Las medidas antiproceso en el arbitraje peruano .
The Peruvian Arbitration Law was inspired by the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. Both rules empower arbitration tribunals to issue anti-process or anti-suit injunctions. These measures classified as precautionary measures aim to protect the jurisdictional monopoly g...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7882629 |
| Source: | THEMIS: Revista de Derecho, ISSN 1810-9934, Nº. 77, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Arbitraje), pags. 233-252 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001451064
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014510642021-04-29Las medidas antiproceso en el arbitraje peruano .Reggiardo Saavedra, MarioCuba Horna, ÁlvaroMedidas anti-procesocláusula arbitralmonopolio jurisdiccionaltribunal arbitral: procesos paralelostest de triple identidadAnti-suit injunctionsarbitral clausejurisdictional monopolyarbitration tribunal: parallel proceedingstriple identity testThe Peruvian Arbitration Law was inspired by the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. Both rules empower arbitration tribunals to issue anti-process or anti-suit injunctions. These measures classified as precautionary measures aim to protect the jurisdictional monopoly granted by the parties to the arbitral tribunal to address the risk of two parallel proceedings and two contradictory decisions being issued. However, despite appearing to be a useful remedy in arbitral material, it has certain questions that diminish its application. In this article, the authors analyze such measures to address the questioning that limit its application to verify their efficiency and validity. It also assesses its requirements under international arbitration practice to corroborate whether they conform to the Peruvian regulatory framework.La Ley de Arbitraje se inspiró en la Ley Modelo de Arbitraje Comercial Internacional de la CNUDMI. Ambas normas facultan a los tribunales arbitrales a dictar medidas anti-proceso o anti-suit injunctions. Estas medidas calificadas como medidas cautelares tienen como función la protección del monopolio jurisdiccional otorgado por las partes al tribunal arbitral para así, afrontar el riesgo de que existan dos procesos paralelos y se emitan dos decisiones contradictorias. Empero, a pesar de aparentar un remedio útil en material arbitral, posee ciertos cuestionamientos que disminuyen su aplicación. En el presente artículo, los autores analizan este tipo de medidas para dar respuesta a los distintos cuestionamientos que limitan su aplicación con la finalidad de comprobar su eficiencia y validez. Asimismo, evalúan sus requisitos bajo la práctica arbitral internacional para corroborar si se ajustan o no al marco normativo peruano.2020text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7882629(Revista) ISSN 1810-9934THEMIS: Revista de Derecho, ISSN 1810-9934, Nº. 77, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Arbitraje), pags. 233-252spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
THEMIS: Revista de Derecho, ISSN 1810-9934, Nº. 77, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Arbitraje), pags. 233-252
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Medidas anti-proceso
cláusula arbitral monopolio jurisdiccional tribunal arbitral: procesos paralelos test de triple identidad Anti-suit injunctions arbitral clause jurisdictional monopoly arbitration tribunal: parallel proceedings triple identity test |
| spellingShingle |
Medidas anti-proceso
cláusula arbitral monopolio jurisdiccional tribunal arbitral: procesos paralelos test de triple identidad Anti-suit injunctions arbitral clause jurisdictional monopoly arbitration tribunal: parallel proceedings triple identity test Reggiardo Saavedra, Mario Cuba Horna, Álvaro Las medidas antiproceso en el arbitraje peruano . |
| description |
The Peruvian Arbitration Law was inspired by
the UNCITRAL Model Law on International
Commercial Arbitration. Both rules empower
arbitration tribunals to issue anti-process or
anti-suit injunctions. These measures classified
as precautionary measures aim to protect the
jurisdictional monopoly granted by the parties
to the arbitral tribunal to address the risk of
two parallel proceedings and two contradictory
decisions being issued. However, despite appearing
to be a useful remedy in arbitral material, it has
certain questions that diminish its application.
In this article, the authors analyze such measures
to address the questioning that limit its application
to verify their efficiency and validity. It also assesses
its requirements under international arbitration
practice to corroborate whether they conform to
the Peruvian regulatory framework.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Reggiardo Saavedra, Mario
Cuba Horna, Álvaro |
| author_facet |
Reggiardo Saavedra, Mario
Cuba Horna, Álvaro |
| author_sort |
Reggiardo Saavedra, Mario
|
| title |
Las medidas antiproceso en el arbitraje peruano .
|
| title_short |
Las medidas antiproceso en el arbitraje peruano .
|
| title_full |
Las medidas antiproceso en el arbitraje peruano .
|
| title_fullStr |
Las medidas antiproceso en el arbitraje peruano .
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Las medidas antiproceso en el arbitraje peruano .
|
| title_sort |
las medidas antiproceso en el arbitraje peruano .
|
| publishDate |
2020
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7882629
|
| _version_ |
1709754273329315840
|