Maltrato animal en Colombia: Protección penal y contravencional en favor de los animales

Objectives: Look for points of intersection between criminal law and the infringement regime, clarifying the differences that exist and the objectives and purposes of each norm. Methodology: Through a documentary analysis, it investigates the main modifications introduced in each of the statutes, re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pérez Arias, Luz Marcela, Monsalve Mantilla, Milton Duban
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7812782
Source:DIXI, ISSN 0124-7255, null 22, Nº. 2 (julio-diciembre), 2020
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001440955
record_format
dialnet
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
DIXI, ISSN 0124-7255, null 22, Nº. 2 (julio-diciembre), 2020
language
Spanish
topic
anthropocentrism
animal abuse
police measures
animal protection
antropocentrismo
maltrato animal
medidas policivas
protección animal
antropocentrismo
abuso animal
medidas policiais
proteção animal
spellingShingle
anthropocentrism
animal abuse
police measures
animal protection
antropocentrismo
maltrato animal
medidas policivas
protección animal
antropocentrismo
abuso animal
medidas policiais
proteção animal
Pérez Arias, Luz Marcela
Monsalve Mantilla, Milton Duban
Maltrato animal en Colombia: Protección penal y contravencional en favor de los animales
description
Objectives: Look for points of intersection between criminal law and the infringement regime, clarifying the differences that exist and the objectives and purposes of each norm. Methodology: Through a documentary analysis, it investigates the main modifications introduced in each of the statutes, reviewing the jurisprudence and going to the analysis of sources. Findings: In Colombia, when dealing with cases of “animal abuse”, there is an infringement regime of knowledge of the Police Inspections and Municipal Mayors, which is supported by Law 84 of 1989 and the National Police and Coexistence Code; in turn, the criminal procedure is in charge of municipal criminal judges in accordance with Law 1774 of 2016, which is why it is pertinent to study its various implications. Conclusions: Law 1774 of 2016 created a criminal instance and at the same time strengthened sanctions of the police or infringement law. Both Law 1774 of 2016 (Law of Animal Abuse), and Law 1801 of 2016 (or National Police and Coexistence Code) represent an advance for the protection, conservation and recognition of animals as “subjects of rights”, leaving behind the “objectifying” vision, typical of the Civil Code.
format
Article
author
Pérez Arias, Luz Marcela
Monsalve Mantilla, Milton Duban
author_facet
Pérez Arias, Luz Marcela
Monsalve Mantilla, Milton Duban
author_sort
Pérez Arias, Luz Marcela
title
Maltrato animal en Colombia: Protección penal y contravencional en favor de los animales
title_short
Maltrato animal en Colombia: Protección penal y contravencional en favor de los animales
title_full
Maltrato animal en Colombia: Protección penal y contravencional en favor de los animales
title_fullStr
Maltrato animal en Colombia: Protección penal y contravencional en favor de los animales
title_full_unstemmed
Maltrato animal en Colombia: Protección penal y contravencional en favor de los animales
title_sort
maltrato animal en colombia: protección penal y contravencional en favor de los animales
publishDate
2020
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7812782
_version_
1709754189994786816
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014409552021-03-16Maltrato animal en Colombia: Protección penal y contravencional en favor de los animalesPérez Arias, Luz MarcelaMonsalve Mantilla, Milton Dubananthropocentrismanimal abusepolice measuresanimal protectionantropocentrismomaltrato animalmedidas policivasprotección animalantropocentrismoabuso animalmedidas policiaisproteção animalObjectives: Look for points of intersection between criminal law and the infringement regime, clarifying the differences that exist and the objectives and purposes of each norm. Methodology: Through a documentary analysis, it investigates the main modifications introduced in each of the statutes, reviewing the jurisprudence and going to the analysis of sources. Findings: In Colombia, when dealing with cases of “animal abuse”, there is an infringement regime of knowledge of the Police Inspections and Municipal Mayors, which is supported by Law 84 of 1989 and the National Police and Coexistence Code; in turn, the criminal procedure is in charge of municipal criminal judges in accordance with Law 1774 of 2016, which is why it is pertinent to study its various implications. Conclusions: Law 1774 of 2016 created a criminal instance and at the same time strengthened sanctions of the police or infringement law. Both Law 1774 of 2016 (Law of Animal Abuse), and Law 1801 of 2016 (or National Police and Coexistence Code) represent an advance for the protection, conservation and recognition of animals as “subjects of rights”, leaving behind the “objectifying” vision, typical of the Civil Code.Objetivos: Buscar pontos de intersecção entre o direito penal e o regime de infração, esclarecendo as diferenças existentes e os objetivos e finalidades de cada norma. Metodologia: Através de uma análise documental, investiga as principais modificações introduzidas em cada um dos estatutos, revendo a jurisprudência e procedendo à análise das fontes. Constatações: Na Colômbia, quando se trata de casos de “maus-tratos a animais”, existe um regime de infração de conhecimento das Inspeções Policiais e Prefeitos Municipais, amparado pela Lei 84 de 1989 e pela Polícia Nacional e Código de Convivência; por sua vez, o processo penal está a cargo dos juízes criminais municipais de acordo com a Lei 1774 de 2016, razão pela qual é pertinente estudar suas diversas implicações. Conclusões: a Lei 1774 de 2016 criou uma instância criminal e ao mesmo tempo reforçou as sanções da polícia ou de infração. Tanto a Lei 1774 de 2016 (Lei do Abuso de Animais), quanto a Lei 1801 de 2016 (ou Código Nacional de Polícia e Convivência) representam um avanço para a proteção, conservação e reconhecimento dos animais como “sujeitos de direitos”, deixando para trás a “objetificação” visão, típica do Código Civil.Objetivo: buscar puntos de intersección entre el derecho penal y el régimen contravencional, clarificando las diferencias que existen y los objetivos y propósitos de cada norma. Metodología: a través de un análisis documental, se indaga por las principales modificaciones introducidas en cada uno de los estatutos, revisando la jurisprudencia y acudiendo al análisis de fuentes. Hallazgos: en Colombia, frente al abordaje de casos de “maltrato animal”, existe el régimen contravencional de conocimiento de las Inspecciones de Policía y las Alcaldías Municipales, el cual encuentra sustento en la Ley 84 de 1989 y en el Código Nacional de Policía y Convivencia; a su vez, se halla el régimen de la vía penal, a cargo de jueces penales municipales de conformidad con la Ley 1774 de 2016, es por ello que se hace pertinente estudiar sus diversas implicaciones. Conclusiones: la ley 1774 de 2016 creó una instancia penal y a la par fortaleció sanciones del derecho policivo o contravencional. Tanto la Ley 1774 de 2016 (Ley de Maltrato Animal), como la Ley 1801 de 2016 (o Código Nacional de Policía y Convivencia) representan un avance para la protección, la conservación y el reconocimiento de los animales como “sujetos de derechos”, dejando atrás la visión “cosificadora”, propia del Código Civil.2020text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7812782(Revista) ISSN 0124-7255DIXI, ISSN 0124-7255, null 22, Nº. 2 (julio-diciembre), 2020spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI