La carga de la prueba, dinámicas contemporáneas

The burden of proof is one of the most important procedural institutions for the proper development of the work of the administration of justice. It is important from the historical point of view, as well as for its theoretical, epistemic, constitutional and practical implications (jurisprudence and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meroi, Andrea A., Ramírez Carvajal, Diana María
Formato: Artículo
Idioma:Castellano
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7546498
Fuente:Estudios de derecho, ISSN 0120-1867, Vol. 77, Nº. 170, 2020, pags. 227-248
Etiquetas: Añadir etiqueta
Sin etiquetas: Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001406034
record_format
dialnet
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Estudios de derecho, ISSN 0120-1867, Vol. 77, Nº. 170, 2020, pags. 227-248
language
Spanish
topic
proof
burden of proof
principle of self-responsibility
rule of judgment
dynamic burden
carga
prueba
carga de la prueba
principiprincipio de autorresponsabilidad
regla de juicio
burden
carga dinámica
Ônus
prova
ônus da prova
princípio da auto responsabilidade
regra de experiência
carga dinâmica
spellingShingle
proof
burden of proof
principle of self-responsibility
rule of judgment
dynamic burden
carga
prueba
carga de la prueba
principiprincipio de autorresponsabilidad
regla de juicio
burden
carga dinámica
Ônus
prova
ônus da prova
princípio da auto responsabilidade
regra de experiência
carga dinâmica
Meroi, Andrea A.
Ramírez Carvajal, Diana María
La carga de la prueba, dinámicas contemporáneas
description
The burden of proof is one of the most important procedural institutions for the proper development of the work of the administration of justice. It is important from the historical point of view, as well as for its theoretical, epistemic, constitutional and practical implications (jurisprudence and litigation).An interesting perspective on Ibero-American models and the use of the burden of proof is presented here. Its procedural dimensions and the privileged place it has obtained are analyzed from two fundamental perspectives for justice: as a principle that the burden of production lies with the parties and as a rule of judgment for the judge. Work is also being carried out on the modifying trends in which a new category has been shaped in particular: the dynamic burden of proof. Explaining this new perspective and the frequent confusion experienced today is another aspect contemplated in this work, especially through an example of application in the consumer lawadopted by Argentina.
format
Article
author
Meroi, Andrea A.
Ramírez Carvajal, Diana María
author_facet
Meroi, Andrea A.
Ramírez Carvajal, Diana María
author_sort
Meroi, Andrea A.
title
La carga de la prueba, dinámicas contemporáneas
title_short
La carga de la prueba, dinámicas contemporáneas
title_full
La carga de la prueba, dinámicas contemporáneas
title_fullStr
La carga de la prueba, dinámicas contemporáneas
title_full_unstemmed
La carga de la prueba, dinámicas contemporáneas
title_sort
la carga de la prueba, dinámicas contemporáneas
publishDate
2020
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7546498
_version_
1709752433375182848
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014060342020-09-08La carga de la prueba, dinámicas contemporáneasMeroi, Andrea A.Ramírez Carvajal, Diana Maríaproofburden of proofprinciple of self-responsibilityrule of judgmentdynamic burdencargapruebacarga de la pruebaprincipiprincipio de autorresponsabilidadregla de juicioburdencarga dinámicaÔnusprovaônus da provaprincípio da auto responsabilidaderegra de experiênciacarga dinâmicaThe burden of proof is one of the most important procedural institutions for the proper development of the work of the administration of justice. It is important from the historical point of view, as well as for its theoretical, epistemic, constitutional and practical implications (jurisprudence and litigation).An interesting perspective on Ibero-American models and the use of the burden of proof is presented here. Its procedural dimensions and the privileged place it has obtained are analyzed from two fundamental perspectives for justice: as a principle that the burden of production lies with the parties and as a rule of judgment for the judge. Work is also being carried out on the modifying trends in which a new category has been shaped in particular: the dynamic burden of proof. Explaining this new perspective and the frequent confusion experienced today is another aspect contemplated in this work, especially through an example of application in the consumer lawadopted by Argentina.O ônus da prova é uma das instituições processuais mais importantes para o desenvolvimento adequado do exercício da administração de justiça. Aumenta sua importância do ponto de vista histórico, devido às suas implicações teóricas, epistêmicas, constitucionais e práticas (jurisprudencial e litigiosa).Aqui se expõe uma perspectiva de interesse sobre os modelos ibero-americanos e o uso do ônus da prova. São analisadas suas dimensões processuais e o lugar privilegiado que obtiveram em duas perspectivas fundamentais para a justiça: como princípio de contribuição de parte e como regra de experiência para o juiz. É possível trabalhar com as modificadoras tendências nas quais uma nova teoria foi moldada: a distribuição dinâmica do ônus da prova. Explicar esta nova perspectiva e a frequente confusão que se vive atualmente são outros aspectos contemplados no presente trabalho, especialmente através de um exemplo de aplicação na Lei do Consumidor adotada pela Argentina.La carga de la prueba es una de las instituciones procesales más importantes para el adecuado desarrollo de la labor de la administración de justicia. Se reviste de importancia desde el punto de vista histórico, así como por sus implicaciones teóricas, epistémicas, constitucionales y prácticas (jurisprudencial y litigiosa).Se expone aquí una perspectiva de interés sobre los modelos iberoamericanos y la utilización de la carga de la prueba. Se analizan sus dimensiones procesales y el lugar privilegiado que ha obtenido desde dos perspectivas fundamentales para la justicia: como principio de aportación de parte y como regla de juicio para el juez. Asimismo, se trabaja, sobre las tendencias modificatorias en las se ha plasmado especialmente una nueva categoría: la carga dinámica de la prueba. Explicar esta nueva perspectiva y la frecuente confusión que hoy se vive es otro aspecto contemplado en el presente trabajo, especialmente a través de un ejemplo de aplicación en la ley del consumidor adoptada por Argentina.2020text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7546498(Revista) ISSN 0120-1867Estudios de derecho, ISSN 0120-1867, Vol. 77, Nº. 170, 2020, pags. 227-248spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI