinators about weighting models constitutional analysis. Positions conceptual, methodological and policy be revised, in order to dispel the main questions that arise when applying this model in a difficult...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carrillo de la Rosa, Yezid, Reyes Carrillo, Lisseth Johanna
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Weighting
rationalism
proportionality
axiology
collision
Ponderación
racionalismo
proporcionalidad
axiología
colisión
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7003931
Source:Revista Jurídica Mario Alario D'Filippo, ISSN 2256-2796, Vol. 5, Nº. 9, 2013, pags. 147-158
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Aspectos Conceptuales, Metodológicos y Normativos de la Ponderación
Summary: This essay is a dialectical and thorough different aspects criticized by constitutional indoctrinators about weighting models constitutional analysis. Positions conceptual, methodological and policy be revised, in order to dispel the main questions that arise when applying this model in a difficult case, and especially appreciate the logistical complexity of colliding principles to solve a particular case with a specific context, unlike similar from another environment. Another aspect to consider from an overall perspective throughout the trial, rationality is existing around the method employed by the constitutional court with weighting

Similar Items