El precedente del Consejo de Estado en las fuentes del derecho administrativo
This article deals with reflecting on the role of the judicial precedent of the Council of State in relation to the system of sources of Colombian administrative law. Therefore, its main purpose is to provide elements of analysis that contribute to elucidating its role as the main source. To do this...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7513027 |
| Source: | Opinión Jurídica: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Medellín, ISSN 1692-2530, Vol. 18, Nº. 36, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Enero-junio), pags. 257-277 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001400974
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Opinión Jurídica: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Medellín, ISSN 1692-2530, Vol. 18, Nº. 36, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Enero-junio), pags. 257-277
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
precedent
Council of State jurisprudence sources unification sentences ratio decidendi precedente Consejo de Estado jurisprudencia fuentes sentencias de unificación ratio decidendi precedente Conselho de Estado jurisprudência fontes sentencias de unificação ratio decidendi |
| spellingShingle |
precedent
Council of State jurisprudence sources unification sentences ratio decidendi precedente Consejo de Estado jurisprudencia fuentes sentencias de unificación ratio decidendi precedente Conselho de Estado jurisprudência fontes sentencias de unificação ratio decidendi Garay Herazo, Kennier José El precedente del Consejo de Estado en las fuentes del derecho administrativo |
| description |
This article deals with reflecting on the role of the judicial precedent of the Council of State in relation to the system of sources of Colombian administrative law. Therefore, its main purpose is to provide elements of analysis that contribute to elucidating its role as the main source. To do this, we start by contextualizing, defining and differentiating notions such as jurisprudence and precedent. Then, the evolution of these concepts in the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Justice is reviewed in order to evaluate its use in the Council of State’s decisions. Regarding the latter, particular attention is given to the judgements of jurisprudential unification, which have a binding force of legal status. However, for systematic reasons it is argued that, in this “jurisdiction”, they are not the only ones that set a judicial precedent.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Garay Herazo, Kennier José
|
| author_facet |
Garay Herazo, Kennier José
|
| author_sort |
Garay Herazo, Kennier José
|
| title |
El precedente del Consejo de Estado en las fuentes del derecho administrativo
|
| title_short |
El precedente del Consejo de Estado en las fuentes del derecho administrativo
|
| title_full |
El precedente del Consejo de Estado en las fuentes del derecho administrativo
|
| title_fullStr |
El precedente del Consejo de Estado en las fuentes del derecho administrativo
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
El precedente del Consejo de Estado en las fuentes del derecho administrativo
|
| title_sort |
el precedente del consejo de estado en las fuentes del derecho administrativo
|
| publishDate |
2019
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7513027
|
| _version_ |
1709752101902483456
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014009742020-07-28El precedente del Consejo de Estado en las fuentes del derecho administrativoGaray Herazo, Kennier JoséprecedentCouncil of Statejurisprudencesourcesunification sentencesratio decidendiprecedenteConsejo de Estadojurisprudenciafuentessentencias de unificaciónratio decidendiprecedenteConselho de Estadojurisprudênciafontessentencias de unificaçãoratio decidendiThis article deals with reflecting on the role of the judicial precedent of the Council of State in relation to the system of sources of Colombian administrative law. Therefore, its main purpose is to provide elements of analysis that contribute to elucidating its role as the main source. To do this, we start by contextualizing, defining and differentiating notions such as jurisprudence and precedent. Then, the evolution of these concepts in the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Justice is reviewed in order to evaluate its use in the Council of State’s decisions. Regarding the latter, particular attention is given to the judgements of jurisprudential unification, which have a binding force of legal status. However, for systematic reasons it is argued that, in this “jurisdiction”, they are not the only ones that set a judicial precedent.Este artigo se ocupa de refletir sobre o papel do precedente judicial do Conselho de Estado com respeito ao sistema de fontes do direito administrativo colombiano. Portanto, seu propósito principal é oferecer elementos de análise que contribuam para o esclarecimento de seu papel como fonte principal. Para isso, parte-se de contextualizar, definir e diferenciar noções como as de jurisprudência e precedente. Em seguida, revisa-se a evolução desses conceitos na Corte Constitucional e na Corte Suprema de Justiça para avaliar seu uso nas decisões do Conselho de Estado. Com respeito a este último, enfatiza-se nas sentenças de unificação jurisprudencial, as quais têm uma força vinculante de alcance legal. Não obstante, por razões sistemáticas, defende-se que nessa “jurisdição” não são apenas elas que configuram precedente judicial.Este artículo se ocupa de reflexionar sobre el papel del precedente judicial del Consejo de Estado con respecto al sistema de fuentes del derecho administrativo colombiano. Por tanto, su propósito principal es aportar elementos de análisis que contribuyan al esclarecimiento de su rol como fuente principal. Para ello, se parte de contextualizar, definir y diferenciar nociones como las de jurisprudencia y precedente. Luego, se revisa la evolución de estos conceptos en la Corte Constitucional y en la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para evaluar su uso en las decisiones del Consejo de Estado. Con relación a este último, se enfatiza en las sentencias de unificación jurisprudencial, las cuales poseen una fuerza vinculante de rango legal. No obstante, por razones sistemáticas se sostiene que en esta “jurisdicción”, no solo ellas configuran precedente judicial.2019text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7513027(Revista) ISSN 1692-2530Opinión Jurídica: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Medellín, ISSN 1692-2530, Vol. 18, Nº. 36, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Enero-junio), pags. 257-277spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|