La producción de prueba de descargo por parte de la defensa en el proceso penal en Argentina durante la etapa de instrucción o investigación. Un análisis comparativo entre procesos inquisitivos y acusatorios
The following paper is based on the analysis of three different procedural systems, all of them which coexist in Argentina: the reformed inquisitorial (applicable at federal and national justice), the first (Provincia de Buenos Aires) and second generation adversarial (Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aire...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7731759 |
| Source: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, Vol. 6, Nº. 1 (Janeiro-Abril), 2020, pags. 329-360 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
The following paper is based on the analysis of three different procedural systems, all of them which coexist in Argentina: the reformed inquisitorial (applicable at federal and national justice), the first (Provincia de Buenos Aires) and second generation adversarial (Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires). In the incoming lines, I’ll intend to review the similarities and differences that exist in relation to the defendant’s right of introducing proof during the investigation stage of the process. In order to do this, I’ll try to look up how this constitutional right is regulated in each jurisdiction, for then finding out if there is any kind of legacy of the inquisitorial model in adversarial systems. |
|---|