La Ley de Procedimiento Administrativo y el monopolio postal
This article analyzes one of the problems of the Chilean law on administrative procedures which is the eventual monopolistic competition for notifying the Administrative acts of the State trough certified letters sent via a State-owned company. This institution has not been systematically approached...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7513049 |
| Source: | Opinión Jurídica: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Medellín, ISSN 1692-2530, Vol. 19, Nº. 38, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: January-june), pags. 159-178 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001400995
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014009952020-07-28La Ley de Procedimiento Administrativo y el monopolio postalEnteiche Rosales, Nicolásconstitutional rightadministrative lawadministrative proceduresnotificationsmonopolyderecho constitucionalderecho administrativoprocedimiento administrativonotificacionesmonopoliodireito constitucionaldireito administrativoprocedimento administrativonotificaçõesmonopólioThis article analyzes one of the problems of the Chilean law on administrative procedures which is the eventual monopolistic competition for notifying the Administrative acts of the State trough certified letters sent via a State-owned company. This institution has not been systematically approached but has aroused dissimilar criteria from the General Comptroller of the Republic as from the second subsection of the 46th article. The interpretation of the administrative jurisprudence is contrasted with the existing requirements of a state monopoly, as well as the right to develop any economic activity and the concept of public faith.Este artigo analisa um dos problemas da lei chilena sobre procedimento administrativo, que é a eventual competência de monopólio para notificar os atos da administração do Estado por meio de cartas certificadas via empresa estatal. Essa instituição não vem sendo abordada de forma sistemática, mas vem suscitando diferentes critérios por parte da Controladoria Geral da Nação, a partir do segundo inciso do artigo 46. Contrasta-se a interpretação da jurisprudência administrativa com os requisitos da existência de um monopólio estatal, bem como o direito ao desenvolvimento de qualquer atividade econômica e do conceito de “fé pública”.Este artículo analiza uno de los problemas de la ley chilena sobre procedimiento administrativo, que es la eventual competencia monopólica para notificar los actos de la Administración del Estado a través de cartas certificadas por medio de una empresa estatal. Esta institución no ha sido abordada sistemáticamente, pero ha suscitado disímiles criterios de la Contraloría General de la República, a partir del inciso segundo del artículo 46. Se contrasta la interpretación de la jurisprudencia administrativa con los requisitos de existencia de un monopolio estatal, así como el derecho al desarrollo de cualquier actividad económica y el concepto de fe pública.2020text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7513049(Revista) ISSN 1692-2530Opinión Jurídica: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Medellín, ISSN 1692-2530, Vol. 19, Nº. 38, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: January-june), pags. 159-178spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Opinión Jurídica: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Medellín, ISSN 1692-2530, Vol. 19, Nº. 38, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: January-june), pags. 159-178
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
constitutional right
administrative law administrative procedures notifications monopoly derecho constitucional derecho administrativo procedimiento administrativo notificaciones monopolio direito constitucional direito administrativo procedimento administrativo notificações monopólio |
| spellingShingle |
constitutional right
administrative law administrative procedures notifications monopoly derecho constitucional derecho administrativo procedimiento administrativo notificaciones monopolio direito constitucional direito administrativo procedimento administrativo notificações monopólio Enteiche Rosales, Nicolás La Ley de Procedimiento Administrativo y el monopolio postal |
| description |
This article analyzes one of the problems of the Chilean law on administrative procedures which is the eventual monopolistic competition for notifying the Administrative acts of the State trough certified letters sent via a State-owned company. This institution has not been systematically approached but has aroused dissimilar criteria from the General Comptroller of the Republic as from the second subsection of the 46th article. The interpretation of the administrative jurisprudence is contrasted with the existing requirements of a state monopoly, as well as the right to develop any economic activity and the concept of public faith.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Enteiche Rosales, Nicolás
|
| author_facet |
Enteiche Rosales, Nicolás
|
| author_sort |
Enteiche Rosales, Nicolás
|
| title |
La Ley de Procedimiento Administrativo y el monopolio postal
|
| title_short |
La Ley de Procedimiento Administrativo y el monopolio postal
|
| title_full |
La Ley de Procedimiento Administrativo y el monopolio postal
|
| title_fullStr |
La Ley de Procedimiento Administrativo y el monopolio postal
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
La Ley de Procedimiento Administrativo y el monopolio postal
|
| title_sort |
la ley de procedimiento administrativo y el monopolio postal
|
| publishDate |
2020
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7513049
|
| _version_ |
1709752113551114240
|