¿En qué sentido es objetiva la noción de incumplimiento del soft law?

This research aims to analyze the non-compliance in the soft law, in the light of the new objectives postulates about the guilt (or what has been called as objective criteria of accountability). Conclusions put into question that really there is a big difference in terms of failure and guilt in the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barcia Lehmann, Rodrigo, Rivera Restrepo, José Maximiliano
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7513023
Source:Opinión Jurídica: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Medellín, ISSN 1692-2530, Vol. 18, Nº. 36, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Enero-junio), pags. 165-181
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Summary: This research aims to analyze the non-compliance in the soft law, in the light of the new objectives postulates about the guilt (or what has been called as objective criteria of accountability). Conclusions put into question that really there is a big difference in terms of failure and guilt in the system of law of remedies of soft law and what has been called as a traditional contract law. Review of soft law texts, which have contributed to change the paradigm in continental Europe and Latin America, moving from a system based on the subjective guilt to a notion of objective fault influencing specific performance and compensation of damages. The method of work proposed is that of the legal sciences: the exhaustive analysis of doctrine and jurisprudence, mainly Spanish.