A superação das decisões do STF pelo Congresso Nacional via emendas constitucionais: Diálogo forçado ou monólogos sobrepostos?
The Brazilian system of judicial review confers broad powers to the Federal Supreme Court regarding the definition of the meaning of the Constitution. As a reaction to this strong model of control, the National Congress has adopted as a reaction strategy the approval of constitutional amendments as...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8073459 |
| Source: | Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, ISSN 2359-5639, Vol. 8, Nº. 1, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: janeiro/abril), pags. 209-236 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001477271
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, ISSN 2359-5639, Vol. 8, Nº. 1, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: janeiro/abril), pags. 209-236
|
| language |
Portuguese
|
| topic |
diálogos constitucionais
supremacia judicial controle jurisdicional de constitucionalidade democracia emendas constitucionais Onstitutional dialogues Judicial supremacy Judicial review Democracy Constitutional amendments |
| spellingShingle |
diálogos constitucionais
supremacia judicial controle jurisdicional de constitucionalidade democracia emendas constitucionais Onstitutional dialogues Judicial supremacy Judicial review Democracy Constitutional amendments Hachem, Daniel Wunder Pethechust, Eloi A superação das decisões do STF pelo Congresso Nacional via emendas constitucionais: Diálogo forçado ou monólogos sobrepostos? |
| description |
The Brazilian system of judicial review confers broad powers to the Federal Supreme Court regarding the definition of the meaning of the Constitution. As a reaction to this strong model of control, the National Congress has adopted as a reaction strategy the approval of constitutional amendments as a way of overriding judicial decisions that strike down legislation. The article aims to examine this phenomenon based on the theory of constitutional dialogues developed in Canadian law, using as theoretical framework the ideas of Peter Hogg and Allison Bushell, Kent Roach and Luc Tremblay, to verify if it is possible to consider this interaction between Legislative and Judiciary as an authentic constitutional dialogue. The method used was the bibliographical review, the case study, the analysis of jurisprudence and the manifestations of the parliamentarians in the National Congress. The study concludes that in all the five cases analyzed there was no effective dialogue, but rather an overlap of monologues among the actors involved, since the reasons of the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court in general are not taken into account by the National Congress.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Hachem, Daniel Wunder
Pethechust, Eloi |
| author_facet |
Hachem, Daniel Wunder
Pethechust, Eloi |
| author_sort |
Hachem, Daniel Wunder
|
| title |
A superação das decisões do STF pelo Congresso Nacional via emendas constitucionais: Diálogo forçado ou monólogos sobrepostos?
|
| title_short |
A superação das decisões do STF pelo Congresso Nacional via emendas constitucionais: Diálogo forçado ou monólogos sobrepostos?
|
| title_full |
A superação das decisões do STF pelo Congresso Nacional via emendas constitucionais: Diálogo forçado ou monólogos sobrepostos?
|
| title_fullStr |
A superação das decisões do STF pelo Congresso Nacional via emendas constitucionais: Diálogo forçado ou monólogos sobrepostos?
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
A superação das decisões do STF pelo Congresso Nacional via emendas constitucionais: Diálogo forçado ou monólogos sobrepostos?
|
| title_sort |
superação das decisões do stf pelo congresso nacional via emendas constitucionais: diálogo forçado ou monólogos sobrepostos?
|
| publishDate |
2021
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8073459
|
| _version_ |
1712909423503998976
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014772712021-10-05A superação das decisões do STF pelo Congresso Nacional via emendas constitucionais: Diálogo forçado ou monólogos sobrepostos?Hachem, Daniel WunderPethechust, Eloidiálogos constitucionaissupremacia judicialcontrole jurisdicional de constitucionalidadedemocraciaemendas constitucionaisOnstitutional dialoguesJudicial supremacyJudicial reviewDemocracyConstitutional amendmentsThe Brazilian system of judicial review confers broad powers to the Federal Supreme Court regarding the definition of the meaning of the Constitution. As a reaction to this strong model of control, the National Congress has adopted as a reaction strategy the approval of constitutional amendments as a way of overriding judicial decisions that strike down legislation. The article aims to examine this phenomenon based on the theory of constitutional dialogues developed in Canadian law, using as theoretical framework the ideas of Peter Hogg and Allison Bushell, Kent Roach and Luc Tremblay, to verify if it is possible to consider this interaction between Legislative and Judiciary as an authentic constitutional dialogue. The method used was the bibliographical review, the case study, the analysis of jurisprudence and the manifestations of the parliamentarians in the National Congress. The study concludes that in all the five cases analyzed there was no effective dialogue, but rather an overlap of monologues among the actors involved, since the reasons of the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court in general are not taken into account by the National Congress.O sistema brasileiro de controle jurisdicional de constitucionalidade confere amplos poderes ao Supremo Tribunal Federal em matéria de definição do sentido da Constituição. Como reação a esse modelo forte de controle, o Congresso Nacional tem adotado como estratégia de reação a aprovação de emendas constitucionais como forma de superação das decisões judicial declaratórias de inconstitucionalidade. O artigo tem como objetivo examinar esse fenômeno tomando como base a teoria dos diálogos constitucionais desenvolvida no Direito canadense, utilizando como marco teórico as ideias de Peter Hogg e Allison Bushell, Kent Roach e Luc Tremblay, para verificar se é possível considerar essa interação entre Legislativo e Judiciário como um autêntico diálogo constitucional. O método utilizado foi a revisão bibliográfica, o estudo de casos e a análise de jurisprudência e das manifestações dos parlamentares no Congresso Nacional. O estudo conclui que em todos os cinco casos analisados não houve efetivo diálogo, mas sim uma sobreposição de monólogos entre os atores envolvidos, uma vez que as razões do Supremo Tribunal Federal em geral não são levadas em consideração pelo Congresso Nacional.2021text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8073459(Revista) ISSN 2359-5639Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, ISSN 2359-5639, Vol. 8, Nº. 1, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: janeiro/abril), pags. 209-236porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|