A introdução do juiz das garantias no Brasil e o inquérito policial eletrônico

A “judge of guarantees” is a magistrate who acts only in the investigation phase, assessing the legality of the acts and deciding personal and real precautionary measures. Its adoption seeks to avoid psychological contamination of the magistrate, who will judge an eventual process. Introduced in Bra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chemim Guimarães, Rodrigo Régnier, Ribeiro, Sarah Gonçalves
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7731763
Source:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, Vol. 6, Nº. 1 (Janeiro-Abril), 2020, pags. 147-174
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001431414
record_format
dialnet
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, Vol. 6, Nº. 1 (Janeiro-Abril), 2020, pags. 147-174
language
Portuguese
topic
police investigation
judge of guarantees
police inquiry
electronic police inquiry
inquérito policial
investigação policial
juiz das garantias
inquérito policial eletrônico
spellingShingle
police investigation
judge of guarantees
police inquiry
electronic police inquiry
inquérito policial
investigação policial
juiz das garantias
inquérito policial eletrônico
Chemim Guimarães, Rodrigo Régnier
Ribeiro, Sarah Gonçalves
A introdução do juiz das garantias no Brasil e o inquérito policial eletrônico
description
A “judge of guarantees” is a magistrate who acts only in the investigation phase, assessing the legality of the acts and deciding personal and real precautionary measures. Its adoption seeks to avoid psychological contamination of the magistrate, who will judge an eventual process. Introduced in Brazil by Law 13.964/2019, it is being challenged in four direct actions of unconstitutionality. In a preliminary decision, minister Fux accepted the intention to suspend the rules included in the Code of Criminal Procedure, for an indefinite period. Among them, art. 3º-D, which proposes the creation of a system of rotation of magistrates in the counties where only one judge works, as a solution to make the presence of the “judge of guarantees” feasible in the interior of the country. The central argument for this decision was the undue interference of the Legislative Power in the budgetary autonomy and self-management of the Judiciary, added, both to the high cost of hiring new magistrates, prosecutors, police officers and public defenders, as well as the routine expenses with daily physical displacement of these professionals. This article aims to present the adoption of the electronic police inquiry as a mitigation for the costs of implantation of the “judge of guarantees” in Brazil, neutralizing the discussion of the constitutionality of art. 3rd-D in the Federal Supreme Court.
format
Article
author
Chemim Guimarães, Rodrigo Régnier
Ribeiro, Sarah Gonçalves
author_facet
Chemim Guimarães, Rodrigo Régnier
Ribeiro, Sarah Gonçalves
author_sort
Chemim Guimarães, Rodrigo Régnier
title
A introdução do juiz das garantias no Brasil e o inquérito policial eletrônico
title_short
A introdução do juiz das garantias no Brasil e o inquérito policial eletrônico
title_full
A introdução do juiz das garantias no Brasil e o inquérito policial eletrônico
title_fullStr
A introdução do juiz das garantias no Brasil e o inquérito policial eletrônico
title_full_unstemmed
A introdução do juiz das garantias no Brasil e o inquérito policial eletrônico
title_sort
introdução do juiz das garantias no brasil e o inquérito policial eletrônico
publishDate
2020
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7731763
_version_
1709753375846825984
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014314142021-01-30A introdução do juiz das garantias no Brasil e o inquérito policial eletrônicoChemim Guimarães, Rodrigo RégnierRibeiro, Sarah Gonçalvespolice investigationjudge of guaranteespolice inquiryelectronic police inquiryinquérito policialinvestigação policialjuiz das garantiasinquérito policial eletrônicoA “judge of guarantees” is a magistrate who acts only in the investigation phase, assessing the legality of the acts and deciding personal and real precautionary measures. Its adoption seeks to avoid psychological contamination of the magistrate, who will judge an eventual process. Introduced in Brazil by Law 13.964/2019, it is being challenged in four direct actions of unconstitutionality. In a preliminary decision, minister Fux accepted the intention to suspend the rules included in the Code of Criminal Procedure, for an indefinite period. Among them, art. 3º-D, which proposes the creation of a system of rotation of magistrates in the counties where only one judge works, as a solution to make the presence of the “judge of guarantees” feasible in the interior of the country. The central argument for this decision was the undue interference of the Legislative Power in the budgetary autonomy and self-management of the Judiciary, added, both to the high cost of hiring new magistrates, prosecutors, police officers and public defenders, as well as the routine expenses with daily physical displacement of these professionals. This article aims to present the adoption of the electronic police inquiry as a mitigation for the costs of implantation of the “judge of guarantees” in Brazil, neutralizing the discussion of the constitutionality of art. 3rd-D in the Federal Supreme Court.Considera-se “juiz das garantias” o magistrado que atua apenas na fase de investigação, avaliando a legalidade dos atos e decidindo medidas cautelares pessoais e reais. Sua adoção procura evitar a contaminação psicológica do magistrado que julgará eventual processo. Introduzido, no Brasil, pela Lei 13.964/2019, está sendo questionado em quatro ações diretas de inconstitucionalidade. Em decisão liminar, o ministro Fux acolheu a pretensão de suspensão das regras inseridas no Código de Processo Penal, por período indeterminado. Dentre elas, o art. 3º-D, que propõea criação de um sistema de rodízio de magistrados nas comarcas em que funcionar apenas um juiz, como solução para a viabilizar a presença do “juiz das garantias” no interior do país. O argumento central para essa decisão, foi a indevida ingerência do Poder Legislativo na autonomia orçamentária e de auto-gestão do Judiciário, somada, tanto ao elevado custo de contratação de novos magistrados, promotores, delegados e defensores públicos, quanto aos gastos rotineiros com diárias em deslocamentos físicos destes profissionais. O presente artigo visa a apresentar a adoção do inquérito policial eletrônico como atenuante para os custos de implantação do “juiz das garantias” no Brasil, neutralizando a discussão de constitucionalidade do art. 3º-D no Supremo Tribunal Federal. 2020text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7731763(Revista) ISSN 2525-510XRevista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, Vol. 6, Nº. 1 (Janeiro-Abril), 2020, pags. 147-174porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI