Credibilidad testimonial del testigo en el proceso penal

dialnet-ar-18-ART0001431406

dialnet

dialnet-ar-18-ART00014314062021-01-30Credibilidad testimonial del testigo en el proceso penalAyala Yancce, RafaelMemorycredibilitytestimonyeyewitnessreferential witnessMemoriacredibilidadtestimoniotestigo presencialtestigo referencialNowadays, the great majority of the judges to assess the credibility of the testimonies within the criminal process as a first point analyze the personal characteristics and physiological changes of the witness, leaving aside the functionality of human memory. The psychology of the testimony tells us that in order to assess credibility, it is not necessary to examine the characteristics of the witness, but rather that the correspondence between what happened and what the witness manifests from what he has perceived must be analyzed, since this allows us to differentiate between the experiences lived from those imagined or invented stories. The objective of this article is to analyze the accuracy of the memory when reproducing the information. Once the accuracy of the report and the failures in the recovery of the information have been analyzed, I will focus on presenting the steps or criteria for assessing the testimonial credibility of the eyewitnesses and referential witnesses that the judge must take into account when motivating the judgment.Hoy en día la gran mayoría de los jueces para valorar la credibilidad testimonial dentro del proceso penal como primer punto analizan las características personales y los cambios fisiológicos del testigo, dejando a un lado la funcionalidad de la memoria humana. La psicología del testimonio nos precisa que para valorar la credibilidad no tiene por qué examinar las características del testigo, sino que debe analizarse la correspondencia entre lo sucedido y lo que manifiesta el testigo de lo que ha percibido, ya que esto permite diferenciar entre las experiencias vividas de aquellas historias imaginadas o inventadas. El objetivo del presente artículo es analizar la exactitud de la memoria a la hora de reproducir la información. Una vez analizada la exactitud de la memoria y las fallas en la recuperación de la información me centraré en presentar los pasos o criterios de valoración de la credibilidad testimonial de los testigos presenciales y referenciales que debe tener en cuenta el juez a la hora de motivar la sentencia.   2020text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7731755(Revista) ISSN 2525-510XRevista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, Vol. 6, Nº. 1 (Janeiro-Abril), 2020, pags. 453-480spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI

Dialnet

Dialnet AR

Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, ISSN 2525-510X, Vol. 6, Nº. 1 (Janeiro-Abril), 2020, pags. 453-480

Spanish

Memory
credibility
testimony
eyewitness
referential witness
Memoria
credibilidad
testimonio
testigo presencial
testigo referencial

Memory
credibility
testimony
eyewitness
referential witness
Memoria
credibilidad
testimonio
testigo presencial
testigo referencial
Ayala Yancce, Rafael
Credibilidad testimonial del testigo en el proceso penal

Nowadays, the great majority of the judges to assess the credibility of the testimonies within the criminal process as a first point analyze the personal characteristics and physiological changes of the witness, leaving aside the functionality of human memory. The psychology of the testimony tells us that in order to assess credibility, it is not necessary to examine the characteristics of the witness, but rather that the correspondence between what happened and what the witness manifests from what he has perceived must be analyzed, since this allows us to differentiate between the experiences lived from those imagined or invented stories. The objective of this article is to analyze the accuracy of the memory when reproducing the information. Once the accuracy of the report and the failures in the recovery of the information have been analyzed, I will focus on presenting the steps or criteria for assessing the testimonial credibility of the eyewitnesses and referential witnesses that the judge must take into account when motivating the judgment.

Article

Ayala Yancce, Rafael

Ayala Yancce, Rafael

Ayala Yancce, Rafael

Credibilidad testimonial del testigo en el proceso penal

Credibilidad testimonial del testigo en el proceso penal

Credibilidad testimonial del testigo en el proceso penal

Credibilidad testimonial del testigo en el proceso penal

Credibilidad testimonial del testigo en el proceso penal

credibilidad testimonial del testigo en el proceso penal

2020

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7731755

1709753372337242112