El derecho de huelga en la era digital: el esquirolaje tecnológico

It is said that the technology and the digitalisation are changing the labour relation ´s framework. The fundamental principle of the right to strike, unique because although it is enshrined in the Constitution, its legal development is slight, has also been affected by these transformations. Due to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sánchez-Girón Martínez, Beatriz
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7992301
Source:Estudios de Deusto: revista de la Universidad de Deusto, ISSN 0423-4847, Vol. 69, Nº. 1, 2021, pags. 39-47
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001465939
record_format
dialnet
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Estudios de Deusto: revista de la Universidad de Deusto, ISSN 0423-4847, Vol. 69, Nº. 1, 2021, pags. 39-47
language
Spanish
topic
strike
strike-breaking
business power
fundamental right
huelga
esquirolaje tecnológico
poder empresarial
derecho fundamental
spellingShingle
strike
strike-breaking
business power
fundamental right
huelga
esquirolaje tecnológico
poder empresarial
derecho fundamental
Sánchez-Girón Martínez, Beatriz
El derecho de huelga en la era digital: el esquirolaje tecnológico
description
It is said that the technology and the digitalisation are changing the labour relation ´s framework. The fundamental principle of the right to strike, unique because although it is enshrined in the Constitution, its legal development is slight, has also been affected by these transformations. Due to the new tools, employers could have a higher control of the production and of the workers. In this context, to guarantee the recognition and effective exercise of the fundamental rights is an essential requirement, but complex as well. Strike-breaking using technology is an example of this: generally speaking, traditional strike-breaking has been banned, however technological strike-breaking could be more easily justified because it is nof affecting workers. The case law shows how the Courts have weight the enjoyment of the fundamental right and the business powers in order to ascertain if the strikes are proportional. The power of the employer has grown, especially in the control of strikes, which means that a modern legislative effort is required to continue protecting the right to strike. Received: 04.02.2021Accepted: 18.06.2021
format
Article
author
Sánchez-Girón Martínez, Beatriz
author_facet
Sánchez-Girón Martínez, Beatriz
author_sort
Sánchez-Girón Martínez, Beatriz
title
El derecho de huelga en la era digital: el esquirolaje tecnológico
title_short
El derecho de huelga en la era digital: el esquirolaje tecnológico
title_full
El derecho de huelga en la era digital: el esquirolaje tecnológico
title_fullStr
El derecho de huelga en la era digital: el esquirolaje tecnológico
title_full_unstemmed
El derecho de huelga en la era digital: el esquirolaje tecnológico
title_sort
el derecho de huelga en la era digital: el esquirolaje tecnológico
publishDate
2021
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7992301
_version_
1709754932145422336
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014659392021-07-15El derecho de huelga en la era digital: el esquirolaje tecnológicoSánchez-Girón Martínez, Beatrizstrikestrike-breakingbusiness powerfundamental righthuelgaesquirolaje tecnológicopoder empresarialderecho fundamentalIt is said that the technology and the digitalisation are changing the labour relation ´s framework. The fundamental principle of the right to strike, unique because although it is enshrined in the Constitution, its legal development is slight, has also been affected by these transformations. Due to the new tools, employers could have a higher control of the production and of the workers. In this context, to guarantee the recognition and effective exercise of the fundamental rights is an essential requirement, but complex as well. Strike-breaking using technology is an example of this: generally speaking, traditional strike-breaking has been banned, however technological strike-breaking could be more easily justified because it is nof affecting workers. The case law shows how the Courts have weight the enjoyment of the fundamental right and the business powers in order to ascertain if the strikes are proportional. The power of the employer has grown, especially in the control of strikes, which means that a modern legislative effort is required to continue protecting the right to strike. Received: 04.02.2021Accepted: 18.06.2021Es de aceptación generalizada que las nuevas tecnologías y la digitalización están cambiando el marco de las relaciones laborales. El derecho fundamental de huelga, un derecho peculiar en cuanto a su reconocimiento constitucional y su escasa regulación, también se ha visto afectado por estos cambios. Las nuevas herramientas proveen al empresario de una mayor cantidad de instrumentos para controlar la organización empresarial y al propio trabajador. En este contexto garantizar el reconocimiento y ejercicio de los derechos fundamentales se hace imprescindible a la vez que complicado. Prueba de ello es el caso del esquirolaje tecnológico: si bien el esquirolaje tradicional ha sido prohibido en la medida en que atenta contra el fin de la huelga, el esquirolaje tecnológico encuentra justificación por no estar referido a trabajadores, si no a elementos tecnológicos. Atendiendo a casos concretos, los tribunales han dado respuestas a los problemas que origina el esquirolaje tecnológico apoyándose en una ponderación entre el ejercicio de un derecho fundamental y el poder organizativo empresarial. El poder del empresario ha crecido frente a las huelgas, lo que hace que se requiera un esfuerzo legislativo moderno para seguir protegiendo el derecho de huelga. Recibido: 04.02.2021Aceptado: 18.06.20212021text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7992301(Revista) ISSN 0423-4847Estudios de Deusto: revista de la Universidad de Deusto, ISSN 0423-4847, Vol. 69, Nº. 1, 2021, pags. 39-47spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI