La acción de amparo en Uruguay. Complemento de investigación
The purpose of this publication is to adjunct a research, already published on Revista de Derecho n. 16 (July-December, 2017). In said research, it was made apparent that the vast majority of petitions for writs of mandamus were denied by the courts. This follow-up research aims to verify if said te...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8136172 |
| Source: | Revista de Derecho: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Católica de Uruguay, ISSN 1510-3714, Nº. 22 (Julio-diciembre), 2020, pags. 160-177 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001490721
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista de Derecho: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Católica de Uruguay, ISSN 1510-3714, Nº. 22 (Julio-diciembre), 2020, pags. 160-177
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
writ of mandamus
human rights State constitutional law Constitution Law 16 011 protection of human rights acción de amparo derechos humanos Estado derecho constitucional Constitución Ley 16 011 garantía de los derechos humanos |
| spellingShingle |
writ of mandamus
human rights State constitutional law Constitution Law 16 011 protection of human rights acción de amparo derechos humanos Estado derecho constitucional Constitución Ley 16 011 garantía de los derechos humanos Risso Ferrand, Martín Garat, María Paula Rainaldi, Stefanía Pintos, Emanuel Kazarez, Melanie Guerra, Martín La acción de amparo en Uruguay. Complemento de investigación |
| description |
The purpose of this publication is to adjunct a research, already published on Revista de Derecho n. 16 (July-December, 2017). In said research, it was made apparent that the vast majority of petitions for writs of mandamus were denied by the courts. This follow-up research aims to verify if said tendency remained unaltered and methodize the reasons given by the judges to deny the petitions, in order to, in the end, propose an amending act which intends to allow the writ of mandamus to achieve its intended purpose, that is, to be a remedy for cases where human rights are violated. So as to achieve that, all final decisions from a Civil Court of Appeals regarding a writ of mandamus petition between October 2018th and September 2019th were collected. Then, all decisions regarding “medical writs of mandamus” were discarded, as well as all petitions not aimed against the State. The decisions that were left, were then divided by its result and, finally, each was scrutinized on the reasons given by the court for its judgement. In total, three hundred and sixty decisions were issued, of which only twenty-two were “not medical writ of mandamus”. Twenty of them were rejected based on a strict interpretation of the requirements of the law N° 16.011, with no regards of the constitutional principles on the matter nor the hermeneutical rules in cases involving human rights.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Risso Ferrand, Martín
Garat, María Paula Rainaldi, Stefanía Pintos, Emanuel Kazarez, Melanie Guerra, Martín |
| author_facet |
Risso Ferrand, Martín
Garat, María Paula Rainaldi, Stefanía Pintos, Emanuel Kazarez, Melanie Guerra, Martín |
| author_sort |
Risso Ferrand, Martín
|
| title |
La acción de amparo en Uruguay. Complemento de investigación
|
| title_short |
La acción de amparo en Uruguay. Complemento de investigación
|
| title_full |
La acción de amparo en Uruguay. Complemento de investigación
|
| title_fullStr |
La acción de amparo en Uruguay. Complemento de investigación
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
La acción de amparo en Uruguay. Complemento de investigación
|
| title_sort |
la acción de amparo en uruguay. complemento de investigación
|
| publishDate |
2020
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8136172
|
| _version_ |
1727491744837140480
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014907212022-03-15La acción de amparo en Uruguay. Complemento de investigaciónRisso Ferrand, MartínGarat, María PaulaRainaldi, StefaníaPintos, EmanuelKazarez, MelanieGuerra, Martínwrit of mandamushuman rightsStateconstitutional lawConstitutionLaw 16011protection of human rightsacción de amparoderechos humanosEstadoderecho constitucionalConstituciónLey 16011garantía de los derechos humanosThe purpose of this publication is to adjunct a research, already published on Revista de Derecho n. 16 (July-December, 2017). In said research, it was made apparent that the vast majority of petitions for writs of mandamus were denied by the courts. This follow-up research aims to verify if said tendency remained unaltered and methodize the reasons given by the judges to deny the petitions, in order to, in the end, propose an amending act which intends to allow the writ of mandamus to achieve its intended purpose, that is, to be a remedy for cases where human rights are violated. So as to achieve that, all final decisions from a Civil Court of Appeals regarding a writ of mandamus petition between October 2018th and September 2019th were collected. Then, all decisions regarding “medical writs of mandamus” were discarded, as well as all petitions not aimed against the State. The decisions that were left, were then divided by its result and, finally, each was scrutinized on the reasons given by the court for its judgement. In total, three hundred and sixty decisions were issued, of which only twenty-two were “not medical writ of mandamus”. Twenty of them were rejected based on a strict interpretation of the requirements of the law N° 16.011, with no regards of the constitutional principles on the matter nor the hermeneutical rules in cases involving human rights.El propósito de esta publicación es complementar una investigación publicada en Revista de Derecho n.º 16 (julio-diciembre, 2017), en la cual se constató que la inmensa mayoría de acciones de amparo en las que no se reclama asistencia médica eran rechazadas por los tribunales. Se pretendió verificar si la tendencia permanecía incambiada, así como sistematizar las razones esgrimidas por los jueces para desestimar los amparos y, en definitiva, proponer modificaciones legislativas que le permitieran a la acción de amparo observar su verdadera finalidad, que es ser la principal garantía para los derechos humanos lesionados. Para ello, se relevaron todas las sentencias definitivas dictadas en un proceso de amparo por los Tribunales de Apelaciones en lo Civil entre octubre de 2018 y setiembre de 2019 y se descartaron aquellas en las que el Estado no fuera parte demandada o se reclamase un medicamento o tratamiento médico. Luego se las dividió por resultado, para finalmente analizar los argumentos de cada una de ellas. En total, se dictaron trescientas sesenta sentencias, de las cuales solo veintidós correspondían a acciones de amparo “no médicos”, siendo en última instancia rechazados veinte de ellos en una aplicación errónea de los requisitos previstos en la ley 16.011, prescindiendo de los preceptos constitucionales y las pautas hermenéuticas en materia de derechos humanos.2020text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8136172(Revista) ISSN 1510-3714Revista de Derecho: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Católica de Uruguay, ISSN 1510-3714, Nº. 22 (Julio-diciembre), 2020, pags. 160-177spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|