Redefinindo o trânsito em julgado a partir da soberania dos veredictos: a coisa julgada parcial no tribunal do júri

Jury trials have presented themselves in history as an important instrument for the consolidation of democratic processes, because they are a tribunal for which the people are summoned to discuss and directly judge facts that have occurred in their community. With the intention of strengthening the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rodrigues, Paulo Gustavo
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7731772
Source:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, Vol. 6, Nº. 2 (Maio-Agosto), 2020, pags. 873-910
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001431423
record_format
dialnet
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014314232021-01-30Redefinindo o trânsito em julgado a partir da soberania dos veredictos: a coisa julgada parcial no tribunal do júriRodrigues, Paulo GustavoVerdict sovereigntyTrial by a JuryEnforcement of sentenceRes JudicataSoberania dos vereditosTribunal do JúriCumprimento da PenaCoisa JulgadaJury trials have presented themselves in history as an important instrument for the consolidation of democratic processes, because they are a tribunal for which the people are summoned to discuss and directly judge facts that have occurred in their community. With the intention of strengthening the institution after a dictatorial period, the Brazilian Constituent Assembly rescued the sovereignty of the verdicts, and raised the institution and its characteristics to the level of a fundamental clause. From an exploratory perspective, of qualitative nature, the present work intends to investigate how the sovereignty of the verdicts impacts on the legal procedure of the intentional crimes against the life to the point of redefining the initial moment of compliance to the sentence, possibly justifying hypotheses of execution of the sentence in the first, second degree or after the end of the process. It will be discussed the possibility of forming a partial claim preclusion in relation to the criminal responsibility of the defendant, in face of the subjectively complex nature of the condemnatory sentence of the Jury procedure. O Tribunal do Júri se apresentou na história como importante instrumento de consolidação de processos democráticos, por se mostrar uma tribuna à qual o povo é convocado para discutir e julgar diretamente fatos ocorridos em sua comunidade. Com a intenção de fortalecer a instituição após um período ditatorial, o constituinte brasileiro resgatou a soberania dos veredictos e ergueu a instituição e suas características ao patamar de cláusula pétrea fundamental. A partir de uma proposta exploratória, de análise qualitativa, o presente trabalho pretende investigar de que forma a soberania dos vereditos impacta no procedimento legal dos crimes dolosos contra a vida a ponto de redefinir o momento inicial de cumprimento da pena, eventualmente justificando hipóteses de execução da pena na primeira, na segunda instância ou após o término definitivo do processo. Discutir-se-á a possibilidade de formação de coisa julgada parcial em relação à culpa do réu ante a natureza subjetivamente complexa da sentença condenatória do procedimento do júri. 2020text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7731772(Revista) ISSN 2525-510XRevista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, Vol. 6, Nº. 2 (Maio-Agosto), 2020, pags. 873-910porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, Vol. 6, Nº. 2 (Maio-Agosto), 2020, pags. 873-910
language
Portuguese
topic
Verdict sovereignty
Trial by a Jury
Enforcement of sentence
Res Judicata
Soberania dos vereditos
Tribunal do Júri
Cumprimento da Pena
Coisa Julgada
spellingShingle
Verdict sovereignty
Trial by a Jury
Enforcement of sentence
Res Judicata
Soberania dos vereditos
Tribunal do Júri
Cumprimento da Pena
Coisa Julgada
Rodrigues, Paulo Gustavo
Redefinindo o trânsito em julgado a partir da soberania dos veredictos: a coisa julgada parcial no tribunal do júri
description
Jury trials have presented themselves in history as an important instrument for the consolidation of democratic processes, because they are a tribunal for which the people are summoned to discuss and directly judge facts that have occurred in their community. With the intention of strengthening the institution after a dictatorial period, the Brazilian Constituent Assembly rescued the sovereignty of the verdicts, and raised the institution and its characteristics to the level of a fundamental clause. From an exploratory perspective, of qualitative nature, the present work intends to investigate how the sovereignty of the verdicts impacts on the legal procedure of the intentional crimes against the life to the point of redefining the initial moment of compliance to the sentence, possibly justifying hypotheses of execution of the sentence in the first, second degree or after the end of the process. It will be discussed the possibility of forming a partial claim preclusion in relation to the criminal responsibility of the defendant, in face of the subjectively complex nature of the condemnatory sentence of the Jury procedure. 
format
Article
author
Rodrigues, Paulo Gustavo
author_facet
Rodrigues, Paulo Gustavo
author_sort
Rodrigues, Paulo Gustavo
title
Redefinindo o trânsito em julgado a partir da soberania dos veredictos: a coisa julgada parcial no tribunal do júri
title_short
Redefinindo o trânsito em julgado a partir da soberania dos veredictos: a coisa julgada parcial no tribunal do júri
title_full
Redefinindo o trânsito em julgado a partir da soberania dos veredictos: a coisa julgada parcial no tribunal do júri
title_fullStr
Redefinindo o trânsito em julgado a partir da soberania dos veredictos: a coisa julgada parcial no tribunal do júri
title_full_unstemmed
Redefinindo o trânsito em julgado a partir da soberania dos veredictos: a coisa julgada parcial no tribunal do júri
title_sort
redefinindo o trânsito em julgado a partir da soberania dos veredictos: a coisa julgada parcial no tribunal do júri
publishDate
2020
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7731772
_version_
1709753380125016064