La Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional 35/2020, en el caso "Strawberry", un paso más, aunque no el definitivo, hacia la desaparición del delito de enaltecimiento del terrorismo
The legislative configuration of the crime of glorification of terrorism of article 578 of the Penal Code and of its judicial application, seem to be contrary to several doctrines firmly coined by the Spanish Constitutional Court and by the European Court of Human Rights in many cases. These include...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8044165 |
Source: | Revista española de derecho constitucional, ISSN 0211-5743, Año nº 41, Nº 122, 2021, pags. 367-388 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
Summary: |
The legislative configuration of the crime of glorification of terrorism of article 578 of the Penal Code and of its judicial application, seem to be contrary to several doctrines firmly coined by the Spanish Constitutional Court and by the European Court of Human Rights in many cases. These include the doctrine of chelling effect and that of the real danger. This is a study of said doctrines based on the recent and important Judgment of the Spanish Constitutional Court 35/2020, in the Strawberry case. |
---|