Cuando los jueces declaran inconstitucional la constitución: La reelección presidencial en américa latina a la luz de las últimas decisiones de las cortes constitucionales

This article contains a critical review of the decisions that some Latin-American Supreme or Constitutional Courts have made allowing presidential reelection despite the explicit ban in the Constitution. According to the authors, the inapplicability of constitutional provisions, which have been decl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Viciano Pastor, Roberto, Moreno González, Gabriel
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Reelección presidencial
justicia constitucional
Convención Interamericana de Derechos Humanos
neoconstitucionalismo
limitación de mandatos
This article contains a critical review of the decisions that some Latin-American Supreme or Constitutional Courts have made allowing presidential reelection despite the explicit ban in the Constitution
According to the authors
the inapplicability of constitutional provisions
which have been declared as “unconstitutional” by Courts
derives from academic misunderstanding and wrong interpretations on inadequate categories
Due to this fact
Courts have assumed an improper and hypertrophied function beyond the nature and objectives of constitutional justice
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6722683
Source:Anuario iberoamericano de justicia constitucional, ISSN 1138-4824, Nº. 22, 2018, pags. 165-198
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Cuando los jueces declaran inconstitucional la constitución: La reelección presidencial en américa latina a la luz de las últimas decisiones de las cortes constitucionales
  • Get full text

    • Similar Items