“Você não tem o controle”: a Lei Complementar 157/2016 e a Netflix no Brasil
The aims of this study are to discuss the constitutionality of Complementary Law 157/2016 and examine its possible impacts to Netflix in Brazil. The central argument points out that the Law is unconstitutional, because, since streaming is a mechanism of data distribution through packets, the distrib...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7470289 |
| Source: | Revista Brasileira de Direito, ISSN 2238-0604, Vol. 15, Nº. 3, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: RBD. Set-Dez/2019), pags. 204-221 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001395164
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Brasileira de Direito, ISSN 2238-0604, Vol. 15, Nº. 3, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: RBD. Set-Dez/2019), pags. 204-221
|
| language |
Portuguese
|
| topic |
Lei Complementar 157
2016 Netflix streaming constitucionalidade Complementary Law 157 2016 Netflix Streaming Constitutionality |
| spellingShingle |
Lei Complementar 157
2016 Netflix streaming constitucionalidade Complementary Law 157 2016 Netflix Streaming Constitutionality Santos Vieira de Jesus, Diego Kamlot, Daniel de Oliveira Santos Vieira de Jesus, Henrique “Você não tem o controle”: a Lei Complementar 157/2016 e a Netflix no Brasil |
| description |
The aims of this study are to discuss the constitutionality of Complementary Law 157/2016 and examine its possible impacts to Netflix in Brazil. The central argument points out that the Law is unconstitutional, because, since streaming is a mechanism of data distribution through packets, the distributed information is not stored by the user receiving the media to be reproduced. In this sense, it does not constitute a service as an obligation to do of a physical or intellectual nature. According to the Brazilian Constitution, municipalities do not have the right to institute ISS on services that characterize obligations to do. The approval of Complementary Law 157/2016 may be harmful to Netflix, since the company brought the possibility of new services based on digital media and impacted the distribution – expanding global access and minimizing transaction costs – and the consumption of cultural and creative goods in the audio-visual sector. With the possibility that streaming services may become more expensive and less accessible – since ISS charging may end up increasing the prices of the service the company offers to its customers - the Brazilian consumer may limit its search for goods and services from these new forms of data distribution.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Santos Vieira de Jesus, Diego
Kamlot, Daniel de Oliveira Santos Vieira de Jesus, Henrique |
| author_facet |
Santos Vieira de Jesus, Diego
Kamlot, Daniel de Oliveira Santos Vieira de Jesus, Henrique |
| author_sort |
Santos Vieira de Jesus, Diego
|
| title |
“Você não tem o controle”: a Lei Complementar 157/2016 e a Netflix no Brasil
|
| title_short |
“Você não tem o controle”: a Lei Complementar 157/2016 e a Netflix no Brasil
|
| title_full |
“Você não tem o controle”: a Lei Complementar 157/2016 e a Netflix no Brasil
|
| title_fullStr |
“Você não tem o controle”: a Lei Complementar 157/2016 e a Netflix no Brasil
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
“Você não tem o controle”: a Lei Complementar 157/2016 e a Netflix no Brasil
|
| title_sort |
“você não tem o controle”: a lei complementar 157/2016 e a netflix no brasil
|
| publishDate |
2019
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7470289
|
| _version_ |
1709752226974531584
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00013951642020-06-26“Você não tem o controle”: a Lei Complementar 157/2016 e a Netflix no BrasilSantos Vieira de Jesus, DiegoKamlot, Danielde Oliveira Santos Vieira de Jesus, HenriqueLei Complementar 1572016NetflixstreamingconstitucionalidadeComplementary Law 1572016NetflixStreamingConstitutionalityThe aims of this study are to discuss the constitutionality of Complementary Law 157/2016 and examine its possible impacts to Netflix in Brazil. The central argument points out that the Law is unconstitutional, because, since streaming is a mechanism of data distribution through packets, the distributed information is not stored by the user receiving the media to be reproduced. In this sense, it does not constitute a service as an obligation to do of a physical or intellectual nature. According to the Brazilian Constitution, municipalities do not have the right to institute ISS on services that characterize obligations to do. The approval of Complementary Law 157/2016 may be harmful to Netflix, since the company brought the possibility of new services based on digital media and impacted the distribution – expanding global access and minimizing transaction costs – and the consumption of cultural and creative goods in the audio-visual sector. With the possibility that streaming services may become more expensive and less accessible – since ISS charging may end up increasing the prices of the service the company offers to its customers - the Brazilian consumer may limit its search for goods and services from these new forms of data distribution.Os objetivos deste estudo são debater a constitucionalidade da Lei Complementar 157/2016 e examinar seus possíveis impactos para a Netflix no Brasil. O argumento central aponta que a Lei é inconstitucional, pois, já que o streaming é um mecanismo de distribuição de dados por meio de pacotes, as informações distribuídas não são armazenadas pelo usuário que recebe a mídia a ser reproduzida. Nesse sentido, ele não configura um serviço enquanto obrigação de fazer de natureza física ou intelectual. De acordo com a Constituição brasileira, os municípios somente teriam o direito de instituir ISS sobre prestações de serviços que caracterizem obrigações de fazer. A sanção da Lei Complementar 157/2016 pode ser prejudicial para a Netflix, haja vista que a empresa trouxe a possibilidade de novos serviços com base na mídia digital e impactou a distribuição – ampliando o acesso global e minimizando custos de transação – e o consumo de bens culturais e criativos no setor audiovisual. Com a possibilidade de que os serviços de streaming se tornem mais caros e menos acessíveis – uma vez que a cobrança do ISS sobre a empresa pode acabar aumentando os preços do serviço oferecido por ela para seus clientes –, o consumidor brasileiro pode limitar sua busca por bens e serviços criativos a partir dessas novas formas de distribuição de dados.2019text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7470289(Revista) ISSN 2238-0604Revista Brasileira de Direito, ISSN 2238-0604, Vol. 15, Nº. 3, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: RBD. Set-Dez/2019), pags. 204-221porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|