Contextualización histórica y normativa del delito político en el marco del conflicto armado colombiano
This document seeks to show that in the demobilization processes and agreements with armed groups raised in arms, the Colombian State has acted under a pattern of non compliance with what has been agreed throughout history and for this, a description of the historical context is made in each scenar...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7865339 |
Source: | Nuevo Foro Penal, ISSN 0120-8179, null 16, Nº. 95, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Nuevo Foro Penal), pags. 93-135 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
Summary: |
This document seeks to show that in the demobilization processes and agreements with armed groups raised in arms, the Colombian State has acted under a pattern of non compliance with what has been agreed throughout history and for this, a description of the historical context is made in each scenario, until reaching the Agreement signed between the National Government and the FARCEP in which the framework for the creation of the SIVJRNR was established.
The question that arises is why does the State also maintain in the Havana Agreement the pattern of noncompliance with the demobilization processes that preceded it? To conclude, that once the demobilized groups lay down their arms, the State no longer has to fight them, their obligations cease to be binding and as a consequence of this, the State fulfills its purpose of continuing the war “... to bring down the adversary and incapacitate him so that he cannot continue with his resistance ”. “... Imposing our will on the enemy is the goal.spa |
---|