The claim to correctness and moral constraints on law: A critic to the separability thesis

dialnet-ar-18-ART0001395150

dialnet

dialnet-ar-18-ART00013951502020-06-26The claim to correctness and moral constraints on law: A critic to the separability thesisNava Tovar, AlejandroPretensão de CorreçãoMoralidadeDireitoPositivismo JurídicoNão PositivismoFórmula RadbruchClaim to CorrectnessMoralityLawLegal PositivismNon-positivismRadbruch FormulaThis essay explains the claim to correctness and its moral constraints on law, according to Alexy’s theory of law. In order to explain this, in a first section I expose the concept and normative nature of the claim to correctness in the work of Robert Alexy, while in a second section I present some replies raised both by Eugenio Bulygin and Joseph Raz to this claim. In the third section I connect this claim with the idea of moral constraints on law, and finally, in the fourth section, I expose my remarks to the claim of correctness, which aims to reduce the degree of arbitrariness and injustice in law, but only at some extent.O presente artigo explica a pretensão de correção e os seus efeitos limitadores sobre o Direito, de acordo com a teoria do direito de Robert Alexy. Para apresentar isso, na primeira seção é apresentado o conceito e a natureza normativa da pretensão de correção na visão de Robert Alexy. Na segunda seção são apresentadas as respostas de Eugenio Bulygin e Joseph Raz à pretensão de correção. Na terceira seção é conectada a pretensão de correção à ideia de lmitações morais para, no final, na quarta seção, ser apresentadas considerações sobre a pretensão de correção, em especial, proposta para reduzir o grau de arbitrariedade e injustiça no direito.2019text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7469476(Revista) ISSN 2238-0604Revista Brasileira de Direito, ISSN 2238-0604, Vol. 15, Nº. 3, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: RBD. Set-Dez/2019), pags. 5-22engLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI

Dialnet

Dialnet AR

Revista Brasileira de Direito, ISSN 2238-0604, Vol. 15, Nº. 3, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: RBD. Set-Dez/2019), pags. 5-22

English

Pretensão de Correção
Moralidade
Direito
Positivismo Jurídico
Não Positivismo
Fórmula Radbruch
Claim to Correctness
Morality
Law
Legal Positivism
Non-positivism
Radbruch Formula

Pretensão de Correção
Moralidade
Direito
Positivismo Jurídico
Não Positivismo
Fórmula Radbruch
Claim to Correctness
Morality
Law
Legal Positivism
Non-positivism
Radbruch Formula
Nava Tovar, Alejandro
The claim to correctness and moral constraints on law: A critic to the separability thesis

This essay explains the claim to correctness and its moral constraints on law, according to Alexy’s theory of law. In order to explain this, in a first section I expose the concept and normative nature of the claim to correctness in the work of Robert Alexy, while in a second section I present some replies raised both by Eugenio Bulygin and Joseph Raz to this claim. In the third section I connect this claim with the idea of moral constraints on law, and finally, in the fourth section, I expose my remarks to the claim of correctness, which aims to reduce the degree of arbitrariness and injustice in law, but only at some extent.

Article

Nava Tovar, Alejandro

Nava Tovar, Alejandro

Nava Tovar, Alejandro

The claim to correctness and moral constraints on law: A critic to the separability thesis

The claim to correctness and moral constraints on law: A critic to the separability thesis

The claim to correctness and moral constraints on law: A critic to the separability thesis

The claim to correctness and moral constraints on law: A critic to the separability thesis

The claim to correctness and moral constraints on law: A critic to the separability thesis

claim to correctness and moral constraints on law: a critic to the separability thesis

2019

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7469476

1709752225466679296