O poder judiciário e o mito grego do deus Cronos: a judicialização dos meios consensuais de solucionar conflitos e o monopólio de acesso à justiça
In the Greek mythology, the god Kronos swallowed his children after birth, in order not to be dethroned and thus to perpetuate himself in power. The Brazilian State, when represented by the Judiciary, in seeking ways to provide access to qualified justice, has been overusing extrajudicial forms – wh...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7490788 |
| Source: | Anamorphosis: Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura, ISSN 2446-8088, null 5, Nº. 1, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: janeiro-junho), pags. 173-190 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001397568
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Anamorphosis: Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura, ISSN 2446-8088, null 5, Nº. 1, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: janeiro-junho), pags. 173-190
|
| language |
Portuguese
|
| topic |
Law
Sociology political science access to justice judicialization consensual means of conflict resolution Greek mythology Judiciary Direito Sociologia Ciência Política acesso à justiça judicialização meios consensuais de solução de conflitos mitologia grega poder judiciário |
| spellingShingle |
Law
Sociology political science access to justice judicialization consensual means of conflict resolution Greek mythology Judiciary Direito Sociologia Ciência Política acesso à justiça judicialização meios consensuais de solução de conflitos mitologia grega poder judiciário Stangherlin, Camila Silveira Spengler, Fabiana Marion O poder judiciário e o mito grego do deus Cronos: a judicialização dos meios consensuais de solucionar conflitos e o monopólio de acesso à justiça |
| description |
In the Greek mythology, the god Kronos swallowed his children after birth, in order not to be dethroned and thus to perpetuate himself in power. The Brazilian State, when represented by the Judiciary, in seeking ways to provide access to qualified justice, has been overusing extrajudicial forms – which at community level have provided differentiated approaches to conflict – but such overuse has transformed these extrajudicial decisions into rules of traditional jurisdiction. The present study aims at analyzing the perspective of the Judiciary at implementing alternatives to adjudicated decisions, by means of editing norms that keep it as a centralizing entity, through self-determined means outlined under its order. The research is based on the bibliographical method and contains an examination of the doctrine and legislation connected to the theme, as well as the hypothetical-deductive approach and monographic procedure method. In this understanding, one wonders: from the myth of the Greek god Kronos, is it possible to identify an excess – by the Judiciary – in subtracting consensual ways of resolving conflicts in order to retain the monopoly of jurisdiction? The incessant intervention of the Brazilian Judiciary is incontestable in covering all the questions related to the delineation of the self-composition of conflicts, infecting them with the perils of a decadent system, hence separating the citizen from the access to justice.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Stangherlin, Camila Silveira
Spengler, Fabiana Marion |
| author_facet |
Stangherlin, Camila Silveira
Spengler, Fabiana Marion |
| author_sort |
Stangherlin, Camila Silveira
|
| title |
O poder judiciário e o mito grego do deus Cronos: a judicialização dos meios consensuais de solucionar conflitos e o monopólio de acesso à justiça
|
| title_short |
O poder judiciário e o mito grego do deus Cronos: a judicialização dos meios consensuais de solucionar conflitos e o monopólio de acesso à justiça
|
| title_full |
O poder judiciário e o mito grego do deus Cronos: a judicialização dos meios consensuais de solucionar conflitos e o monopólio de acesso à justiça
|
| title_fullStr |
O poder judiciário e o mito grego do deus Cronos: a judicialização dos meios consensuais de solucionar conflitos e o monopólio de acesso à justiça
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
O poder judiciário e o mito grego do deus Cronos: a judicialização dos meios consensuais de solucionar conflitos e o monopólio de acesso à justiça
|
| title_sort |
o poder judiciário e o mito grego do deus cronos: a judicialização dos meios consensuais de solucionar conflitos e o monopólio de acesso à justiça
|
| publishDate |
2019
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7490788
|
| _version_ |
1709752701459365888
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00013975682020-07-10O poder judiciário e o mito grego do deus Cronos: a judicialização dos meios consensuais de solucionar conflitos e o monopólio de acesso à justiçaStangherlin, Camila SilveiraSpengler, Fabiana MarionLawSociologypolitical scienceaccess to justicejudicializationconsensual means of conflict resolutionGreek mythologyJudiciaryDireitoSociologiaCiência Políticaacesso à justiçajudicializaçãomeios consensuais de solução de conflitosmitologia gregapoder judiciárioIn the Greek mythology, the god Kronos swallowed his children after birth, in order not to be dethroned and thus to perpetuate himself in power. The Brazilian State, when represented by the Judiciary, in seeking ways to provide access to qualified justice, has been overusing extrajudicial forms – which at community level have provided differentiated approaches to conflict – but such overuse has transformed these extrajudicial decisions into rules of traditional jurisdiction. The present study aims at analyzing the perspective of the Judiciary at implementing alternatives to adjudicated decisions, by means of editing norms that keep it as a centralizing entity, through self-determined means outlined under its order. The research is based on the bibliographical method and contains an examination of the doctrine and legislation connected to the theme, as well as the hypothetical-deductive approach and monographic procedure method. In this understanding, one wonders: from the myth of the Greek god Kronos, is it possible to identify an excess – by the Judiciary – in subtracting consensual ways of resolving conflicts in order to retain the monopoly of jurisdiction? The incessant intervention of the Brazilian Judiciary is incontestable in covering all the questions related to the delineation of the self-composition of conflicts, infecting them with the perils of a decadent system, hence separating the citizen from the access to justice.Na mitologia grega, o deus Cronos engolia seus filhos após o nascimento, no intuito de não ser destronado e, assim, perpetuar-se no poder. O Estado, representado pelo Poder Judiciário, ao almejar vias que possibilitem o acesso à justiça qualificado, vem balizando formas extrajudiciais – que em âmbito comunitário propiciavam uma abordagem diferenciada do conflito – e convertendo-as aos ditames da jurisdição tradicional. O presente estudo objetiva analisar a perspectiva do Poder Judiciário em implementar alternativas à decisão adjudicada, pela edição de normas que o mantém como ente centralizador, através de meios autocompositivos delineados sob seu crivo. A pesquisa vale-se de técnica bibliográfica, contendo exame da doutrina e legislação condizente ao tema, bem como utilizando o método de abordagem hipotético-dedutivo e método de procedimento monográfico. Nessa compreensão, questiona-se: a partir do mito do deus grego Cronos, é possível identificar um excesso – por parte do Poder Judiciário – de subtração das formas consensuais de solucionar conflitos, a fim de manter-se no monopólio da jurisdição? É inconteste a incessante intervenção do Poder Judiciário em abarcar todas as questões relacionadas ao deslinde da autocomposição de conflitos, eivando-as com as mazelas próprias de um sistema em decadência e afastando o cidadão do acesso à justiça. 2019text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7490788(Revista) ISSN 2446-8088Anamorphosis: Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura, ISSN 2446-8088, null 5, Nº. 1, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: janeiro-junho), pags. 173-190porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|