El ‘Antiprocesalismo’ en el Ordenamiento Jurídico Colombiano
Since the beginning of the 20th century the Colombian legal system has displayed a theory called ‘antiprocesalism’, according to which judges are not bound by their own decisions if they are so mistaken, so they can be considered as illegal. When this happens, judges can ignore those decisions. Ther...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7793077 |
| Source: | Derecho & Sociedad, ISSN 2079-3634, Nº. 52, 2019, pags. 255-274 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001438678
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014386782021-03-03El ‘Antiprocesalismo’ en el Ordenamiento Jurídico ColombianoBejarano Ricaurte, AnaAntiprocesalismo“el auto ilegal no ata”Sistema Judicialautojueznulidad procesalchoque de trenesCorte Constitucional colombianaCorte Suprema de Justicia de ColombiaConsejo de Estado de ColombiapreclusiónSince the beginning of the 20th century the Colombian legal system has displayed a theory called ‘antiprocesalism’, according to which judges are not bound by their own decisions if they are so mistaken, so they can be considered as illegal. When this happens, judges can ignore those decisions. There is currently no consensus regarding the practical application of this theory, whether the judge can automatically ignore its own decisions, or whether the mistake must be pointed out by the parties. There is also discussion regarding when can those decisions be ignored related to their enforceability and if this theory can be applied to any type of judicial decision. This uncertainty has produced the irregular application of this theory, sometimes even damaging the right to due process, specially coming from lowercircuit judges. Still, current and past decisions from the nation’s highest courts present some viable criteria for the safe and uniform application of this theory in legal practice. Those criteria are studied and presented in this essay.Desde inicios del siglo XX ha existido en el ordenamiento jurídico colombiano una teoría llamada “antiprocesalismo” según la cual el auto ilegal no puede atar el juez y, por tanto, dicha circunstancia le permite desconocer la providencia o revocarla. Actualmente no hay consenso sobre la forma en que debe aplicarse dicha teoría, si el juez puede desconocer las providencias erradas de oficio, por fuera del término de ejecutoria o cuando tengan carácter de sentencia. Sobre estos asuntos difiere la jurisprudencia de las altas cortes, incurriendo en lo que en la práctica jurídica se conoce como “Choque de Trenes”. Esta incertidumbre ha conducido a la aplicación irregular -y en ocasiones vulnerando el derecho al debido procesode esta teoría por los jueces de instancia. En todo caso, los pronunciamientos disponibles permiten vislumbrar algunos criterios, que se ofrecen en este ensayo, para que la práctica jurídica haga una aplicación uniforme de la misma.2019text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7793077(Revista) ISSN 2079-3634Derecho & Sociedad, ISSN 2079-3634, Nº. 52, 2019, pags. 255-274spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Derecho & Sociedad, ISSN 2079-3634, Nº. 52, 2019, pags. 255-274
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Antiprocesalismo
“el auto ilegal no ata” Sistema Judicial auto juez nulidad procesal choque de trenes Corte Constitucional colombiana Corte Suprema de Justicia de Colombia Consejo de Estado de Colombia preclusión |
| spellingShingle |
Antiprocesalismo
“el auto ilegal no ata” Sistema Judicial auto juez nulidad procesal choque de trenes Corte Constitucional colombiana Corte Suprema de Justicia de Colombia Consejo de Estado de Colombia preclusión Bejarano Ricaurte, Ana El ‘Antiprocesalismo’ en el Ordenamiento Jurídico Colombiano |
| description |
Since the beginning of the 20th century the Colombian legal system has displayed a theory called ‘antiprocesalism’, according to which judges are not bound by their own decisions if they are so mistaken, so they can be considered as illegal. When this happens, judges can ignore those decisions. There is currently no consensus regarding the practical application of this theory, whether the judge can automatically ignore its own decisions, or whether the mistake must be pointed out by the parties. There is also discussion regarding when can those decisions be ignored related to their enforceability and if this theory can be applied to any type of judicial decision. This uncertainty has produced the irregular application of this theory, sometimes even damaging the right to due process, specially coming from lowercircuit judges. Still, current and past decisions from the nation’s highest courts present some viable criteria for the safe and uniform application of this theory in legal practice. Those criteria are studied and presented in this essay.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Bejarano Ricaurte, Ana
|
| author_facet |
Bejarano Ricaurte, Ana
|
| author_sort |
Bejarano Ricaurte, Ana
|
| title |
El ‘Antiprocesalismo’ en el Ordenamiento Jurídico Colombiano
|
| title_short |
El ‘Antiprocesalismo’ en el Ordenamiento Jurídico Colombiano
|
| title_full |
El ‘Antiprocesalismo’ en el Ordenamiento Jurídico Colombiano
|
| title_fullStr |
El ‘Antiprocesalismo’ en el Ordenamiento Jurídico Colombiano
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
El ‘Antiprocesalismo’ en el Ordenamiento Jurídico Colombiano
|
| title_sort |
el ‘antiprocesalismo’ en el ordenamiento jurídico colombiano
|
| publishDate |
2019
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7793077
|
| _version_ |
1709753673320497152
|