Justicia transicional y corte interamericana de derechos humanos: Una propuesta de justificación
This paper highlights decisions on “transitional justice” taken in “founding moments” and how the problems to be addressed are moral, legal and political. The latter is characterized by (i) the need to establish a community based on enduring polical rights, and (ii) the contextual constraints t...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7517736 |
| Source: | Jurídicas, ISSN 1794-2918, Vol. 10, Nº. 2, 2013, pags. 24-39 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001401863
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Jurídicas, ISSN 1794-2918, Vol. 10, Nº. 2, 2013, pags. 24-39
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
políticas transicionales
jurisprudencia amnistía derecho penal criterios de justificación transitional policies jurispridence amnesty Criminal Law justification |
| spellingShingle |
políticas transicionales
jurisprudencia amnistía derecho penal criterios de justificación transitional policies jurispridence amnesty Criminal Law justification Mocoroa, Juan Manuel Justicia transicional y corte interamericana de derechos humanos: Una propuesta de justificación |
| description |
This paper highlights decisions on “transitional justice”
taken in “founding moments” and how the problems
to be addressed are moral, legal and political. The
latter is characterized by (i) the need to establish a
community based on enduring polical rights, and
(ii) the contextual constraints that limit punishment.
The Inter American Human Rights Court does not
consider this when analyzing transitional justice
measures –ie. Amnesty and the role of criminal law.
It is proposed to justify transitional policies with two
values / reasons. First, the crimes committed in order
to restore dignity to the victims –ie. Retrospective and
intrinsic reasons– muist be reprached. Second, those
facts must be punished because it is the best way
to establish a lasting community –ie. Retrospective
and instrumental reasons. This is to say, not only acts
committed are punished but also a community based
on rights is established. If these are the reasons thay
justify transitional justice measures, there should be
a balance between the two perspectives in those
founding moments. Its result will not always be to
use Criminal Law to reproach these facts. However,
they are justified despite the assertions of the Inter
American Human Rights Court.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Mocoroa, Juan Manuel
|
| author_facet |
Mocoroa, Juan Manuel
|
| author_sort |
Mocoroa, Juan Manuel
|
| title |
Justicia transicional y corte interamericana de derechos humanos: Una propuesta de justificación
|
| title_short |
Justicia transicional y corte interamericana de derechos humanos: Una propuesta de justificación
|
| title_full |
Justicia transicional y corte interamericana de derechos humanos: Una propuesta de justificación
|
| title_fullStr |
Justicia transicional y corte interamericana de derechos humanos: Una propuesta de justificación
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Justicia transicional y corte interamericana de derechos humanos: Una propuesta de justificación
|
| title_sort |
justicia transicional y corte interamericana de derechos humanos: una propuesta de justificación
|
| publishDate |
2013
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7517736
|
| _version_ |
1709752658677465088
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014018632020-08-02Justicia transicional y corte interamericana de derechos humanos: Una propuesta de justificaciónMocoroa, Juan Manuelpolíticas transicionalesjurisprudenciaamnistíaderecho penalcriterios de justificacióntransitional policiesjurispridenceamnestyCriminal LawjustificationThis paper highlights decisions on “transitional justice” taken in “founding moments” and how the problems to be addressed are moral, legal and political. The latter is characterized by (i) the need to establish a community based on enduring polical rights, and (ii) the contextual constraints that limit punishment. The Inter American Human Rights Court does not consider this when analyzing transitional justice measures –ie. Amnesty and the role of criminal law. It is proposed to justify transitional policies with two values / reasons. First, the crimes committed in order to restore dignity to the victims –ie. Retrospective and intrinsic reasons– muist be reprached. Second, those facts must be punished because it is the best way to establish a lasting community –ie. Retrospective and instrumental reasons. This is to say, not only acts committed are punished but also a community based on rights is established. If these are the reasons thay justify transitional justice measures, there should be a balance between the two perspectives in those founding moments. Its result will not always be to use Criminal Law to reproach these facts. However, they are justified despite the assertions of the Inter American Human Rights Court.En este trabajo se resalta que las decisiones sobre la “justicia transicional” son adoptadas en “momentos fundacionales” y que los problemas a enfrentar son morales, jurídicos y políticos. Este último se caracteriza por (i) la necesidad de fundar una comunidad política basada en derechos perdurable; y, (ii) los condicionamientos contextuales que limitan el castigo. Ahora, la Corte IDH no considera esto al analizar las medidas de justicia transicional –ie. amnistía y el rol del derecho penal–. Se propone justificar a las políticas transicionales con dos valores/ razones. Primero, debemos reprochar los crímenes cometidos de modo que se devuelva la dignidad a las víctimas –ie. razones retrospectivas e intrínsecas–. Segundo, deben castigarse esos hechos porque es la mejor forma de fundar una comunidad perdurable –ie. razones prospectivas e instrumentales–. Esto es, castigamos no solo por los hechos cometidos sino también, para fundar definitivamente una comunidad basada en derechos. Si son estas las razones que justifican las medidas de justicia transicional, debería hacerse un balance entre ambas perspectivas en esos momentos fundacionales. Su resultado no será siempre recurrir al derecho penal para reprochar estos hechos. Sin embargo, están justificadas, pese a lo que sostiene la Corte IDH.2013text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7517736(Revista) ISSN 1794-2918Jurídicas, ISSN 1794-2918, Vol. 10, Nº. 2, 2013, pags. 24-39spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|