Juízes pragmáticos são necessariamente juízes ativistas?
This paper discusses the relationship between the often distorted concepts of legal pragmatism, instrumentalism and judicial activism, in order to present and clarify some caricatures ordinarily made of them. After presenting different meanings of the expressions that can generate approximations or...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8131429 |
| Source: | Revista Brasileira de Direito, ISSN 2238-0604, Vol. 17, Nº. 1, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: RBD. Jan-Abr/2021; e4456) |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001490194
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014901942022-11-01Juízes pragmáticos são necessariamente juízes ativistas?Leal, FernandoLegal pragmatismJudicial activismInstrumentalismConsequentialismpragmatismo jurídicoativismo judicialinstrumentalismoconsequencialismoThis paper discusses the relationship between the often distorted concepts of legal pragmatism, instrumentalism and judicial activism, in order to present and clarify some caricatures ordinarily made of them. After presenting different meanings of the expressions that can generate approximations or distances between them, this paper explores the possible pragmatic justification for judicial self-restraint postures to justify the absence of necessary connections between pragmatism and judicial activism – even though possible associations between the two cannot be ignored when judges declare themselves pragmatic.O presente artigo discute a relação entre os conceitos muitas vezes distorcidos de pragmatismo jurídico, instrumentalismo e ativismo judicial, com o objetivo de apresentar e esclarecer algumas caricaturas geralmente a eles associadas. Após a apresentação de sentidos das expressões que podem gerar aproximações e distanciamentos entre elas, recorre-se à possibilidade de justificação pragmática de posturas de autocontenção judicial para sustentar a inexistência de associação necessária entre pragmatismo e ativismo judicial – ainda que possíveis relações entre ambos não possam ser ignoradas quando juízes se declaram pragmáticos.2021text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8131429(Revista) ISSN 2238-0604Revista Brasileira de Direito, ISSN 2238-0604, Vol. 17, Nº. 1, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: RBD. Jan-Abr/2021; e4456)porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Brasileira de Direito, ISSN 2238-0604, Vol. 17, Nº. 1, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: RBD. Jan-Abr/2021; e4456)
|
| language |
Portuguese
|
| topic |
Legal pragmatism
Judicial activism Instrumentalism Consequentialism pragmatismo jurídico ativismo judicial instrumentalismo consequencialismo |
| spellingShingle |
Legal pragmatism
Judicial activism Instrumentalism Consequentialism pragmatismo jurídico ativismo judicial instrumentalismo consequencialismo Leal, Fernando Juízes pragmáticos são necessariamente juízes ativistas? |
| description |
This paper discusses the relationship between the often distorted concepts of legal pragmatism, instrumentalism and judicial activism, in order to present and clarify some caricatures ordinarily made of them. After presenting different meanings of the expressions that can generate approximations or distances between them, this paper explores the possible pragmatic justification for judicial self-restraint postures to justify the absence of necessary connections between pragmatism and judicial activism – even though possible associations between the two cannot be ignored when judges declare themselves pragmatic.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Leal, Fernando
|
| author_facet |
Leal, Fernando
|
| author_sort |
Leal, Fernando
|
| title |
Juízes pragmáticos são necessariamente juízes ativistas?
|
| title_short |
Juízes pragmáticos são necessariamente juízes ativistas?
|
| title_full |
Juízes pragmáticos são necessariamente juízes ativistas?
|
| title_fullStr |
Juízes pragmáticos são necessariamente juízes ativistas?
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Juízes pragmáticos são necessariamente juízes ativistas?
|
| title_sort |
juízes pragmáticos são necessariamente juízes ativistas?
|
| publishDate |
2021
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8131429
|
| _version_ |
1748573212689563648
|