Genocidio o crímenes de lesa humanidad: el debate jurídico argentino como disputa por el sentido asignado al pasado
In the case of the Argentine genocide (1975-1983), the judicial arena became the primary setting for the dispute over the meaning of the past early on. Once the obstacles to trial were removed, the trials were reopened in 2005. With the incorporation of survivors, family members and human rights org...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7495324 |
| Source: | Estudios de derecho, ISSN 0120-1867, Vol. 77, Nº. 170, 2020, pags. 1-29 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001406800
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Estudios de derecho, ISSN 0120-1867, Vol. 77, Nº. 170, 2020, pags. 1-29
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
genocide
memory Argentinean dictatorship state crime trials genocidio memoria dictadura argentina juicios crímenes de Estado genocídio memória ditadura argentina juízos crimes de Estado |
| spellingShingle |
genocide
memory Argentinean dictatorship state crime trials genocidio memoria dictadura argentina juicios crímenes de Estado genocídio memória ditadura argentina juízos crimes de Estado Silveyra, Malena Feierstein, Daniel Genocidio o crímenes de lesa humanidad: el debate jurídico argentino como disputa por el sentido asignado al pasado |
| description |
In the case of the Argentine genocide (1975-1983), the judicial arena became the primary setting for the dispute over the meaning of the past early on. Once the obstacles to trial were removed, the trials were reopened in 2005. With the incorporation of survivors, family members and human rights organizations as plaintiffs, various debates took place that took the process beyond the limits of the courts. Chief among them: the dispute over the classification of genocide. After thirteen years of trials, an analysis of the trial process is presented in the light of this debate. Legal arguments in both respects go far beyond the limits of the courts and are articulated with disputes over the meaning assigned to the past, permeating the ways in which courts assume responsibility for judging facts and attributing responsibility. The analysis of all the sentences issued between August 2006 and June 2019 shows the progress of the debate in terms of arguments as well as the impact of conceptualizations when convicting or acquitting the accused, or handing down sentences to those convicted.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Silveyra, Malena
Feierstein, Daniel |
| author_facet |
Silveyra, Malena
Feierstein, Daniel |
| author_sort |
Silveyra, Malena
|
| title |
Genocidio o crímenes de lesa humanidad: el debate jurídico argentino como disputa por el sentido asignado al pasado
|
| title_short |
Genocidio o crímenes de lesa humanidad: el debate jurídico argentino como disputa por el sentido asignado al pasado
|
| title_full |
Genocidio o crímenes de lesa humanidad: el debate jurídico argentino como disputa por el sentido asignado al pasado
|
| title_fullStr |
Genocidio o crímenes de lesa humanidad: el debate jurídico argentino como disputa por el sentido asignado al pasado
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Genocidio o crímenes de lesa humanidad: el debate jurídico argentino como disputa por el sentido asignado al pasado
|
| title_sort |
genocidio o crímenes de lesa humanidad: el debate jurídico argentino como disputa por el sentido asignado al pasado
|
| publishDate |
2020
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7495324
|
| _version_ |
1714902518489677824
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014068002021-10-23Genocidio o crímenes de lesa humanidad: el debate jurídico argentino como disputa por el sentido asignado al pasadoSilveyra, MalenaFeierstein, DanielgenocidememoryArgentinean dictatorshipstate crime trialsgenocidiomemoriadictadura argentinajuicios crímenes de Estadogenocídiomemóriaditadura argentinajuízos crimes de EstadoIn the case of the Argentine genocide (1975-1983), the judicial arena became the primary setting for the dispute over the meaning of the past early on. Once the obstacles to trial were removed, the trials were reopened in 2005. With the incorporation of survivors, family members and human rights organizations as plaintiffs, various debates took place that took the process beyond the limits of the courts. Chief among them: the dispute over the classification of genocide. After thirteen years of trials, an analysis of the trial process is presented in the light of this debate. Legal arguments in both respects go far beyond the limits of the courts and are articulated with disputes over the meaning assigned to the past, permeating the ways in which courts assume responsibility for judging facts and attributing responsibility. The analysis of all the sentences issued between August 2006 and June 2019 shows the progress of the debate in terms of arguments as well as the impact of conceptualizations when convicting or acquitting the accused, or handing down sentences to those convicted.O cenário judicial foi constituído cedo num âmbito privilegiado para a disputa pelo sentido do passado no caso do genocídio argentino (1975-1983). Removidos os obstáculos que impediam o julgamento, em 2005 os juízos foram reabertos. A partir da incorporação de sobreviventes, familiares e organismos de direitos humanos como requerentes, se deram diferentes debates que permitiram que o processo ultrapassasse os limites dos tribunais. O principal deles foi a disputa pela qualificação do genocídio. Depois de treze anos de juízos, apresenta-se uma análise do processo de julgamento à luz deste debate. Os argumentos jurídicos em ambos os sentidos transcendem amplamente os limites dos tribunais e se articulam com as disputas pelo sentido para denominar o passado, permeando a maneira como os tribunais assumem a responsabilidade de julgar os fatos e atribuir as responsabilidades. A análise do conjunto das sentenças emitidas entre agosto de 2006 e junho de 2019, mostra o avanço do debate em termos argumentais, assim como as incidências das conceituações no momento de condenar ou absolver os acusados, ou definir as penas dos condenados.El escenario judicial se constituyó tempranamente en un ámbito privilegiado para la disputa por el sentido del pasado en el caso del genocidio argentino (1975-1983). Removidos los obstáculos que impedían el juzgamiento, en 2005 se reabrieron los juicios. A partir de la incorporación de sobrevivientes, familiares y organismos de derechos humanos como querellantes, se instalaron distintos debates que hicieron que el proceso trascendiera los límites de los tribunales. El principal de ellos: la disputa por la calificación de genocidio. Luego de trece años de juicios, se presenta un análisis del proceso de juzgamiento a la luz de este debate. Los argumentos jurídicos en uno y otro sentido trascienden ampliamente los límites de los tribunales y se articulan con las disputas por el sentido que se le asigna al pasado, permeando los modos como los tribunales asumen la responsabilidad de juzgar los hechos y atribuir responsabilidades. El análisis del conjunto de las sentencias emitidas entre agosto 2006 y junio 2019 muestra el avance del debate en términos argumentales así como las incidencias de las conceptualizaciones a la hora de condenar o absolver a los imputados, o asignar las penas de los condenados.2020text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7495324(Revista) ISSN 0120-1867Estudios de derecho, ISSN 0120-1867, Vol. 77, Nº. 170, 2020, pags. 1-29spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|