Insuficiencias del paradigma punitivo y beneficios de la justicia restaurativa, a propósito de la doctrina Parot y la Vía Nanclares
Through the analysis of the three judgments that focused the legal-political debate regarding the suitability of the Parot doctrine (STS 197/2006, of March 28; STC 57/2008, of April 28 and STEDH Asunto Del Río Prada v. Spain, dated October 21, 2013) and the exposition of the restorative justice mode...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8065897 |
| Source: | Nuevo Foro Penal, ISSN 0120-8179, null 17, Nº. 96, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Nuevo Foro Penal), pags. 127-160 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
Through the analysis of the three judgments that focused the legal-political debate regarding the suitability of the Parot doctrine (STS 197/2006, of March 28; STC 57/2008, of April 28 and STEDH Asunto Del Río Prada v. Spain, dated October 21, 2013) and the exposition of the restorative justice model adopted in the Nanclares Meetings, this work exposes some of the deficiencies and dysfunctions of the punitive penal model and how the restorative paradigm is important benefits and advantages not only for the victims of the criminal act but for society as a whole. |
|---|