Deliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial Review
Roberto Gargarella has infused into constitutional theory a deliberative approach to constitutional review and rights adjudication. By this, he has enriched our understanding of deliberative democracy as a political system in which the judiciary can play a central role, especially through the ins...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7907489 |
| Source: | Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 49, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Mayo – Agosto), pags. 179-197 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001455092
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 49, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Mayo – Agosto), pags. 179-197
|
| language |
English
|
| topic |
Deliberative democracy
social rights justiciability adjudication Gargarella Democracia deliberativa derechos sociales justiciabilidad adjudicación Gargarella |
| spellingShingle |
Deliberative democracy
social rights justiciability adjudication Gargarella Democracia deliberativa derechos sociales justiciabilidad adjudicación Gargarella Valentini, Chiara Deliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial Review |
| description |
Roberto Gargarella has infused into constitutional theory a deliberative
approach to constitutional review and rights adjudication. By this, he has
enriched our understanding of deliberative democracy as a political system
in which the judiciary can play a central role, especially through the institution
of constitutional review. Furthermore, he has provided us with crucial
insights into the deliberative potential of this institution, shedding light on
the different ways in which it may serve to secure the essential conditions of
democratic deliberation. The article centers on this twofold, crucial contribution
of Gargarella – to constitutional theory and to deliberative democratic
theory – with a focus on the relationship between social rights and constitutional
review. First, it presents the main controversial issues raised by this
relationship, concerning both social rights justiciability and adjudication.
Second it highlights the resources provided by Gargarella to understand and
address both orders of issues, based on his account of deliberative democracy
and constitutional review. Third, the article addresses the resulting view of
the action of courts on social rights. In particular, it inquires into the idea of
a “third way” for judicial action, requiring to modulate judicial review so as
to mediate between judicial inertia and activism.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Valentini, Chiara
|
| author_facet |
Valentini, Chiara
|
| author_sort |
Valentini, Chiara
|
| title |
Deliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial Review
|
| title_short |
Deliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial Review
|
| title_full |
Deliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial Review
|
| title_fullStr |
Deliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial Review
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Deliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial Review
|
| title_sort |
deliberative democracy, social rights and the modulation of judicial review
|
| publishDate |
2021
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7907489
|
| _version_ |
1709754245745475584
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014550922021-05-15Deliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial ReviewValentini, ChiaraDeliberative democracysocial rightsjusticiabilityadjudicationGargarellaDemocracia deliberativaderechos socialesjusticiabilidadadjudicaciónGargarellaRoberto Gargarella has infused into constitutional theory a deliberative approach to constitutional review and rights adjudication. By this, he has enriched our understanding of deliberative democracy as a political system in which the judiciary can play a central role, especially through the institution of constitutional review. Furthermore, he has provided us with crucial insights into the deliberative potential of this institution, shedding light on the different ways in which it may serve to secure the essential conditions of democratic deliberation. The article centers on this twofold, crucial contribution of Gargarella – to constitutional theory and to deliberative democratic theory – with a focus on the relationship between social rights and constitutional review. First, it presents the main controversial issues raised by this relationship, concerning both social rights justiciability and adjudication. Second it highlights the resources provided by Gargarella to understand and address both orders of issues, based on his account of deliberative democracy and constitutional review. Third, the article addresses the resulting view of the action of courts on social rights. In particular, it inquires into the idea of a “third way” for judicial action, requiring to modulate judicial review so as to mediate between judicial inertia and activism.Roberto Gargarella ha incorporado a la teoría constitucional una visión deliberativa del control de constitucionalidad y de la garantía judicial de los derechos. De este modo, ha enriquecido nuestra comprensión de la democracia deliberativa como sistema político en el que la judicatura puede jugar un papel central, especialmente a través de la institución del control de constitucionalidad. Más aún, nos ha proporcionado hallazgos cruciales sobre el potencial deliberativo de esta institución, mostrando las diferentes maneras en las que puede servir para garantizar las condiciones esenciales de la deliberación democrática. El artículo se centra en esta importante doble contribución de Gargarella –a la teoría constitucional y a la teoría de la democracia deliberativa– con especial atención a la relación entre derechos sociales y control de constitucionalidad. Primero, presenta los principales temas controvertidos que plantea esta relación, tanto en lo que concierne a la justiciabilidad de los derechos sociales como a su adjudicación. Segundo, destaca los recursos que Gargarella proporciona para entender y abordar ambos asuntos, sobre la base de su comprensión de la democracia deliberativa y del control de constitucionalidad. Tercero, analiza la perspectiva sobre la acción de los tribunales en materia de derechos sociales que resulta de ello. En especial, explora la idea de una “tercera vía” de acción judicial, que exigiría modular el control de constitucionalidad para mediar entre la inercia y el activismo judicial.2021text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7907489(Revista) ISSN 0122-9893Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 49, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Mayo – Agosto), pags. 179-197engLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|