Las medidas antiproceso en el arbitraje peruano .
The Peruvian Arbitration Law was inspired by the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. Both rules empower arbitration tribunals to issue anti-process or anti-suit injunctions. These measures classified as precautionary measures aim to protect the jurisdictional monopoly g...
Gorde:
| Egile Nagusiak: | , |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Gaztelania |
| Argitaratua: |
2020
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7882629 |
| Baliabidea: | THEMIS: Revista de Derecho, ISSN 1810-9934, Nº. 77, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Arbitraje), pags. 233-252 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| Laburpena: |
The Peruvian Arbitration Law was inspired by
the UNCITRAL Model Law on International
Commercial Arbitration. Both rules empower
arbitration tribunals to issue anti-process or
anti-suit injunctions. These measures classified
as precautionary measures aim to protect the
jurisdictional monopoly granted by the parties
to the arbitral tribunal to address the risk of
two parallel proceedings and two contradictory
decisions being issued. However, despite appearing
to be a useful remedy in arbitral material, it has
certain questions that diminish its application.
In this article, the authors analyze such measures
to address the questioning that limit its application
to verify their efficiency and validity. It also assesses
its requirements under international arbitration
practice to corroborate whether they conform to
the Peruvian regulatory framework. |
|---|